World: r3wp
[Plugin-2] Browser Plugins
older newer | first last |
Cyphre 10-May-2006 [660] | Josh: so you basically need to replace WndProc handler with a plugin specific one right? |
JoshM 10-May-2006 [661x2] | Well....the problem is that the plugin has to handle its own window events because of the COM architecture. And REBOL has to handle its own events for other reasons. Soo.....maybe instead of an invisible proxy window, we can make REBOL's window a real window that sits on top of the plugin window, then it would get its events directly. |
That's what I'm thinking, anyway. This is still all prototype-stage. | |
Cyphre 10-May-2006 [663] | Yep, understood. That's probably why the current plugin also cannot detect 'activate and 'deactivate events when you are focusing/unfousing the browser window. Do you think this could be also improved? It is useful for application to know when user switched to other window than the one with running plugin so it could manage the /View GUI appropriately (focusing/unfocusing fields, areas etc.) |
JoshM 10-May-2006 [664] | Yes...now the question is, does deactivate mean switching outside of the browser? or does deactivate meaning switching outside the plugin, i.e. to a HTML text box on the page? |
Cyphre 10-May-2006 [665] | I think 'deactivate should mean that the plugin window is loosing the 'event focus' ie no mouse/keyboard events are detected. So I think it should yield the event in both cases. |
JoshM 10-May-2006 [666x2] | agreed. |
I'm surprised you're not getting this event already, because the plugin is passing WM_KILLFOCUS/WM_SETFOCUS to REBOL. i'll have to investigate that. | |
Cyphre 10-May-2006 [668] | In some browser you can focus/unfocus the plugin object using JS too so this should be also catched.(I hope this is the same event as when you click outside the plugin win) |
JoshM 10-May-2006 [669] | we'll want to make that a test case when we implement this. |
Cyphre 10-May-2006 [670] | I haven't checked it in the lates plugin version, but it didn't work in the odler one...I'll make simple test script so you can play with it. |
JoshM 10-May-2006 [671x9] | thanks |
Announcement: REBOL Technologies is pleased to release the beta-6 version of REBOL/Plugin for Internet Explorer, which is based on REBOL/View 1.3.2! | |
For information about the plugin, and to install or upgrade to the 1.3.2 plugin, please go to the following URL: http://www.rebol.com/web-plugin.html | |
This release is only an update to 1.3.2 -- no new features have been added. | |
Also, we have included information about the alpha version of REBOL/Plugin for Mozilla-based browsers. As we have mentioned before, this is a very early-stage release that contains numerous problems. Please do not use it on production machines. | |
We would love your feedback on both the IE and Mozilla releases. Please post specific feature requests and bugs in the corresponding checklists here on the Plugin world. And feel free to discuss everything here :) | |
Sorry, I should clarify: Please post in the "Plugin" checks here in the REBOL3 world. | |
It's been a long day. :) | |
Make that "checklists" Ahh. I need to get off the computer. | |
Volker 10-May-2006 [680x3] | networking: i would onlyuse browser forthe same things. if i do a "read http://*"in rebol, that is connect/read/disconnect too? If something need performance i would use own implementations. Although, IIRC when i check cgi-headers, i see usually "keep-alive" from the browser. But no expert there. |
proxy-parsing: IIRC when i once looked, proxy-settings can be javascript which returns the right proxy. | |
ANd when i am awake again, i check out these plugins .) | |
Henrik 10-May-2006 [683] | cyphre, I already wrote my own event filtering, but had a bit of hope that it would be possible to do internally for R3. I just personally think it's a bit too high level a place to solve the problem. |
ScottT 11-May-2006 [684] | wrt own window on top to do the window messages, etc -- I'm all for slamming itself on top of the browser, and not going through it to embed view. or make it a "windowed" control, which is how IE does SELECT elements. The complexity there is having it crop to be part of the page. I think wndows media control is like that, where you can pick a windowed version, which performs better (probably from similar things that you are running into. MSAgent runs in the browser, and is allowed ro roam anywhere on the screen in an irregularly shaped winoow. It also starts a server process which handles all calls to the interactions with applications like IE and Office that take advantage of that aspect. It's all asynchronous/multithreaded, and shuts down automatically when there are no more client controls to serve. The DOM provides screen position information, but the downside is that with embedded controls like Adobe SVG viewer and Flash is that they will respond correctly to transparency (showing html page background through transparent parts of control -- never got REBOL plugin to do that, which has something to do with wmode="transparent" or something similar |
Pekr 11-May-2006 [685x5] | Anamonitor demo shows some strange white border at the bottom ... |
and under my WindowsXP, the plug-in is obtrusive - while it is installed,I get IE message each time, asking me if I want to allow activeX control - it happens on main plug-in demo page | |
imo we should pretty soon decide on the issue of embedding method. I don't agree with putting window on top, if it will not allow for plugin to be part of tabbing mechanism in browser, simply focusable/unfocusable. It would be also nice to get multiple instances per session even for 1.3.2 - are you sure it is threading related problem? | |
And definitely - interactin part - we need that config access plus progress bar - without progress bar, it has strange feeling, as you can't know, if something is happening or not, which leads you to reloading the page ... | |
RIM does not run here ... in fact, imo if something breaks, then no other demo does run ... reload of page does not help - we have got some strange problem here ... anyone else observing it? | |
ScottT 11-May-2006 [690] | same here with excess security dialogs. windows 2000 |
Pekr 11-May-2006 [691x3] | short report - proxy still not working under IE ..... |
couldn't I send some args, where would I put set-net? :-) | |
guys, maybe you coudl fix older demos for new plug-in? There is link at the bottom of the page to user demos - bounce demo (Cyphre), and Color Lab (Oldes) do not work anymore ... and then there seems to be some spame garbage(?), which should be probably removed, if not functioning - it will not shed good light on us ... | |
PhilB 11-May-2006 [694x2] | Anyone had any joy with installing the Plugin with Firefox ?? ..... not sure what I am doing wrong here. |
Extracting the download into the plugins folder creates a sub-folder called rebol-moza1 containing the files. Tried copying the files out of there back inot the plugins folder and closing & opening firefox, but still no joy :-( | |
Pekr 11-May-2006 [696x4] | no, no subfolder! |
those files need to be placed in \plugins directory directly ... | |
to know if plug-in works, the version should appear in the plug-in app container .... if you are not behind the proxy, script will download and app launched .... | |
mozilla suite here has one problem though - I can run only script once - no reload ... to start another script, I have to reopen the browser .... | |
Henrik 11-May-2006 [700] | pekr, maybe it's related to how there can be only one instance of the plugin running at a time. maybe when reloading, the first instance is never shut down |
PhilB 11-May-2006 [701] | Even after moving the files, deleting the folder and re-startig firefox I get the text "Click here to downlaod plugin" text in the container. |
Henrik 11-May-2006 [702] | philb: what do you see when going to about:plugins in the browser? |
PhilB 11-May-2006 [703] | A whole load of plugins but nothing for Rebol |
Henrik 11-May-2006 [704] | and you are sure that you haven't got multiple installations of Mozilla and accidentally plopped it into the wrong one? |
PhilB 11-May-2006 [705] | Pretty sure .... though I did recently re-install firefox (along with the rest of Windoze) but installed it into the same folder as my previous version. |
JoshM 11-May-2006 [706] | ScottT that's really interesting.... |
Anton 11-May-2006 [707] | Mozilla Firefox plugin seems to be working ok for me. |
JoshM 11-May-2006 [708x2] | ScottT: Hmmmmm.............. |
...a thousand thoughts rolling around at once.... | |
older newer | first last |