World: r3wp
[Plugin-2] Browser Plugins
older newer | first last |
Cyphre 29-Jun-2006 [1490x5] | I just tried to install the latest plugin for FireFox. I manually removed all previous version files but the automatic installation didn't work. I managed to get it working after I downloaded the whole instalation page locally and run it from my harddisk...very strange. Does anyone have simmilar problems? (I'm running Firefox 1.5.0.4 on WinXP SP1) |
Ah, found the problem. | |
The instalation popup window is not opening when you have set options->content->always warn when trying install new plugin (this is rough translation as I'm using Czech FireFox) and you don't have added www.rebol.com in 'trusted servers' in this option dialog. | |
Maybe this could be noted on the instalation page? | |
BTW it is interesting that Flash doesn't need such settings as I was able to install Flash plugin without having the flash server in the 'allowed servers'. Maybe they are using different instalation technique? | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1495] | I think it is in the instructions. I remember doing this. |
Cyphre 29-Jun-2006 [1496] | Ah yes! You are right :) Sorry, have to read it better next time :) |
Rebolek 29-Jun-2006 [1497] | but you're still right that flash does not require this. |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1498] | Perhaps they have some special dispensation? |
Cyphre 29-Jun-2006 [1499x2] | Maybe it is because it is 'official plugin' registered on firefox site? |
I think Rebol should 'officially register' once it gets to release state. | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1501] | well... that won't be a while on account of the delay |
Rebolek 29-Jun-2006 [1502] | hm :/ |
JoshM 29-Jun-2006 [1503] | Yes, good idea. We are going to look at officially registering with Mozilla.org, that will eliminate the need to modify Exceptions list in FireFox. |
Volker 29-Jun-2006 [1504] | for security: Until the plugin is fixed, could it show an own page first where it ask "do you really want to run this script?". then it would be still easy to show a demo to friends, but not for others to sneak scripts in. |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1505x4] | Regarding comment above on "... jumping around from plan to plan....": |
Sorry, but we are not. Our plan has not changed in a long time. But, what you see are pieces of the plan in development in parallel. To explain... | |
REBOL 3.0 architecture consists of 3 tiers: environments, cores, plugins. | |
Environments are modules such as: console, browser, encap... but in R3.0 also things like Apache mod, IDE, enbedded, raw I/O, and others. | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1509] | What can we say? It's the perception amongst developers. |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1510] | Yes, and I understand how you can draw that conclusion. |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1511x2] | How close is R3 anyway? Is it that close to replacing R2? |
A number of us have projects based upon statements made about the plugin. | |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1513x2] | No, it is not that close to R2 for several reasons.... which is also why I look for parallel projects related to it. |
In cases where development efforts for R2 also benefit R3, then we can do them now. That is the case of the Browser. | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1515] | So, doesn't it make sense then to finish the plugin as it is so close? |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1516x5] | Yes, it does makes sense to do so. |
The first step in the plugin was to simply get it running again. | |
The next step was to get it to update properly, and while at it (and waiting on me) Josh did an amazing thing by making it deal with multiple instances. | |
So, what is important now is to build a list of shortcomings (e.g. security comes to mind), and prioritize. | |
We also value any inputs and contributions that can be provided by developers. | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1521x2] | So, how much effort would it be to complete the plugin? A day, week, month? |
The current status is that all the demos on rebol.net don't work ... this is not a good advert. | |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1523x3] | We need a short list of "items" that define "complete". Once we have that, we can work toward making that happen. |
Certainly, I would like to see a non-beta of the R2. | |
in the plugin. | |
Graham 29-Jun-2006 [1526x2] | So, a short list of the outstanding critical problems .. see if they're fixable in your time frame , if so - commit to a final release? |
That would be good. | |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1528x4] | It would be helpful if you (primary developers) could help us with that list. So we are in agreement on "complete". |
In addition, things like the demos can be handled quickly by developers, as well as moving some of the contest demos into the browser. | |
It is also likely, and I should be clear, that some behaviors related to the browser handling of things like events may be somewhat different than in REBOL itself. This is related to the fact that explorer is handling the events and sending them to us via a type of "relay" (we call it a window proxy). | |
We should try to minimize such differences.... but there are some that we may not be able to remove entirely. | |
Volker 29-Jun-2006 [1532x2] | complete is when it cant be exploited without some basic agreement IMHO. Which for me is some kind of "run this script really" before loading the real thing. In a way that stop normal people from using it, except they get personal motivation by trusted persons. |
(since that can be done in a day ;) | |
Carl 29-Jun-2006 [1534x2] | Hi Volker... can you clarify that a bit (e.g. in what context)? |
e.g do you mean run the script before installing or before running a demo, or ? | |
Volker 29-Jun-2006 [1536x2] | To make the current plugin ready for demos. |
if i point people to http://polly.rebol.it/test/test/game/use/game/game-plugin.html currently, they allow everyone to send every script, by installing it. | |
Terry 29-Jun-2006 [1538] | Critical problem.. no Mac support. |
Volker 29-Jun-2006 [1539] | if the pluin shows a big url and a warning: this script could be used to install malware, do youreally want.." and i tell them "thats my url" it would work |
older newer | first last |