World: r3wp
[!REBOL3 Schemes] Implementors guide
older newer | first last |
Pekr 15-Jan-2010 [1570] | Is puty correctly (in regards to R3) licensed? BSD or LGPL? |
Maxim 15-Jan-2010 [1571] | MIT |
Graham 15-Jan-2010 [1572] | I don't care whether it's MIT or GPL ... as long as we can call it. |
Maxim 15-Jan-2010 [1573] | and its code is beautifull, it even has its own implementation of zlib... it rellies on no external lib or code. |
Pekr 15-Jan-2010 [1574] | Graham - how can't you care? If it woudl be GPL, we could not use it at all ... |
Graham 15-Jan-2010 [1575] | We as a RT may not ... but "we" as a user can ... |
Pekr 15-Jan-2010 [1576] | No, we can't. GPL is GPL. You either fit the license, or you break it, no? |
Graham 15-Jan-2010 [1577] | If I don't distibute I can do what I like ... |
Rebolek 16-Jan-2010 [1578] | Better break the license than some glass. |
Graham 16-Jan-2010 [1579] | GPL only applies to software that you distribute |
BrianH 16-Jan-2010 [1580x2] | Pekr, "just wrapping" other code is not easy to do right, and takes time and effort. Less time and effort than rewiting it from scratch in some cases (likely including SSL and SSH), but still not a trivial effort. |
Graham, a scheme that you can't distribute is of extremely limited use, too limited to justify the effort involved. | |
Graham 16-Jan-2010 [1582x4] | in your personal opinion of course |
If google developed such a scheme, and kept it within their organization, that would be in keeping with GPL .. no need to release source | |
what I was envisaging was someone linking the host code to eg. a gpl tls library and releasing instructions on how to build it yourself. | |
I don't see what is wrong with that. | |
BrianH 16-Jan-2010 [1586] | All right, too limited to justify *my* effort. Or anyone who doesn't work for a large company. |
Graham 16-Jan-2010 [1587] | I guess I just may have to get that book C for dummies from the library after all |
Maxim 16-Jan-2010 [1588] | hehe |
Graham 16-Jan-2010 [1589] | Max, where's that progress report ...?? |
Maxim 16-Jan-2010 [1590] | progress on OpenGL? |
BrianH 16-Jan-2010 [1591x2] | I don't see the point in this anyways, since there are decent SSL and SSH libraries with permissive licenses. We can ignore GPL code. |
Still, I don't want to disuade you from brushing up on your C :) | |
Graham 16-Jan-2010 [1593x3] | starting .. not brushing up |
yes, OpenGL | |
Have you created a GUI to replace VID using open GL yet ? | |
Maxim 16-Jan-2010 [1596] | as I explained to sunanda, while doing the OpenGL port I decided to build my C code analyzer/compiler/converter to make the process as complete and painless as possible... but I've hit a wall and need a better unit testing engine to complete that and the OpenGL convertion. |
Graham 16-Jan-2010 [1597x2] | so you're stuck ...? |
What about Qt ? Is that feasible? | |
Maxim 16-Jan-2010 [1599x4] | I've used that before but its more pain than gain. |
I'm not really stuck, i'm just building a highway instead of a small road... so it takes a bit more ground work. | |
but the result will be 3 tools instead of one... and about the same time to accomplish the end goal. | |
and then the ability to create complete C extensions for just about any C useable tools in a few minutes. | |
Graham 16-Jan-2010 [1603] | sounds like grandiose ideation ! :) |
Maxim 16-Jan-2010 [1604x4] | no its how every other platform does it. |
using tools like SWIG. | |
I want to do it using REBOL end-to-end. | |
and since the C analyser has a programable emitter, you will be able to customize what it does. | |
Graham 16-Jan-2010 [1608] | What's the ETA for this? Knowing that you start university this week ... |
Maxim 16-Jan-2010 [1609x2] | honestly I don't know, but its a funded project overall, so it is my current job. which means it will happen for sure. I would love to have some usefull OpenGL stuff working in february. |
one reason I'm doing Sea (the C converter) is that for each new improvement of extensions, we will be able to update our tools with a single rebuild of the extension. for large libs this is going to be a big deal. | |
Graham 16-Jan-2010 [1611] | is the funding contingent on delivery ? :) |
Maxim 16-Jan-2010 [1612] | well, usually, you get paid to get things done. but this is an ongoing project. It also has other libraries I must import which I can't talk about right now, but which might be very interesting for the community. |
Graham 17-Jan-2010 [1613x3] | As I said above I don't use imap, and am not familiar with the protocol. All this does is login using auth=login and grabs the first mail in the Inbox http://rebol.wik.is/Rebol3/Schemes/Imap4 |
I don't parse any of the message flags etc. | |
Ok, what do we need for imap? ( although I suspect doing all these email schemes is a waste of time without ssl ) ... | |
Andreas 17-Jan-2010 [1616] | for developing, stunnel will help with immediate ssl issues |
Maxim 17-Jan-2010 [1617] | ssl AFAIK is under the protocol, so even with an SSL module, the schema should not really change. |
Graham 17-Jan-2010 [1618x2] | stunnel adds transparency ... I guess |
anyone got a how to on using stunnel ? | |
older newer | first last |