World: r3wp
[!REBOL3]
older newer | first last |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [176] | Well, no wonder there's no one else left at RT |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [177x2] | and sometimes leaving a problem alone for a while allows a much better solution present itself. |
to present | |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [179] | R3 is not going to be finished by one person ... the whole point was to involve the community. |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [180] | well, it seems to me the community is plenty involved, but it could be a bit better. |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [181] | Blocking the community by working on the website just seems incompatible with that aim |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [182] | I'm not sure how that blocks the community. Did curecode stop working? |
Pekr 26-Jan-2010 [183x2] | I agree with Graham - in fact it is highly demotivating and frustrating situation. Some points of my analysis are ignored, and exactly predictable. When website redo and 2.x upgrade was announced, I knew exactly what happens and what it means for R3. Not a one week halt, but it is stalled for more than one month already. |
Why do we always stop at 95% of the subsystem completness? | |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [185] | Normally things stop at 90-95% because they're too difficult |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [186] | Sorry, I'm playing devil's advocate here. But, really, there is still a ton of things to do that doesn't involve Carl. The function reference manual is only 30% done and that took me a week to do. So why don't a couple of people here continue the work? I won't have time for the next few months. Carl has asked for this several times, and this is something that really needs to be done. |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [187] | Henrik ... do we even have a license? |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [188] | To what? |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [189] | for r3 |
Pekr 26-Jan-2010 [190] | Henrik - maybe ppl too want to choose, what they work on? :-) E.g. Graham started the work on Schemes. He really SHOULD (and was supposed to be) supported. Nothin happened. Robert throwed some Extension related questions to R3 Chat - no answers too ... |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [191] | A number of us said that R3 chat was a waste of resources ... and ... now, barely anyone uses it. |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [192] | So people can choose what to work on and Carl can't? |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [193x2] | Carl can do what he wants .. and that's the problem |
His choices are illogical | |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [195x2] | Pekr, Graham knows more about schemes and protocols now than he did before. I'd say there is a win there. |
Graham, so should we shut down the open R3 chat, which you and I can fix bugs in and use the AltME that people don't like because it's closed source? | |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [197x3] | There's no win if I can't use it for anything ... |
Might as well shut down R3 chat as Carl isn't using it .. and that was supposed to be his communication channel | |
Questions go unanswered ... | |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [200x2] | Well, you have the knowledge now. |
Who says that Carl isn't using it? I see some private messages trickling in once in a while. And Graham, you didn't respond to my question that I posted there 3 hours ago to help resolve the document editing situation on rebol.com. | |
Pekr 26-Jan-2010 [202] | Henrik - what are you talking about? Graham asked for assistance, schemes were supposed to be "revised" to see, if we use correct aproach in order for Carl to be acceptable ... it was promissed ... but did not happened ... |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [203] | Pekr, then Graham should ask him again. |
Pekr 26-Jan-2010 [204] | Henrik: WHERE? :-) |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [205] | R3 chat... |
Pekr 26-Jan-2010 [206] | ok, Graham, please do so :-) |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [207x2] | I didn't see any questions ... |
I have no special rights ... | |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [209] | you don't need special rights to read message #6739. |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [210] | How was I supposed to know that your message was in response to my statement from 2 weeks ago??? |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [211] | Type "6739", press Enter, press J and the previous author is Graham. |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [212] | Wouldn't it be simpler if you put my name in the sentence so that I know you are talking to me? |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [213] | I can do that next time. |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [214] | Anyway I was able to edit this page http://www.rebol.com/r3/docs/functions/read.html because my r3 chat rating was 50 |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [215] | That's a manual page, so that looks OK. Can you edit a page like this one: http://www.rebol.com/rebol3/ |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [216] | To edit a page, you need a "edit" menu on the page |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [217] | try clicking the red box on the upper right corner |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [218] | Yes ... |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [219] | ok? I get: "Restricted action. You have attempted to access a section of this website that requires administrative access." |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [220] | on what page? |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [221x2] | on that page I linked to above. |
when clicking the red box in the upper right corner | |
Graham 26-Jan-2010 [223x2] | Oh ... is that what you meant by red box |
http://www.rebol.com/r3/docs/functions/read.html see the word "edit" top right ... I think that's the only time you can edit a page | |
Henrik 26-Jan-2010 [225] | I think the point is that we should be able to edit those pages too, but it seems not to be the case right now. |
older newer | first last |