r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3 GUI]

Pekr
5-Feb-2010
[272]
we had one other word to "options" IIRC. I just can't remember it 
now. It was used for top gob (window) parameters ... then we unified 
to options ... what was it?
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[273]
There is no occurence of the word 'parameter in the r3 source
Pekr
5-Feb-2010
[274x2]
ah, forget it, it was "flags" ... but that is something different 
...
So - we already started continuation work on Carl's VID? :-)
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[276]
we are free to make suggestions... but it would be nice with a place 
to store them.
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[277x2]
or we could use 

text-list settings [ ... ]
insread of options
Pekr, I'm the last person to make GUi contributions!
Pekr
5-Feb-2010
[279]
settings is even better ...
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[280]
settings is a better word than options because options is not really 
an option ... since they already occur.  You are setting them.
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[281]
you have to type more characters (Carl is critical of that)
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[282x2]
Luckily there is very little GUI code out there so it's easy to change 
:)
hehe .. .one more character!
Pekr
5-Feb-2010
[284]
yes, Carl is critical about that. I can understand that ... and then 
we have words like 'with, etc. :-)
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[285x2]
not a good argument if it leads to confusion
VID was confusing for all newbies .. clarity is essential
Pekr
5-Feb-2010
[287]
exactly ... I think, that what we are aiming at, is natural understanding 
of written GUI code. When reading the code, strange words should 
not disrupt my flow of thoughts ...
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[288x2]
I don't like 'facets either ...
What does it mean??
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[290]
facets are any standard part of the face.
Pekr
5-Feb-2010
[291]
I never liked facets too :-) I remember it being regular english 
word, but I once again don't remember its meaning. So for me it is 
pure only REBOL word :-)
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[292x2]
there is a distinction between standard parts, which are inherited 
throughout many faces and private parts for each face instance.
I have no problem with it, perhaps because it's also a Danish word. 
:-)
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[294x2]
so call it 'parts instead
I really don't understand the need to invent a new vocabulary
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[296]
facets is also used in VID. it's an old term.
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[297x2]
Yes, I know that ..
And I never liked it then
Pekr
5-Feb-2010
[299]
Graham - then we might replace words like face, feel, engage, etc. 
:-)
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[300]
Feel and engage are gone in R3. They are replaced by actors.
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[301]
Yep ... .let's change everything
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[302]
when I read through the sources (which you can get, properly formatted 
and documented through R3 chat), I can see there probably needs to 
be a better distinction between 'facet and 'faced.
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[303]
a face is comprised of parts
vs
a face is comprised of facets
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[304x2]
that would sound more like you were talking about which GOBs it was 
made from.
a face is an object, and what does an object consist of?
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[306]
aspects
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[307]
'facet might be harder to change. I assume Carl chose this name, 
because it's closely related to FACE and we have GET-FACE and GET-FACET 
functions, which I find to be very clear.
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[308x2]
and too easier to mix up ?
facet 


. One of the flat polished surfaces cut on a gemstone or occurring 
naturally on a crystal.
2. Anatomy A small, smooth, flat surface, as on a bone or tooth.

3. Biology One of the lenslike visual units of a compound eye, as 
of an insect.

4. One of numerous aspects, as of a subject. See Synonyms at phase.
Pekr
5-Feb-2010
[310]
Well, to be honest, while Graham is imo right, that especially to 
novices, better wording could mean faster learning curve, I also 
have to say, that it is not the most important topic. Finishing VID 
is :-) I would like to see incorporated Carl's planned changes, and 
other subsystems being built-in (still not mechanisms for tabbing, 
accelerator keys display (can be done via layer), full keyboard navigaton 
etc.)
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[311]
I don't agree. I've built quite a few styles in R3 now, and I've 
not once mixed up FACE and FACET, particularly because the path FACE/FACETS 
exists. I find it to be a pretty natural word to use.
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[312]
Aspect

1.. appearance to the eye; visual effect the physical aspect of the 
landscape

2. a distinct feature or element in a problem, situation, etc.; facet 
to consider every aspect of a problem

3. the way in which a problem, idea, etc., may be considered to consider 
a problem from every aspect
4. a facial expression; manner of appearing a severe aspect

5. a position facing a particular direction; outlook the southern 
aspect of a house

6. a view in a certain direction a good aspect of the village from 
the tower

7. a surface that faces in a given direction the ventral aspect of 
a fish

8. (Spirituality, New Age, Astrology & Self-help / Astrology) Astrology 
any of several specific angular distances between two planets or 
a planet and the Ascendant or Midheaven measured, from the earth, 
in degrees along the ecliptic

9. (Linguistics / Grammar) Grammar a category of verbs or verbal 
inflections that expresses such features as the continuity, repetition, 
or completedness of the action described Compare perfective [2] progressive 
[8] [10]
10. (Life Sciences & Allied Applications / Botany) Botany

a.  the compass direction to which a plant habitat is exposed, or 
the degree of exposure
b.  the effect of the seasons on the appearance of plants
11. Archaic glance or gaze
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[313]
it's much easier to confuse FACET and FACED.
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[314]
face ... facet .. faced ....
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[315]
Aspect is also talked about in aspect ratio, which could become a 
function in R3, like it is in the VID Extension Kit.
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[316]
way too confusing
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[317]
I don't agree... but then again, I've written a lot of styles. It 
may appear confusing to beginners.
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[318]
We're not talking about experts!
Henrik
5-Feb-2010
[319]
Styles are built by experts. Beginners won't see the word in layouts.
Graham
5-Feb-2010
[320x2]
I think that's the wrong attitude
Henrik, where are your styles?