World: r3wp
[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases
older newer | first last |
james_nak 26-Sep-2008 [348] | Sqlab, OK, I gave your odbc-lib a shot. So far so good. Thanks. I'll be doing some more testing over the weekend. If you know of any quirks, please let me know. I'm pretty much an "insert" and "Select" SQL guy so it should be fine. Thanks again. |
Brock 26-Sep-2008 [349] | sqlab - can I get a copy of your ODBC-lib as well? The email address inmy profie is valid. |
sqlab 29-Sep-2008 [350] | on the way |
james_nak 7-Oct-2008 [351] | Does anyone know how the 2.7 SDK is distributed to previous SDK owners? |
Henrik 7-Oct-2008 [352x2] | Aren't you able to freely download the latest SDK binaries? |
From the same directory as the ordinary binaries from rebol.net | |
james_nak 7-Oct-2008 [354x2] | You know I thought I saw that but this morning I went to the main site and that's pretty much the same as it always has been. Thanks. I'll take a look. |
Henrik, thanks. There she was! | |
james_nak 9-Oct-2008 [356] | Is it possible to hide a button that is the button one just pressed? my_button: btn "test" [hide my_button] |
Pekr 9-Oct-2008 [357] | it is probably better to not hide the button, but to disable it. You can find enable/disable script on rebol.org .... |
james_nak 9-Oct-2008 [358] | Thanks Pekr |
Gregg 9-Oct-2008 [359] | You have to be a ltitle tricky to hide it James, because it wants to redraw when you release the mouse button. In the past, I've set up a central handler and states to control what is shown, then your action just sets the state you want and the button will be hidden on the next pass (timer event). |
james_nak 9-Oct-2008 [360] | Thanks Gregg, that is tricky. Well, it wasn't a super important item so I ended up using the enable/disable. Thanks anyway. |
Anton 9-Oct-2008 [361] | http://anton.wildit.net.au/rebol/gui/self-hider-btn.r |
james_nak 10-Oct-2008 [362] | Even Better. Thanks Anton. You sure make some cool stuff. |
Anton 10-Oct-2008 [363] | Thankyou James. |
james_nak 23-Oct-2008 [364] | Has anyone ever seen the "Call" word not work? I've been trying to simply call %/c/rebol/view.exe and it shows up in task manager but I never see the application. It's not just that particular app either. The funny thing is I was successful doing that at my work computer. |
Graham 23-Oct-2008 [365x2] | yes |
try one of the options like call/show | |
james_nak 23-Oct-2008 [367x2] | Any idea why? |
OK. | |
Graham 23-Oct-2008 [369] | bug |
james_nak 23-Oct-2008 [370] | Good idea Doc. That worked. |
Gregg 23-Oct-2008 [371] | The show option, and hiding the shell window by default, was a change in new releases. |
james_nak 23-Oct-2008 [372] | But if I'm not mistaken, you can't stop the shell window from flashing. The problem I was having was that the program I was calling wasn't showing up at all. |
BrianH 23-Oct-2008 [373] | Q: "Any idea why?" call/show A: Most of the time call is used to run background processes, and REBOL <= 2.7.6 did not give you the option, always flashing that shell window. Starting with 2.7.7 the called app (and the shell window) is not shown by default. |
Graham 24-Oct-2008 [374x2] | I was the first to report this problem |
See posts from the 21-Mar-2008 and we talk about call, call/show and call/shell | |
amacleod 24-Oct-2008 [376] | Is 2.7.7 released? |
BrianH 24-Oct-2008 [377x3] | No, and work on it has barely started. We will have a public development release of the new R3 GUI first. |
Some of the same people are the ones doing development on both. Priorities :) | |
Sorry, my answer above about call was wrong. It was fixed in 2.7.6. | |
RobertS 22-May-2009 [380] | . |
Tomc 2-Jun-2009 [381] | Hi, For homework, I was asked about the random number generator in my favorite language ... did some experiments but answered closed source to what "algorithm does it use?" for this part, I got a zero. So, could someone with access to rebol source or internal doc get me information on the algorithms for 'random and 'random/secure they are probably some flavor of linear congruent generators (please don't say RANDU) but multiplictive? or mixed? maybe a PMMLCG? shuffling? QCG? MRG? What constants are used? what is the period? how many streams? The easiest on you would be just send me the source and let me figure it out but is that is verboten as much detail as you may send to me (privately) would be appreciated note: the information will only be seen in a distilled form by my professor and not kept by me. thanks Tom |
Ladislav 2-Jun-2009 [382x3] | Hi Tom, I think, that the best what can be done is to put this to CureCode (R3 uses the same algorithm, I guess) as a documentation bug |
posted to CureCode as #879 | |
please use CureCode to add any comments, or even suggestions how to change the implementation | |
Henrik 2-Jun-2009 [385] | Updated headline to be slightly clearer. :-) |
Ladislav 2-Jun-2009 [386] | :-D |
Henrik 2-Jun-2009 [387] | Good that we don't have an undocumented NO or SOME function :-) |
Ladislav 2-Jun-2009 [388x2] | ROTFL |
Random: I have a simulation, where I use www.random.org data to make sure I am truly random | |
Tomc 2-Jun-2009 [390] | Hi Ladislav welcome back I have no idea what curecode is , assume it is rambo5 or whatever I don't need random numbers myself at the moment (I sometimes use hotbits ) I need to answer a homework question with something other than "don't know" I will go try to find out about curecode |
Henrik 2-Jun-2009 [391] | Tomc: http://curecode.org/rebol3/view-tickets.rsp |
BrianH 2-Jun-2009 [392x2] | Tomc, look here for the answer, though you might need to do some math: http://curecode.org/rebol3/ticket.rsp?id=879 |
Copied here: Answer: currently, there are two primary random generators: 1. old method, high speed, simple multiplicative: next = next * 1103515245L + 12345L; tmp = next & 0xffff0000; next = next * 1103515245L + 12345L; tmp |= (next >> 16); 2. much slower, SHA1() of a repeating pattern of the integer bytes (20 bytes total). | |
GiuseppeC 2-Jun-2009 [394] | Hello, I have big conceptual problems with REBOL objects. They differ a lot from common OOP. Inheritance is done by copying, no accessors, function redefinitions needs binding, the object is composed of multiple blocks and I don't know how REBOL compiler interprets them. |
BrianH 2-Jun-2009 [395] | They don't differ that much from standard prototype-based OOP. The only difference is that delegation is done manually. |
GiuseppeC 2-Jun-2009 [396] | I really ask myself why the REBOL object model is so different than standard OOP. I need some very good documentation but I have fount it nowhere. Does it exists ? Is it one of the best kept secrets ? I have read that someone was able to buil a full class system using REBOL with multiple inheritance but this is a myth for me. |
BrianH 2-Jun-2009 [397] | It only differs from class-based OOP. There are at least 3 standards for OOP, and only class-based OOP has inheritance. |
older newer | first last |