World: r3wp
[!REBOL3-OLD1]
older newer | first last |
Gabriele 21-Sep-2006 [1533x2] | unix is probably not that great on threads either, i think everyone is using their own variant. |
there is a crossplatform library iirc, i hope it works :) | |
BrianH 21-Sep-2006 [1535x3] | Threads are actually done very well on Windows. They also have a fast shared-memory thread-like thing called fibers. It was only recently that some of the Unixes were able to catch up (except Solaris, which may be better). |
Windows sucks at processes though. | |
(BTW, I meant that Solaris may have been better than Windows at threads already. Stupid English.) | |
PeterWood 21-Sep-2006 [1538x2] | Please refrain from calling we English stupid ;-) |
Just teasing | |
Gabriele 22-Sep-2006 [1540x2] | brian, my fear is having differences across platform. the complexity can go up very easily, especially when there are platforms that support threads badly. |
i hope that, as you say, most unixes have catched up at this point... | |
Pekr 22-Sep-2006 [1542x2] | then Carl should look for very small kernel to license, which solves that - e.g. QNX - it has 75KB kernel IIRC :-) |
I really wonder, what R3 will be about - tasks (threads), new event system ... when thinking in cross-platform terms ... | |
BrianH 22-Sep-2006 [1544] | Linux and all of the commercial Unixes are good at threads now. I'm not familiar with the BSDs. |
JaimeVargas 23-Sep-2006 [1545] | OpenBSD and FreeBSD have very good support for them. NetBSD is lagging behind. DragonFlyBSD has even better threading model. |
Volker 26-Sep-2006 [1546x2] | http://www.plausible.org/nasal/ http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?title=Nasal_scripting_language Nasal - small, os-threads, used in flightgear. |
Maybe the treading is usefull? | |
Ladislav 5-Oct-2006 [1548x2] | anybody able to find good names for zero-based index series functions like variants of PICK, POKE, etc...? |
(any other any zero-based indexing suggestions welcome) | |
Anton 5-Oct-2006 [1550] | peekus and pokus - more like ancient Latin language roots... |
Ladislav 5-Oct-2006 [1551] | pokus means "trial" in Czech |
Anton 5-Oct-2006 [1552x2] | zpeek, zpoke ? |
Didn't we have this kind of discussion with rebcode ? | |
Tomc 5-Oct-2006 [1554] | cee caw |
Anton 5-Oct-2006 [1555] | what's the logic behind that, Tom ? |
Tomc 5-Oct-2006 [1556] | four days of fever and chills that and c - zero based arrays |
Ladislav 5-Oct-2006 [1557] | (the latest names are PICKZ and POKEZ, but I am not sure they are acceptable) |
Anton 5-Oct-2006 [1558x2] | I'm not sure we can do better, Ladislav. |
Tom, hope you get better. | |
Ladislav 5-Oct-2006 [1560] | me too |
Anton 5-Oct-2006 [1561] | Three letters start to look a little bit cryptic. Reminds me of LISP's car, cdr, cadr etc. |
Tomc 5-Oct-2006 [1562] | get and put |
Anton 5-Oct-2006 [1563] | suck and blow |
Tomc 5-Oct-2006 [1564x3] | long thread on that subject on the ATM (amature telescope maker) list, to put fans in front of or behind the mirror |
slurp dump | |
get / set I think would be my choice it is already in common use for similar ops | |
Anton 5-Oct-2006 [1567] | I think Ladislav is suggesting that, in addition to the existing PICK and POKE, which are 1-based, we add two new words which use 0-based indexing. |
Tomc 5-Oct-2006 [1568] | yes get/set for a 0 based series seems reasonable at the moment |
Maxim 5-Oct-2006 [1569] | suck and blow .... LOL ! |
Volker 5-Oct-2006 [1570x2] | zick, zoke :) |
if you really use 0based, you know what you do, an can remember that. and it sounds dynamic :) | |
Henrik 5-Oct-2006 [1572] | will we need a 'zeroth too? |
Volker 5-Oct-2006 [1573] | can it be a long name? pick-before series 27 is what it does. |
Maxim 5-Oct-2006 [1574] | could we define hair as being before head ? ;-) |
Gregg 5-Oct-2006 [1575] | I would use z-pick/z-poke rather than pickz/pokez. It mentally expands to zero-pick rather than pick-zero, and reads as zee-pick rather than picks. |
Maxim 5-Oct-2006 [1576] | or rather pigs |
Rebolek 5-Oct-2006 [1577] | pick0 poke0 ? |
Tomc 5-Oct-2006 [1578] | pre-pick pre-poke |
Oldes 6-Oct-2006 [1579x2] | I like z-pick and z-poke |
but I'm fine with pickz and pokez as well - no problem to me | |
Izkata 7-Oct-2006 [1581] | cpick and cpoke ? (Inspired by C++'s cin and cout) |
Ladislav 7-Oct-2006 [1582] | sounds interesting |
older newer | first last |