World: r3wp
[!REBOL3]
older newer | first last |
Pekr 3-Feb-2010 [399x2] | .... some ppl also requested enhanced /library interface being done as an extension. I started by donating 100USD, and now we are at someting like 400 USD ppl would pay for such a feature. So, what do we sponsor next? :-) |
... but ... I think that A97 should lower the number of CC non-solved tickets. There is plenty of them added recently ... | |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [401x4] | A GUI table would be nice ... |
nearly a month after Carl said he was going to work on a new alpha | |
>> chat Fetching chat... Cannot load chat from web. | |
Can't reach rebol.com and rebol.net ... | |
Sunanda 3-Feb-2010 [405] | chat / com / net -- all working from where I am. |
Henrik 3-Feb-2010 [406] | no problems here |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [407x3] | Well, that was odd ... and I couldn't see any r3 updates either! |
Hmm... still down for me after rebooting | |
So Carl .. hostkit ... | |
Carl 3-Feb-2010 [410] | Yes? |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [411x2] | that's what we feel you need to work on first! |
concensus ... | |
Carl 3-Feb-2010 [413] | Good to know. |
Paul 4-Feb-2010 [414] | Hostkit? - we need some core bugs fixed. |
Pekr 4-Feb-2010 [415] | those fixes started. Look at CC, first 6 bugs fixed, and I hope the list of fixes will be even bigger for next version ... |
Paul 4-Feb-2010 [416] | Good I hope so. |
Henrik 4-Feb-2010 [417] | host kit will give a bit of parallel work done (Robert, Cyphre, BrianH and Maxim are all waiting), but I guess it's up to what motivates Carl currently. |
Paul 4-Feb-2010 [418] | If that is the case Henrik, then I'm all for hostkit to get built. I just don't want to see us have to keep building hostkits for minor changes. Better to make more changes to core and then less to hostkit unless the hostkit build will bring something new to the table as your implying. |
Henrik 4-Feb-2010 [419] | host kit will fix remaining graphics issues, which Cyphre is already preparing. It will also help prepare for a better console for all platforms. Robert and Maxim has done various implementations (OpenGL, SQLite) and are doing general tests. BrianH, I can't remember what he's doing... |
Pekr 4-Feb-2010 [420] | Fixed tickets now at 14 and counting :-) A good sign R3 is back in development, although over time we do have few tens of tickets to implement :-) |
Maxim 4-Feb-2010 [421] | btw, I will start working on a public R3 /library extension as of next week, its now on my agenda. |
Graham 4-Feb-2010 [422] | are you claiming the bounty? |
Maxim 4-Feb-2010 [423] | I guess I will. |
Graham 4-Feb-2010 [424] | I think it has to be delivered this year though ... |
Maxim 4-Feb-2010 [425x3] | a good thing its only february then ;-D |
but seriously, I'll start work on this next week, I'll report on my progress. | |
The idea here is not build a prototype, but a "end-user" product. | |
Graham 4-Feb-2010 [428] | Chinese new year ... starts in 9 days ... you don't have much time |
Janko 4-Feb-2010 [429] | Maxim: great! |
WuJian 4-Feb-2010 [430] | haha |
Graham 4-Feb-2010 [431] | I was going to have a look at the R3 gui sources but they're all flattened.. Is there a pretty print for r3? |
WuJian 4-Feb-2010 [432x2] | A script can do the job, I forgot where I'd seen it |
http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=clean-script.r | |
Graham 4-Feb-2010 [434x2] | Doesn't work on R3 source |
Actually it doesn't work well on R2 source either! | |
WuJian 4-Feb-2010 [436] | ah... |
Graham 4-Feb-2010 [437] | chokes on obj/:word which is new syntax inroduced after that script was written |
Pavel 5-Feb-2010 [438] | Is it week in year day in year function available in rebol? I've found that very messy standards for week in year calculation. There are minimally 3 views to what first week in year really is, combined with the first day in week rule. (in different words there must be two switches to function would be universaly useable) funny but sometimes necessary. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [439] | There is /weekday |
Ashley 5-Feb-2010 [440] | >> scalar! == make typeset! [integer! decimal! percent! money! char! pair! tuple! time!] >> to integer! 0 == 0 >> to decimal! 0 == 0.0 >> to percent! 0 == 0% >> to money! 0 == $0 >> to char! 0 == #"^@" >> to pair! 0 == 0x0 >> to tuple! 0 ** Script error: cannot MAKE/TO tuple! from: 0 ** Where: to ** Near: to tuple! 0 >> to time! 0 == 0:00 Should tuple! default to 0.0.0 ? |
Sunanda 5-Feb-2010 [441] | tuple 0 error: It is consistent with R2 -- but that only does not make it right (see CC #666) |
Ashley 5-Feb-2010 [442] | >> power 2 2 == 4.0 Shouldn't this return integer! where possible? |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [443] | >> to-integer copy/part tmp: to-string power 2 2 find tmp "." == 4 :-) |
Ashley 5-Feb-2010 [444] | Or: to integer! power 2 2 |
Sunanda 5-Feb-2010 [445] | That produces an error for higher values of 2. This should produce an int when it can, and a dec when it can't, though only for positive values of 2: pow: func [a b /local res][attempt [res: to-integer res: power a b] res] |
Mchean 5-Feb-2010 [446] | is Android and the iPhone platforms under consideration? |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [447] | yes, it is in priority plan, to get build for ARM and possibly other platforms ... |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [448] | hmm... is it possible to remove messages in R3 chat? I saw Ladislav posting this header: > 6843 Re #6839: round/half-ceiling -$100.5000000 26 ladislav 18m ago But now it's gone from my chat view. |
older newer | first last |