World: r3wp
[Plugin-2] Browser Plugins
older newer | first last |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [62] | oh cool, can you send me the URL? i'd love to check it out |
Carl 3-May-2006 [63] | Working on that. |
Graham 3-May-2006 [64x3] | though I note I had to run a dummy window first otherwise the client run inside the browser window instead of as a separate window |
http://www.compkarori.com/reb/ | |
If the chat client wipes your hard drive, consider it a security exploit! | |
Carl 3-May-2006 [67] | Problem: the security certificate for IE has expired (about 2 months ago). We will need to renew it. |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [68] | until then, we can't post the 1.3.2 version. |
Carl 3-May-2006 [69] | Anyone have a good low-cost source of certificates? |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [70] | code signing certificates |
Graham 3-May-2006 [71] | if you post it, it won't install under IE now? |
Carl 3-May-2006 [72] | Otherwise, we'll go back to Thawte. |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [73] | no, it won't install without a valid certificate. |
Carl 3-May-2006 [74x3] | (The vender certification process can take a lot of time... they have to verify that we are "good guys".) |
So, we're probably locked into Thawte. | |
Otherwise it can take a week. | |
Graham 3-May-2006 [77] | has it been tested under IE7 as well? |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [78x2] | No, I don't have it installed...if someone does, please tell me how it goes. |
graham, how do i register for an account with your chat program? | |
Graham 3-May-2006 [80x2] | at the login page, there's a register button. |
I guess Eliza wasn't too helpful? | |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [82x4] | no ha ha that was funny |
We're trying to get the mozilla stuff posted. That's not packaged for installation yet (that's 5% of the missing 10%). | |
But you can copy the files to FireFox\plugins, so it's not that hard. | |
OK, so I want to get a discussion started. What do you guys want to see in the next version of the plugin? | |
Henrik 3-May-2006 [86] | well, I'm not sure what the level of ambition is for the next version? |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [87] | 1.3.2 is going out as-is, just an upgrade to the latest rebol viewdll. |
Henrik 3-May-2006 [88] | but at some point it'll be essential to run encapsulated scripts and use secure connections |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [89] | 1.3.3 is a feature upgrade, so i'm open to ideas...as long as it doesn't rely on something in rebol 3, we can look at it. |
Henrik 3-May-2006 [90] | is it in any way tied in with the SDK? is it possible to do /pro or /command stuff? |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [91] | Not sure on that, I need to check with Carl....I think I understand your overall question though, can we make a version of the plugin that supports pro/command right? |
Henrik 3-May-2006 [92] | I need the plugin for an application that could potentially be used for a few thousand users in an open enterprise environment, but signed scripts and security are essential there. |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [93x3] | got it. we'd have to look at some sort of licensing. |
maybe have rebol in the plugin download a license from a web server or something like that. | |
we'd have to figure out a way to prevent others from using your license. | |
Graham 3-May-2006 [96x3] | A way to protect plugin source code |
A way to add higher order encryption | |
is a must... | |
Henrik 3-May-2006 [99] | in short, we have to make sure that the right users are running the script and only those users have access to data (customers, accounting, etc.) |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [100] | encrypting the source? |
Graham 3-May-2006 [101] | I want my medical client to run in the browser as well. |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [102] | Encrypting the source code? encrypting network traffic? both? |
Graham 3-May-2006 [103x3] | so need ssl if possible. |
both. | |
if my plugin needs to pull my gmail email .. I need ssl. | |
JoshM 3-May-2006 [106] | got it. |
Carl 3-May-2006 [107x2] | SSL is not necessary if you're using REBOL on both sides. |
But, if you need to access non-REBOL, I can see the need. | |
Graham 3-May-2006 [109] | the x-internet is encrypted now. |
Henrik 3-May-2006 [110] | I had this (wild?) idea that the plugin would be able to run normal rebol scripts, but with signed scripts encapped with the SDK would turn the same plugin into /Pro or /Command. I'm just brainstorming, but that would be a nice way to keep everything within one plugin. I don't know... |
Carl 3-May-2006 [111] | That's what we called /Platform. |
older newer | first last |