World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Steeve 21-Jan-2009 [9922] | *if not |
BrianH 21-Jan-2009 [9923] | Cool, I'll update the ticket. |
Steeve 21-Jan-2009 [9924x2] | it's not a bug Brian, onl |
If the user doesn''t write REBOL in uppercase, he must be fired... ;-) | |
BrianH 21-Jan-2009 [9926] | We have a lot of hot programmers in the community... :) |
Steeve 21-Jan-2009 [9927x2] | (oh my god !!! i have not anymore cigarettes) |
brb | |
BrianH 21-Jan-2009 [9929] | The horror! |
Steeve 21-Jan-2009 [9930] | (ouf i'm saved, i have cigarettes and whisky) |
btiffin 21-Jan-2009 [9931] | f: func [n] [if n = 1 [print 1] else [print 0]] f 2 Re else; ** Script Error: else has no value vs ** Script Error: else is obsolete. Use the EITHER function Second one far better for new to REBOL people imho. The'll only do the second case twice in a career, the first may have them scratching head for 10 minutes and giving this new REBOL thing the boot. |
PeterWood 21-Jan-2009 [9932x2] | Lies, damned lies, and statistics : 525 tickets on CureCode Rebol3 41 dimissed 2 completed 482 outstanding |
Though 320 are marked as tested. | |
BrianH 21-Jan-2009 [9934] | The 2 completed are documentation requests. The reason the tested and dismissed ones are not marked completed is because I don't know the policy for making that distinction. |
Dockimbel 22-Jan-2009 [9935] | Tested=>Completed : I guess that once the fix (or new feature) is released to users, it should be marked as completed. |
PeterWood 22-Jan-2009 [9936x2] | It would be grest if you could get the tested requests marked as completed as the stats give such a bad false impression. |
Doc's definition sounds good with the proviso that the status can be reverted if the user finds the bug hasn't been fixed. | |
Dockimbel 22-Jan-2009 [9938] | Btw, ticket should be closed by the emitter once the fix is released. If the user don't do that after a given period (let say 1 or 2 weeks, one of CC's admin or developers can do that instead). |
Janko 22-Jan-2009 [9939x2] | BrianH : yes please remove "else" |
virtual block looks very cool ! how were you able to use the same words insert,copy,etc.. on new datatype (I suppose without changing the initial insert functions) .. can this be done in rebol, I thought it's not possible but being able to define something like generic words on custom datatypes would be very important function? hm.. while I am at it... I realized I have no idea about what datatypes in rebol are and if one can make it's own.. | |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9941] | Janko, because the supported functions like COPY works on ports, and virtual blocks is a port scheme, customizing how COPY works with that specific scheme. |
Janko 22-Jan-2009 [9942x3] | Ahaa.. I saw ports and schemes mentioned and that you can define your own, but still have no idea what they are, will need to read more about it.. |
rebol is both very small and very big at the same time | |
(in a good way) | |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9945] | so it's not a new datatype, but a new scheme for port!. |
Janko 22-Jan-2009 [9946] | yes, I realized .. that's why I said big.. usually there are functions and variables, here are so many things, dialects, schemes .. etc :) |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9947] | I think you can figure out how it works by reading Steeves code. It's quite simple. |
Janko 22-Jan-2009 [9948x2] | that link doesn't work for me , and I also don't have r3 to test it |
I saw some tutorial about creating new "protoco handler" .. or is that a third thing? | |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9950x3] | it should be the same thing |
if you read about ports in the wiki, they'll give a fair explanation of how they work. | |
it's the same reason you can use READ on files, HTTP, FTP, etc. | |
Janko 22-Jan-2009 [9953x2] | aha yes.. this is interesting concept .. I was alredy thinking about it when I was using pop:// protocol (carl probably realized that most "communication" can be abstracted in means on operating on serries).. |
then I suppose to create new scheme needs to just provide handlers for all those funcs, insert, copy, delete .. ? | |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jan-2009 [9955] | Henrik, to what level are you being involved in R3 development? |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9956] | I work on the GUI and point out bugs to Carl. |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jan-2009 [9957] | Do you guys get to get down to the C code at all or is that strictly controlled by Carl? |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9958] | C is only Carl and Cyphre. Everyone else only work with REBOL. But we are allowed to contribute C code if he wants something specific. |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jan-2009 [9959] | Oh what about Gabriele? I thought he had that type of access. |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9960] | Yes, but he is very busy with QTask for the moment. He has contributed HTTP, REBOL/Services and the first prototype of the VID3 GUI. |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jan-2009 [9961] | I see. |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9962] | Janko, yes, exactly. If you open a port, you get a port object with information about what the scheme does. When that port is passed to COPY, appropriate actions are taken to carry out the COPY function that resides inside the scheme. |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jan-2009 [9963] | All of you volunteers are do you guys get paid for your work? |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9964] | I volunteer. I don't know about others. |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jan-2009 [9965] | Is there a list of all those contributing to R3? |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9966] | Our official people list appears not to be up to date: http://rebol.net/wiki/People :-) |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jan-2009 [9967] | hehe - no doesn't appear so. |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9968] | well, there's me (GUI), BrianH (smart guy), Brian Tiffin (docs), Cyphre (graphics), Gabriele (network/GUI), Pekr (communications), Maarten (network), and about 10 others who've made contributions. Didn't really want to mention people in case I forget important ones. |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jan-2009 [9969x2] | I understand. But that is helpful, thanks. |
I think Steeve and Doc are involved in some manner as well. | |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [9971] | oh yes. see? I forgot some. :-) |
older newer | first last |