World: r3wp

need some anti-spam techniques then

I tell you all the time, just insert the form using javascript. I 
do it this way and I had no problems with a spam yet.

Why don't you build it using Atom.. very straight forward, I have 
a few modules i could port.. and would make a good tutorial for everyone.

Motivated to add counter-measures.  Activated the PoL (Proof of Life) 
code.  I'll watch the logs for a while but I think the rbbs.r on 
peoplecards should now be closer to immune from the robot spammer 
that tagged me a few months back.


Terry; Might be a good idea.  Promoting Cheyenne, promoting Semantic 
Database and building something rebols can use for a forum all at 
the same time.  Many birds, few stones.

Cheyenne has captcha built in, and that's what I use

Where's our man Doc these days?

working hard on projects?

One thing is clear - with R3 we have to get new blood, or we'll die. 
Successfull rebollers are moved to other projects, and they nearly 
disappear from community life ...

not sure of that, i think  rebolers are waiting for R3 and stopped 
all R2 projects

that's why it's so urgent to pop up a release (even an alpha one)

Everyone has already given his opinion but I repeat anyway. 
It is damaging not to open the aplha. 
Rebolers are sick of waiting.

Not the group for this, but the R3 license will decide if it flies 
or not.

i don't think there are many people who stopped r2 projects... and 
surely not nenad.

Hi guys, my current mission is ending, so I'll be back fulltime on 
Cheyenne in a couple of days. I have a v0.9.17 close to release.

Seen any problems with odbc and encapped Cheyenne??

I get all sorts of cursor problems

Developers stopping their work on R2 waiting for R3 are just loosing 
time. I bet that R2 will still be the stable REBOL in 6 months (maybe 
even more). For professional work, stick to R2, until R3 reaches 
a stable level.

wrong group

is the new version contain any bug fixes or is it justs control panel 
enhancements?

Hi Graham, never tested Cheyenne with ODBC. Do you see differences 
between encapped version and source version running on rebcmd.exe 
?

Yes.

Bugfixes and new features. Control panel is not ready for prime time.

I encapped Cheyenne to run my patient portal and the data returned 
from a sql query is all corrupted

did you try to : probe copy db ? (and see the raw result returned 
by the db port)

I am wondering if anyone can reproduce this .. or whether it's just 
me!

No.  I wasn't sure where to begin to debug this.

and I had a deadline to meet .. so I just used the source code version

are you using the 'do-sql command ?

yes

are you on XP or Vista ?

2003

Haven't tested under XP or Vista yet.

'do-sql is using a trick to determine if the scheme is using a native 
driver (RT's) or a user-defined one. It's testing db-port/handler 
: none means native driver, other value means user-defined. This 
was working ok with the native MySQL driver, could you tell me if 
this test is also ok for a odbc:// driver ? (just open an odbc connection 
in console mode and tell me the value of db-port/handler)

Hey Doc, welcome back.

Hi Terry, back for 5 min only, I was on the road to bed ;-)

Can I just drop the embed module into the latest Cheynne to make 
it work?

Yes, it should work (IIRC, you have to comment all other modules, 
see the doc in the embed-demo.r sample).

mod-embed.r

Ok.. cool.

It's working great by the way.

If you have 3 minutes left, can you explain the shared space between 
cheyenne and uniserve please.

Which one ? uniserve/shared ?

Uniserve is just the underlying network layer for Cheyenne.

You once mentioned the need to use the 'shared' something or other 
for communication between uniserve modules and cheyenne.

It also provides the IPC support.

International Political Corruption?

If only...I would be a rich man ;-). Inter Process Communication

:)

Actually, i have a response from a web page pushing data to a uniserve 
service.. so kinda close.. just wondering if there's a preferred 
method.

One last thing.. how do you feel about incorporating cheyenne into 
a GPL product?