World: r3wp
[!Cheyenne] Discussions about the Cheyenne Web Server
older newer | first last |
Dockimbel 2-Feb-2010 [7872] | That's very good Terry! |
Graham 6-Feb-2010 [7873x3] | Does Cheyenne's url-encode function correctly encode something like this "==" ? |
I tried the url-encode from the repository ... and it does nothing. It should do this >> url-encode "==" == "%3D%3D" | |
http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#8-MruDvODLg/trunk/UniServe/libs/html.r&q=url-encodepackage:http://cheyenne-server%5C.googlecode%5C.com&sa=N&cd=2&ct=rc&d=2 | |
Oldes 6-Feb-2010 [7876x2] | >> url-encode/all "==" == "%3D%3D" |
the switch /all includes also url-reserved: charset "&/:;=?@" as you can see in the code you have linked here:) | |
Graham 6-Feb-2010 [7878x2] | ahh .... |
so what's the point of not doing /all as default? | |
BrianH 6-Feb-2010 [7880x2] | Because those characters are url syntax, and encoding them would break the syntax. |
Particularly = and & would break url-encoded name/value pairs. | |
Graham 6-Feb-2010 [7882x2] | I encode each part of the url and then rejoin |
I guess his url-encode encodes the whole url .... | |
BrianH 6-Feb-2010 [7884] | Under those circumstances it's safe to se url-encode/all. |
Oldes 6-Feb-2010 [7885x2] | I do this as well with my own url-encode function as Graham as I consider it as more safe |
ech.. too many "as" ... must go to sleep :) | |
Oldes 7-Feb-2010 [7887x2] | What's the correct way how to deal with uploaded files? I mean... if I for example upload a very large file, then I must move it to correct location after upload is finished. What is the best way how to move a large file in the Cheyenne context? What about a possibility to set the custom %incoming/ location before download starts so no need for move will be required and we can just rename the file? |
I think that under Windows for fast file movement I can use: set 'MoveFile make routine! [ "Moves file using OS" lpExistingFileName [string!] lpNewFileName [string!] ] kernel32.dll "MoveFileA" But what about under Linux? Just a simple call? | |
Gabriele 7-Feb-2010 [7889] | RENAME, on same file system. if you don't want to care, call "mv" |
Gregg 7-Feb-2010 [7890] | And move-file won't be fast all the time. e.g. if you're moving the file to another drive. |
Will 7-Feb-2010 [7891x3] | here is from the change-log: RSP: new method 'store added to Request object. It simplifies uploaded files management by abstracting file's location (memory or disk). Example: request/store request/content/file %attached/ will save the uploaded file passed as "file" query parameter in %attached/ folder using the original name (!!watch out for security issues!!). request/store request/content/file %attached/my-file.bin will save the uploaded file with a forced name (original name needs to be saved separatedly if needed). |
latest svn use rename instead of call "mv xx".. | |
code is in cheyenne/handlers/RSP.r | |
Dockimbel 8-Feb-2010 [7894] | I'm currently reworking the response/store function. I'm considering dropping in-memory uploaded files mode, it was supposed to help processing uploaded data files (think CSV files for example) avoiding the disk write/read part, but it just adds complexity for a marginal gain. If anyone found that mode useful, please say so now. |
Oldes 8-Feb-2010 [7895x2] | I think the in-memory mode is not much needed for me. I was a little bit suprised why some files are in memory and other on disk. And usualy you would like to store the original file (for example the csv) before processing anyway. |
With the request/store - does it means that the rsp processing starts before the upload is finished = stops where the /store is called waiting on upload finish? | |
Graham 8-Feb-2010 [7897] | well, I have routines to check for in memory or on disk receipt .. |
Oldes 8-Feb-2010 [7898] | And do you save the in memory content? |
Graham 8-Feb-2010 [7899] | Usually do save it to disc ... |
Dockimbel 9-Feb-2010 [7900] | When uploading a file, the RSP script is called when the upload is completed. |
Terry 11-Feb-2010 [7901] | speaking of uploads.. try it with this.. http://www.plupload.com/example_queuewidget.php |
jrichards 12-Feb-2010 [7902] | In the config file is worker-libs contained within globals or should it be preceding globals. Trying to get mysql working. |
james_nak 12-Feb-2010 [7903] | If you're referring to the httpd.cfg file, I don't have any references to mysql except for those referring to actual databases. What I did to test mysql was use the rebol mysql driver (in a normal rebol shell) outside of the Cheyenne environment to make sure it worked. Hope that helps. |
Dockimbel 12-Feb-2010 [7904x2] | Jim: 'worker-libs have to be declared inside 'globals section of config file. |
I usually load mysql driver from a local Cheyenne libs/ sub-folder : globals [ ... worker-libs [ %libs/mysql-protocol.r ] ... ] | |
jrichards 12-Feb-2010 [7906] | Thanks Doc, I did get it running with some simple selects and updates now I just need to learn how to format the returned data. This is good stuff. By the way I am using the do-sql method and works great. |
james_nak 12-Feb-2010 [7907] | Doc, I wonder if that is my problem. I don't have worker-libs my httpd.cfg file. |
Dockimbel 13-Feb-2010 [7908] | James: it's not mandatory, you can load mysql driver from 'on-application-start event for example (but you'll need to do that for all your webapps). It's just simplier to declare it in config file once for all. |
james_nak 13-Feb-2010 [7909] | Got it. |
Carl 13-Feb-2010 [7910x2] | I want to move DevBase (R3 Chat) to Cheyenne, but I must admit that I am a newbie with Cheyenne. Currently the code runs as a process, and we tunnel packets thru HTTP via Apache. However, I could run it as a persistent process in Cheyenne, or via some method that would simply put the http input and output into a socket. Anyone here know how this is done? |
(BTW, I'm doing this to move DevBase to the new Linnode server... to offload it to a faster location.) | |
Graham 13-Feb-2010 [7912] | Is this why chat is down now? |
Carl 13-Feb-2010 [7913] | I've not shut it down yet. But, I've been having difficulty connecting to that server all day. It's probably under 10 feet of snow. |
Graham 13-Feb-2010 [7914x2] | If it's running as a single process .. that won't scale very well will it? |
Wonder how much slower it would be if you ran it as rsp scripts | |
Carl 13-Feb-2010 [7916] | It scales very well... as long as it has a web server sitting in front of it. |
Henrik 13-Feb-2010 [7917] | as a cheyenne app it probably would run faster |
Carl 13-Feb-2010 [7918] | The web server does the serializing and I/O buffering. |
Graham 13-Feb-2010 [7919] | If you ran it as rsp, it wouldn't be serialized |
Carl 13-Feb-2010 [7920] | Basically, it does not matter where the proc lives, as long as I can "redirect" I/O to it from the web server, which does all the TCP buffering. |
Graham 13-Feb-2010 [7921] | where's the server code ? |
older newer | first last |