World: r3wp
[Postscript] Emitting Postscript from REBOL
older newer | first last |
Gregg 6-Apr-2006 [90] | Yup. |
Henrik 6-Apr-2006 [91] | pekr, reading your comments seem to focus on a PS viewer. This is completely uninteresting to me. I want tools that are native to REBOL to allow me to print graphics directly to a printer with the fewest amount of 3rd party tools. How many shrinkwrapped apps out there need third party tools for something as basic as printing? |
Graham 6-Apr-2006 [92] | I've got a colour laser printer on my network which I think supports postscript. I presume to print a postscript file, I just send it to the ip address of the printer? |
Maxim 6-Apr-2006 [93] | hum good question. I'd like to know this as well... anyone? |
Graham 6-Apr-2006 [94x4] | I have a jetdirect usb print server at 192.168.1.253 >> port: open/direct tcp://192.168.1.253:9100 >> insert port read %boys-0-36-length-weight.ps >> close port |
and I printed out my postscript file with no problems. | |
jetdirect print servers use 9100 for data, and 80 for the embedded webserver. | |
That was pretty easy ... create the postscript file, and send it directly to the printer, or print server. | |
Henrik 6-Apr-2006 [98] | precisely |
Graham 6-Apr-2006 [99x3] | I wonder if we should use an existing dialect and modify it to product ps .. or create one from scratch. |
Should we use pair! or not ? | |
moveto 72x72, or moveto 72 72 postscript is RPN, so that looks like 72 72 moveto | |
Henrik 6-Apr-2006 [102] | what about starting from the DRAW dialect? |
Graham 6-Apr-2006 [103] | I guess if the main aim is to take drawings to postscript, then that makes sense. |
Henrik 6-Apr-2006 [104] | the fastest route definitely. a PS -> DRAW thing would be a nice thing to have but DRAW -> PS is the most important right now |
Graham 6-Apr-2006 [105x2] | So, for example, if we used to plot dialect to draw a graph, we can then emit postscript and send directly to the printer. |
used the Plot dialect .. | |
Henrik 6-Apr-2006 [107] | yes, I think it should work like the DRAW function, but instead of producing an image it produces a string! value to be used however you want it |
Graham 6-Apr-2006 [108x3] | String! is good. |
Or, perhap a block! for further processing? | |
Say you wanted to insert an eps file into your output. | |
Henrik 6-Apr-2006 [111] | not sure about the mechanism yet, but maybe yes |
Graham 6-Apr-2006 [112] | An eps file is just a postscript file which is written in a special way ... |
Henrik 6-Apr-2006 [113] | there is no paper information AFAIK |
Graham 6-Apr-2006 [114x2] | In the name of science, I repeated the above test and it printed out again. |
I also tried it with a pdf, as the printer supports direct pdf printing, but nothing happened. | |
Henrik 6-Apr-2006 [116] | interesting. tried different pdfs? |
Graham 6-Apr-2006 [117] | Not yet. |
Geomol 7-Apr-2006 [118x4] | DRAW -> PS is one possibility. Should we on a longer term also have a dialect or set of functions, than can produce PS? |
that | |
DRAW is also a function used like: img: make image! 100x100 DRAW img <some draw commands> With PostScript, I'm thinking something like: ps-output: "" POSTSCRIPT ps-output <some PS commands> ps-output could then also be a file! or port! and send the output directly to the destination. | |
<some PS commands> in the above is a block of commands with arguments. | |
Graham 7-Apr-2006 [122] | Is the aim to take a draw block and process it so that postscript is produced. |
Geomol 7-Apr-2006 [123x2] | That's what I understood from Henrik's posts. |
It's one way of doing it, and maybe not so bad. I don't know enough about PS to see, if DRAW is too limited. Maybe PS has a lot other stuff, you wanna do, that is difficult to do in DRAW. | |
Graham 7-Apr-2006 [125x2] | as far as I recall, it has quite a limited command set. |
of course, you can define new functions within ps. | |
Geomol 7-Apr-2006 [127x2] | The DRAW approach is, that if you can produce your output in a DRAW block, then you can also print it using PS. My approach is to make a PS dialect, and keep DRAW out of is. With my approach, you can print from REBOL/Core too. I guess, we can have both approaches without problem. |
And both will be usefull for different situations. | |
Graham 7-Apr-2006 [129] | but using a draw dialect is possible in core .. u just can't render it. |
Geomol 7-Apr-2006 [130] | Oh, you're right. :-) |
Graham 7-Apr-2006 [131x2] | but let's start with a postscript dialect and then see if we can retrofit draw to it. |
that way we are not constrained by draw. | |
Geomol 7-Apr-2006 [133] | Then I just need a list of PS commands to get started on the dialect. |
Graham 7-Apr-2006 [134x3] | since rebol3 is coming, and View may well change, it makes less sense to stick to the past. |
this has a reference at the end : http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/programming/postscript/postscript.html | |
Is this works, you can then render your paint images to postscript printers :) | |
Geomol 7-Apr-2006 [137] | Is it the "Index of Operators" in the link, you gave? |
Graham 7-Apr-2006 [138] | yes. |
Geomol 7-Apr-2006 [139] | add, arc, ...translate |
older newer | first last |