World: r3wp
[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases
older newer | first last |
nve 12-Dec-2010 [2125] | so it's apport from rebol3 ? is it still usefull to have a R2-Beta world or move into a group of rebol3 ? How to join R2-Beta ? |
Oldes 12-Dec-2010 [2126] | It was used for chat about R2 bug fixing, but Carl is not visiting it anymore. |
nve 12-Dec-2010 [2127] | So a new group group in rebol3 world ? |
Oldes 12-Dec-2010 [2128] | I think that Carl, Gabriele or BrianH can give you R2-beta access. If you need to report R2 bug, you can use any (not R3 related) group here and submit it into Rambo. |
Henrik 12-Dec-2010 [2129] | Yes, Rambo is still the best option for R2 bugs. |
Oldes 12-Dec-2010 [2130x2] | I think the r2-beta world can go alive again if Carl would like to participate and next round of the R2 improvement. |
The main difference between r2-beta and this world is, that it's allowed to upload files on r2-beta and it was used to give us pre-official releases. | |
BrianH 12-Dec-2010 [2132] | It might come to that, but I am hoping to keep using this group as long as possible to manage the R2 release discussions. |
BrianH 30-Dec-2010 [2133x3] | We've been working on 2.7.8 today, and the test builds look good. New stuff coming from R2/Forward :) |
Does ACCESS-OS do anything on Windows? | |
(Whoops, wrong group) | |
Pekr 31-Dec-2010 [2136] | what is 2.7.8 going to address? Was the release needed? :-) |
GrahamC 31-Dec-2010 [2137x2] | Hope the odbc date bug is fixed ... |
Pekr, yes, most serious developers are using R2 for production use | |
nve 31-Dec-2010 [2139] | And hope the design of View will be refreshed as what has been bone by Carl in march ! Cool design ! http://www.rebol.com/r3/docs/gui/guide.html |
Henrik 31-Dec-2010 [2140] | Unfortunately R2 View is completely unrelated to R3 View, so it's not likely that any improvements will occur here. |
nve 31-Dec-2010 [2141] | Just change design... there was button, after btn with different design. We need a refresh of the design of R2, to make it younger... The screenshoots of R3 GUI by Carl are cool. |
Pekr 31-Dec-2010 [2142] | nve - that will not simply happen imo. And even Carl's experimental skin (which I initially did not like) is no more available to even R3 View. So far we have got ugly glossy hybrid skin, which is here to ease development, so definitelly not final :-) |
Henrik 31-Dec-2010 [2143] | Refreshing R2 View is a huge amount of work (I spent almost a year building an extension of it) and IMHO not worth it. The look of R2 View is one of its smaller problems. |
nve 31-Dec-2010 [2144] | The look of R2 View is one of its smaller problems. => OK, but we are in 2011 (already for some, in a couple of hours for the others). An look is important. Apple and Steve Jobs show how it is important. |
Henrik 31-Dec-2010 [2145] | A good look will be possible for R3 to do. It's simply a waste of time for R2 and you can't produce anything that resembles Aqua anyway in R2. In R3 that is possible. But focusing on look alone is a big mistake, which too many developers using GUI systems are suffering under. |
Pekr 31-Dec-2010 [2146] | nve - what is Henrik trying to point out imo, is the fact, that it is not that easy to change look of R2 VID and stay consistent. I think that with VID3 it is going to be easier, as the system is more and better abstracted. It might be easier to do the job for R3, than to R2. I believe R3 is going into beta sometimes ... when Carl re-appears + 2-3 months :-) |
GiuseppeC 31-Dec-2010 [2147] | Rebol2 is quite a closed project. It needs only maintaining and updating activity. No more core changes. |
BrianH 31-Dec-2010 [2148x2] | We will not be delaying 2.7.8 to update the appearance of View :) |
Some of what is coming in 2.7.8: - Bug fixes and enhancements to improve Cheyenne, and other apps that have to do similar stuff. - Some native fixes for non-Windows platforms, particularly Linux. - Environment variable stuff: GET-ENV expansion on Windows, SET-ENV, LIST-ENV - Function fixes: RUN enabled, LIST-REG/values, possibly TO-LOCAL-FILE - R2/Forward: FUNCT/extern, LAST?, COLLECT-WORDS, EXTRACT fixes, ASCII? fixes, LATIN1? fixes, INVALID-UTF?, CD, LS, MORE, PWD, RM - (Still pending) Natives: ASSERT, APPLY, RESOLVE, FOREACH set-word support | |
GiuseppeC 31-Dec-2010 [2150] | wow, worth waiting for updating UltraEdit Wordfile |
GrahamC 31-Dec-2010 [2151x2] | Some of the registry stuff is broken on R2/command .. hope they are fixed and not just enabled |
One of the things we would like to do is easily detect all installed fonts in windows, and install new fonts | |
BrianH 31-Dec-2010 [2153] | Have the registry bugs been reported? If not, do so here or in RAMBO. (I am a bit new to the RAMBO admin process.) |
GrahamC 31-Dec-2010 [2154x4] | I have reported them ... just checking to see where |
Ok, it wasn't rambo | |
This is from August in the SDK group Trying to see if .net is installed but this gives me an empty block foreach key keys: list-reg/HKLM "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\5.0\User Agent\Post Platform" [ print key ] even though I can see it full of keys in the registry ... | |
And from View in Sept 26 and ... keys: list-reg/HKLM "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Fonts" probe keys keys: get-reg/HKLM "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Fonts" "URW Palladio L Italic (TrueType)" probe keys keys: exists-reg?/HKLM "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Fonts\URW Palladio L Italic (TrueType)" probe keys produces this [] URWPA32_0.TTF false | |
BrianH 31-Dec-2010 [2158x2] | Those are not keys, those are values. LIST-REG/values will get those. |
Btw, the registry functions are still not made available in regular /View, for the same security reasons as before. | |
BrianH 1-Jan-2011 [2160x2] | 2.7.8 released! http://www.rebol.com/article/0502.htmlHappy New Year! |
At least for Windows so far. Things that didn't make it in this version: - The TO-LOCAL-FILE fix for Windows UNC paths - FOREACH set-word support - ASSERT, APPLY and RESOLVE are still mezzanine But as a bonus, we got SELECT and FIND on objects, and that is better than any of those others :) | |
Kaj 1-Jan-2011 [2162] | Congrats |
GrahamC 1-Jan-2011 [2163] | where's the fix log? |
BrianH 1-Jan-2011 [2164] | Hasn't been updated yet. |
GrahamC 2-Jan-2011 [2165] | Give us a bone |
Claude 2-Jan-2011 [2166] | and for linux ????? |
nve 2-Jan-2011 [2167] | What is the plan for next release ? Do we need to post bug/request on RAMBO ? |
Oldes 2-Jan-2011 [2168] | I think so. RAMBO is still the only offical bug report for R2 |
nve 2-Jan-2011 [2169] | OK. Thx |
Pekr 2-Jan-2011 [2170x2] | I miss a detailed change-log, as we can see it for R3 .... |
I can find this one, but not sure what got implemented in the end - http://www.rebol.com/docs/changes-2-7.html | |
Oldes 2-Jan-2011 [2172x2] | I understand Brian's answer that it will be available, but it's simply not done yet. |
Btw.. it would be nice to port the bugs from old tired Rambo to the CureCode hospital, where it's pretty visible which bug is fixed and if the fix is tested as well. | |
MikeL 2-Jan-2011 [2174] | Is the download page for 2.7.8 easy to find? |
older newer | first last |