World: r3wp
[!REBOL3 Host Kit]
older | first |
GrahamC 12-Feb-2011 [1189] | he's alive! |
BrianH 13-Feb-2011 [1190] | Has anyone tried compiling the hostkit for MinGW with the Cygwin compiler set? I'm trying to minimize the number of GCC installations on my Windows machine, and the Android NDK requires Cygwin to do its build process. |
Andreas 13-Feb-2011 [1191x4] | should be possible (and rather unproblematic) but give you something very different |
mingw-compiled .exe's are native win32 exes, cygwin-compiled stuff depends on the cygwin runtime | |
so cygwin gcc really != mingw gcc, just as linux-x86 gcc != linux-arm gcc | |
(at least last time i looked at cygwin, which was years ago. but i doubt things have changed much) | |
BrianH 13-Feb-2011 [1195] | Cygwin can compile MinGW exes, Linux exes, Android ARM exes, etc. I am more concerned with the makefiles and settings involved. |
Andreas 13-Feb-2011 [1196] | heh, it's not cygwin which does the compiling :) |
BrianH 13-Feb-2011 [1197] | The MinGW compilers were originally hosted on Cygwin, and that has been supported all along. |
Andreas 13-Feb-2011 [1198x3] | if you can compile arm and mingw binaries in cygwin, you already have two sets of compilers installed |
and if you have the mingw cross-compiler installed within cygwin, that will do just fine with the current host kit | |
just be sure to use the correct gcc | |
BrianH 13-Feb-2011 [1201] | I am OK with more than one set of (cross) compilers but I don't want to duplicate the rest of the infrastructure. I'm having enough trouble with Git installing its own copy of MSys instead of using the already-installed copy; I don't want to compound the issue by having to install MinGW and Cygwin both. |
Andreas 13-Feb-2011 [1202x2] | you'll probably have to use a different gcc (i686-pc-mingw32-gcc or something) or pass -mno-cygwin to the default gcc |
btw, you don't need msys to compile the host kit. mingw alone is sufficient | |
BrianH 13-Feb-2011 [1204] | I was going to try using the i686 build (on this machine) of MinGW-64 in Cygwin as my only Windows x86 compiler. Then I'd only need to add the Android ARM and x86 cross compilers to cover what I currently need to compile, and be able to make 64bit apps when I get my Win7 machine rebuilt. |
Andreas 13-Feb-2011 [1205] | without a 64-bit r3lib, you won't get 64bit builds of r3 any time soon :) |
BrianH 13-Feb-2011 [1206] | Best to be prepared :) |
Andreas 13-Feb-2011 [1207] | but usually, the x86-64 gcc's happily emit x86-32 just by passing -m32 |
BrianH 13-Feb-2011 [1208] | Yup, MinGW-64 has good support for generating 32bit code; I was researching the issues involved all of yesterday. |
Oldes 14-Feb-2011 [1209x6] | Fixed the warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'wchar_t*' https://github.com/Oldes/R3A110/commit/aebc8b8334f1396862b7249d2ab993d83c1c11f8 |
should be probably improved to set different name for non Windows builds. | |
And here is merge with Andreas' changes: https://github.com/Oldes/R3A110/commit/ed261d8a39b973de6635b9833c32ceffe0780cba | |
Tested only on Windows. | |
What is strange is, that exes built using make-gcc/3.1/makefile are detected by Norton Sonar as suspicious :-/ not the one built with Codeblocks http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/sonar-detects-our-protected-application-high-security-risk | |
this one: http://securityresponse.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2010-090200-2232-99 I will submit it to Norton as false positive. | |
BrianH 14-Feb-2011 [1215:last] | Using the Cygwin compilers turned out to be unnecessary, so I can get away with just the Cygwin base install plus make for the NDK, TDD-GCC for the host kit, and Git for Windows for the Git support. Only one set of compilers per target platform, but 3 mostly duplicated sets of general command line tools. |
older | first |