r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Plugin-2] Browser Plugins

Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1460]
I talk about docs, because, at least I document my products...
JoshM
27-Jun-2006
[1461]
I appreciate your comments....first off, I will forward them to Carl.
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1462]
joshM, it's not your fault. you are doing a heck of a job.
JoshM
27-Jun-2006
[1463x3]
Regarding the temporary hold on plugin development  -- you'll have 
to talk to him. But, I can tell you, that we want to make both the 
plugin and REBOL 3 as great as possible. In this case, there are 
some crucial things in REBOL 3 that we need to improve and those 
take priority.
But, regarding your needs for the plugin now.....I'm sure we can 
get some of these crucial bugs fixed.
The Win2k issue is serious...I didn't realize it was completely broken. 
We'll take a look at that. The only thing is that Carl is in France 
and I can't release w/o him, so it will probably have to wait untill 
he gets back in 3 weeks.
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1466]
that's ok for me. I don't need it tomorrow, but it would be nice 
to develop my concepts for demoing in a few months time.
JoshM
27-Jun-2006
[1467]
In the meantime, if you have any other crucial breaking bugs, please 
post them. (also, regarding stability: please try the plugin on a 
fresh, clean system first, because old plugin versions can sometimes 
mess things up).
JaimeVargas
27-Jun-2006
[1468x2]
Graham: "How can anyone plan anything ??"

Henrik: "I had something in mind... I've been waiting for almost 
two years to implement ..."
Pekr: "that is kind of general communication problem..."

JoshM: "Regarding the temporary hold on plugin development  -- you'll 
have to talk to him"


Those are  reasons  why I move towards Orca, and I now moving towards 
other languages, until Orca is mature, you can't bet your future 
on Rebol, because over and over again things stay the same with little 
glimpses of hope that comes from small announcements, but not real 
change.
How amazing it is that Rebol has lost ground an oportunities, and 
every other language is developing and making progress at an incredible 
pace.
Henrik
27-Jun-2006
[1470x2]
jaimevargas, well I sure hope that Orca will deliver
because it _will_ _most_ _certainly_ deliver, won't it? :-)
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1472]
I am not sure Orca will deliver, as Rebol lost momentum already, 
and unless Orca attracts new developers (which is imo unlikely), 
it is a tough problem. I wonder Kaj bets on Orca for Syllable.
JaimeVargas
27-Jun-2006
[1473]
Until there is a change in RT in rebol polices rebol is going to 
lose market and mind share, and it risk being completely isolated, 
like it happen to Apple before to OSX, or scheme before PLT, or Smalltalk 
before seaside, or Ruby before rails. We need a push for real.
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1474x2]
Yeah, you know the cure - open source. The rest hoped for RT's plan 
to keep the kernel, but release the rest. I wonder, why plug-in, 
which is completly unrelated to Rebol itself, was not released as 
open sourced ...
Jaime - so what is your environment of choice for the future being? 
Is that a Python?
JaimeVargas
27-Jun-2006
[1476]
Yes not many people willing to contribute to Orca, the sad thing 
is that I know of at least 3 more complete clones that have not been 
delivered due authors wish. So Rebol is quite fragmented. And all 
the hopeshare goes to RT. I wish people could gather around just 
one code base, and work like many other comunities, but there is 
something here holding people back.
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1477]
author wish = Carl?
JaimeVargas
27-Jun-2006
[1478x2]
Nope different authors.
Karl Robillard is the only one that has come out with an actual viable 
clone, and the only one that keeps coding in the open and sharing.
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1480x2]
ah, I don't understand them then. Why so? Maybe because they don't 
want hurt RT? The question is, what is hurting the situation more 
:-)
If RT would deliver on their plans, that there would be no objections, 
but :-) Did not know there are other full clones. I knew of one, 
but not three of them :-)
JaimeVargas
27-Jun-2006
[1482]
Pekr, my development  choices are:
Cross Platform Stand Alone Apps -> PLT-Scheme
Web Apps -> Ruby-on-Rails
OSX only Apps -> Cocoa or F-Script.
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1483x3]
anyway - why not to open plug-in itself? Wasn't it said, that RT 
will keep the kernel, and the rest, including the concole, most parts 
of View, will be open-sourced?
PLT - never heard of that ...
Could not Ruby be used for stand alone apps too?
JaimeVargas
27-Jun-2006
[1486]
Who knows, just like we don't understand any of the decisions or 
unkept promises. (We waited how long for OSX-SDK? How long for async, 
etc. So many promises, so little delivered).
Pekr
27-Jun-2006
[1487]
I wonder why Python is missing - cross platform, really cross platform, 
including small devices, .Net, very large community, lots of tools 
around, etc.
JaimeVargas
27-Jun-2006
[1488x2]
Pekr, Ruby and stand alone yes. But packaging is not as easy as PLT-Scheme, 
which just gives you a single binary like rebol.
(That ends my ranting, Orca still has a chance if anyone time please 
feel welcome to contribute, I sign-off from this channel now)
Cyphre
29-Jun-2006
[1490x5]
I just tried to install the latest plugin for FireFox. I manually 
removed all previous version files but the automatic installation 
didn't work. I managed to get it working after I downloaded the whole 
instalation page locally and run it from my harddisk...very strange. 
Does anyone have simmilar problems? (I'm running Firefox 1.5.0.4 
on WinXP SP1)
Ah, found the problem.
The instalation popup window is not opening when you have set options->content->always 
warn when trying install new plugin (this is rough translation as 
I'm using Czech FireFox) and you don't have added www.rebol.com in 
'trusted servers' in this option dialog.
Maybe this could be noted on the instalation page?
BTW it is interesting that Flash doesn't need such settings as I 
was able to install Flash plugin without having the flash server 
in the 'allowed servers'. Maybe they are using different instalation 
technique?
Graham
29-Jun-2006
[1495]
I think it is in the instructions.  I remember doing this.
Cyphre
29-Jun-2006
[1496]
Ah yes! You are right :) Sorry, have to read it better next time 
:)
Rebolek
29-Jun-2006
[1497]
but you're still right that flash does not require this.
Graham
29-Jun-2006
[1498]
Perhaps they have some special dispensation?
Cyphre
29-Jun-2006
[1499x2]
Maybe it is because it is 'official plugin' registered on firefox 
site?
I think Rebol should 'officially register' once it gets to release 
state.
Graham
29-Jun-2006
[1501]
well... that won't be a while on account of the delay
Rebolek
29-Jun-2006
[1502]
hm :/
JoshM
29-Jun-2006
[1503]
Yes, good idea. We are going to look at officially registering with 
Mozilla.org, that will eliminate the need to modify Exceptions list 
in FireFox.
Volker
29-Jun-2006
[1504]
for security: Until the plugin is fixed, could it show an own page 
first where it ask "do you really want to run this script?". then 
it would be still easy to show a demo to friends, but not for others 
to sneak scripts in.
Carl
29-Jun-2006
[1505x4]
Regarding comment above on "... jumping around from plan to plan....":
Sorry, but we are not.  Our plan has not changed in a long time. 
 But, what you see are pieces of the plan in development in parallel. 
 To explain...
REBOL 3.0 architecture consists of 3 tiers: environments, cores, 
plugins.
Environments are modules such as: console, browser, encap... but 
in R3.0 also things like Apache mod, IDE, enbedded, raw I/O, and 
others.
Graham
29-Jun-2006
[1509]
What can we say?  It's the perception amongst developers.