r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL2 Releases] Discuss 2.x releases

Graham
16-Mar-2010
[1194x2]
There's a rebcmd with ssl that is part of rebol/command of course 
... I was guessing Carl was keeping it that way.
Geomol, that issue is fixed.
Gregg
16-Mar-2010
[1196]
Thanks Brian.
Gabriele
16-Mar-2010
[1197x3]
Found a random bug in 2.7.6 with AS-STRING...
http://rebol-power-mez.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/rebol-power-mez/rebol-power-mez/rev/beaac6a1fd12
If anybody can get Carl to contact me... maybe we can figure out 
what's happening. I don't seem to be able to reproduce this outside 
of that so far.
Henrik
19-Mar-2010
[1200]
http://www.rebol.com/article/0466.html<- R2.7.8
Graham
19-Mar-2010
[1201]
I submitted my http patches for 2.7.7 ... and they have yet to be 
reviewed.  Suspect it's a waste of our time.
GiuseppeC
19-Mar-2010
[1202]
It seems they will be reviewed soon. http://www.rebol.com/docs/changes-2-7.html
Look at REBOL 2.7.8 last line
BrianH
19-Mar-2010
[1203]
Sorry, Graham, I've been busy helping a sick friend. Back at it now.
Graham
19-Mar-2010
[1204x2]
They're not fixes, they're enhancements ..
semantics
Micha
20-Mar-2010
[1206x3]
REBOL can not open more than 512 connections
sample code : loop 512 [ open/no-wait tcp://209.85.135.103:80]  ; 
result ok
if i open new port   open tcp://google.com:80  ; 513 ** Access Error: 
Cannot connect to google.com
Graham
20-Mar-2010
[1209]
Maybe it's your OS and not Rebol ?
Micha
20-Mar-2010
[1210]
rebol 2.7.7 , os windows serwer 2008 x64
Graham
20-Mar-2010
[1211]
rebol 2.7.6, windows 7 and I was able to exceed 512 connections
Micha
20-Mar-2010
[1212]
rebol  view 2.7.6 on windows serwer 2008 not open 513  connections
BrianH
20-Mar-2010
[1213]
Micha, does Windows Server 2008 have a connection quota feature? 
Perhaps per-user?
Micha
21-Mar-2010
[1214]
REBOL view on Windows can not establish more than 512 connectivity, 
i check 2.7.6 on windows XP
BrianH
21-Mar-2010
[1215]
Windows XP has connection quotas, but it's a fixed setting. Still, 
I'll check it here on one of my XP boxes.
Henrik
22-Mar-2010
[1216]
Has anyone used Edgar Tolentino's Imagemagick helper under 2.7.7? 
In WinXP I get REBOL saying:

---------------------------
REBOL/View: rebol.exe - Unable To Locate Component
---------------------------

This application has failed to start because X11.dll was not found. 
Re-installing the application may fix this problem. 
---------------------------
OK   
---------------------------
BrianH
22-Mar-2010
[1217x3]
That looks like LOAD/library %x11, something you would see on a Unix/Linux 
compatible script. IIRC Edgar wrote that for Qtask, which runs on 
Linux.
Sorry, load/library %X11 - it's case-sensitive on Linux.
The code should be easily adjustable to the Imagemagick port for 
Windows though.
Henrik
22-Mar-2010
[1220]
when I look in the script, there are load lines to uncomment depending 
on which version to load. it looks like this in my case:


imagemagicklib: %CORE_RL_magick_.dll          ; uncomment for windows 
version

imagemagickwandlib: %CORE_RL_wand_.dll          ; uncomment for windows 
version


; imagemagicklib: %/usr/lib/libMagick.so      ; uncomment for linux 
version, try to find where it is installed

; imagemagickwandlib: %/usr/lib/libWand.so      ; uncomment for linux 
version, try to find where it is installed
BrianH
22-Mar-2010
[1221]
Is he using the cygwin version of Imagemagick or the native version?
Henrik
22-Mar-2010
[1222]
it doesn't say anything about cygwin.
BrianH
22-Mar-2010
[1223]
The cygwin version would try to load X11.dll. The native version 
wouldn't.
Henrik
22-Mar-2010
[1224]
seems there are references to x11 in the DLLs. so that's the problem.
BrianH
22-Mar-2010
[1225x3]
You should track down the native binaries then - they don't have 
X11 references.
Try this: http://www.imagemagick.org/script/binary-releases.php?ImageMagick=m148pm1far9d2bsj0b5tpb9ui2#windows
If they do have X11 references let us know.
Henrik
22-Mar-2010
[1228x2]
trying to get the newest windows version now
amazing with so many different versions for a little bit of image 
processing...
BrianH
22-Mar-2010
[1230]
Welcome to the wonders of cross-platform code. There isn't a native 
version for Mac either: It uses X11.
Henrik
22-Mar-2010
[1231]
looks like the windows version is x11 free.
BrianH
22-Mar-2010
[1232]
Cool :)
Henrik
22-Mar-2010
[1233x2]
but the helper script states explicitly to use version 6.2.9, which 
is no longer available.
I assume Edgar doesn't have interest/time to update it?
BrianH
22-Mar-2010
[1235]
That would be in keeping with the work load at Qtask, as I recall. 
He's a busy guy.
Henrik
22-Mar-2010
[1236x2]
I think I'll just call the CLI version... don't need anything other 
than smooth downscaling and a few other bits.
a clean installation and call "convert" is enough to give access 
under windows, so that's good enough for me.
Graham
22-Mar-2010
[1238]
I use comlib for this .. but it probably doesn't do more than using 
covert as well
Gregg
22-Mar-2010
[1239]
I use CONVERT quite a bit, and it works well for me.
Edgar
23-Mar-2010
[1240]
The problem with ImageMagick was that the API was a moving target. 

So the script I submitted worked only for that specific version of 
ImageMagick.

Since Qtask is not currently using ImageMagick now, I don't know 
when I can get back to work on it again.

I suggest to do what Gregg is suggesting at this time.
Henrik
23-Mar-2010
[1241x3]
I'm follow Gregg's suggestion.
following
I'm building a simple dialect around it. I'm not sure I can make 
it 1:1 capable with CONVERT, but at least you would then be able 
to pass a standard REBOL block directly to CONVERT.

Example:


process [path %/z load %image.jpg blur 3x6 negate resize 50x50 save 
%image2.jpg]