World: r3wp

this is for the alpha? and not for a105 ?

tested for a97, but if it runs under a105, then that's ok.

Doesn't

** Script error: path space/1 is not valid for none! type

** Where: applier apply use show unless show-now do-event either 
applier wake-up

 loop applier wait do-events if view either create-dialog do switch 
 applier appl

y if foreach if do-face if actor all do-style if do-event do-event 
do-event eith

er applier wake-up loop applier wait do-events if view catch either 
either appli
er do
** Near:

>>

Version:   2.100.97.3.1

that is the resize bug mentioned a couple of pages back, also in 
the queue.

uhh.. ok

and for A105

>> do %r3-gui.r3
Script: "Untitled" Version: none Date: none
** Script error: expected command! not font

** Where: size-text font-char-size? make make-text-style parse fontize 
catch eit
her either applier do
** Near: size-text gob

command! issue, also in the queue.

I take it that this is a hidden queue

Cyphre's and Ladislav's private queue

They like to share things like that

I hope they have a way of integrating back to CC later on!

it's not a formal release. I decided to do this, because the build 
system became available for use internally today.

and Robert agreed.

Highwe boundary

:)

http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/files/r3/gui/validation-prototype.html

sorry, file is moved

http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/files/r3/gui/docs/validation-prototype.html

and now also:


http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/files/r3/gui/docs/dialogs-prototype.html

perhaps it's best to ignore the dialogs-prototype document. it contains 
concepts that didn't make it to prototype.

Any R3VIDs available for playing with yet?
 ... I'm still experimenting, but nothing in a useable state.

Do yo remember Guys, some button's skins filled with some water bubbles.
I can't remember who did thoses.

Gabby did some bubbles ...

filled with water bubbles? do you mean like aqua?

If I knew, I would not ask :-)

well, did you see the images?

henrik (and I) did a few aqua-esque AGG driven buttons.

I've actually done many different setups which use jewel type controls.

link plz

I don't remember henrik's initial stuff...  adaptations of these 
are on rebol.org via glayout.

I don't think I've done anything with bubbles.

I'm refering to that old script you'd done which generated nice jewel 
graphics for use in any code.

yes, they weren't bubbles, AFAIR.

http://rebol.hmkdesign.dK/files/r2/draw/cool-widgets-2.r

That is, Thanks a lot

You should use them for the R3 Gui.
Just my opinion

I agree wholeheartedly.

well, they were just a test of what DRAW could do. I have something 
hopefully better in mind. :-)

the glowing effect is perfect on the bottom ones

that part is not so difficult. it's more difficult to get a style 
that works in both high and low contrast and with many different 
colors. much of what is in that script is hardcoded.

my experience too.  the other hard to handle effect is handling saturad 
and unsaturated colors equally well.

http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/files/r3/gui/026.png


Some of the last glow stuff I did which is not hardcoded, but done 
using a real material system with calculated specular highlight.

handling saturad and unsaturated colors equally well.
 - precisely

http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/files/r3/gui/143.png


It'll probably be closer to this. I find a good source of inspiration 
in this skin that can yield some interesting results.

On my laptop, they are not rendered "equally", I mean some color 
combinations are glowing, but others not.

steeve, yes, that's one of the troubles I have yet to solve.

yep... in my experience ... back face glowing is the hardest color 
staturation issue to solve  :-)


we must not think in terme of color but energy, which is related 
to gamma and brightness of the color saturation (probably even channel 
based, since green is perceived twice or fourtimes a smuch as blue 
and red)

which is why red catches our eyes much more... we are actualy bad 
at red color differentiation  so even small tints of red are much 
more apparent.

yes, true

(and why green is used AS-IS in for black and white TVs)  


its also why we use green billboards for road signs... cause we can 
distinguish them from much further away...

color bleeding from the atmosphere can easily be filtered out from 
vision which isn't true as true for blue and even less for red.

also note that wavelenghts for red don't penetrate as well thru blue 
IIRC... so a red sign under water appears black at a VERY short distance... 
something like 30meters IIRC.