World: r3wp
[Plugin-2] Browser Plugins
older newer | first last |
Anton 4-May-2006 [405] | It's a simple "proto-form", good for development while we think and argue about a good update mechanism. |
JoshM 4-May-2006 [406] | Hmm OK interesting. I like the argument though. Good exercise for the brain. :) |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [407] | Java has something like the Needs header in specified in applet params. REBOL has the Needs header. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [408x2] | Website out on the web should have *no* control over decision making - only suggestions. Website on a corporate trusted LAN should have heaps of control. |
What are we developing for first ? I think it is the "wild web" first, isn't it ? | |
JoshM 4-May-2006 [410] | Interesting. OK, so we're leaning towards parallel side-by-side installs with automatic overwrite updates for security fixes? |
Anton 4-May-2006 [411] | (We should clarify this.) |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [412] | Sounds good to me. |
JoshM 4-May-2006 [413x2] | Yes, we're developing for the wild wild web. |
:) | |
Anton 4-May-2006 [415x2] | I'll compromise if you guys are set on this (slightly comlex) scheme. |
(slightly complex) | |
Graham 4-May-2006 [417x2] | I'd prefer ease of use over anything else. |
I dislike being asked by my kids to install stuff for them all the time ... | |
Anton 4-May-2006 [419] | (I just know the version checking is going to cause subtle problems. There's nothing simpler than a old-version < new-version test) |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [420] | I also like being able to specify the REBOL generation in the Needs header of the script. It is more reliable than requiring it in applet params, and more compatible with View. Still, aplet params may be prefered if you don't want the launcher to have to read REBOL headers. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [421] | Understood Graham, but we're not there yet. |
Graham 4-May-2006 [422] | And my kids are more savvy than Grandpa Sally |
JoshM 4-May-2006 [423] | I want to sleep on this. Good ideas. We still need to think of a good UI....I originally thought a popup "An update is available for REBOL/Plugin for Internet Explorer. Would you like to update now"? |
Anton 4-May-2006 [424] | They should be able to figure out a right-click menu. |
JoshM 4-May-2006 [425] | I think right-click is too hidden. Plus, applications need right-click support anyway right? |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [426] | I kinda like allowing apps to have their own right-click menus. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [427] | Popups suck. Could put it in the plugin space. |
Graham 4-May-2006 [428] | avoid double/right clicks |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [429] | Ouch. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [430] | Right about right-click.... Just thought of it thinking of Flash plugin. |
JoshM 4-May-2006 [431x2] | What about a little bubble down by the clock? Of course that would only work on Windows, maybe 2000 or later. |
And we have to be cross-platform back to 98 | |
Anton 4-May-2006 [433] | no, must be in browser. |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [434] | I think a prompt is better, particulary for security updates. |
JoshM 4-May-2006 [435] | Flash uses right-click? |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [436] | Does Flash use right-click on Mac? |
JoshM 4-May-2006 [437x2] | Maybe status bar in browser? too hidden probable. |
Ha that's funny. | |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [439] | Security updates are too important not to prompt for. |
Graham 4-May-2006 [440] | There is no right click on Mac. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [441] | Prompts I think should go in the plugin's space in the browser. We can implement them as rebol faces. |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [442] | Ctrl-click then. Same difference, just less useful. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [443] | what's the name for that space, by the way ? is it "frame" ? |
Graham 4-May-2006 [444] | perhaps there should be a standard whereby the plugin application displays the notice. |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [445] | Anton, that won't work for webbugs. We want the security updates to be visible even when the applet isn't. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [446] | Hmmmm......... |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [447] | Especially when the applet isn't, since those kind of applets are more likely to be exploiting security bugs. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [448x2] | Are there legitimate uses for webbugs ? |
Could we enforce a minimum window size ? Think of the minimum window size we have here on WinXP. Never bothered me before. | |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [450] | Rarely. They're quite common for user tracking, AJAX receivers and exploit code. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [451] | Do you think a minimum window size would be good ? |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [452] | Running a REBOL/Services client in a webbug and having it control the browser through the DOM could be useful though. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [453] | Why would it be worried about showing a small window, though ? |
BrianH 4-May-2006 [454] | What's a minimum though, when you could just as easily color the applet the same color as the background? |
older newer | first last |