World: r3wp
[#Boron] Open Source REBOL Clone
older newer | first last |
Henrik 12-Jul-2006 [199] | so it would be hard to lure him/her in here? :-) |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [200] | Very hard. |
Henrik 12-Jul-2006 [201] | interesting |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [202x3] | We have a plain IRC channel ready in freenode. Join the Orca channel. |
That is the simplest. I just need to get meme9 to provide logs for it. So people can get up to speed. | |
I rather spend time coding Orca than coding tools. IRC is fine for chatting. | |
Henrik 12-Jul-2006 [205] | are you Aquanaut? |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [206] | Yes. |
Henrik 12-Jul-2006 [207] | there is only one person there |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [208x2] | I'll check out the IRC. We can't expand with a four person limit. That's crazy. |
I think IRC is the way to go. | |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [210] | Yeah campfire cost money per users. I prefer no to have the expense. |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [211] | I would like to steer orca back towards full compatibility (or close) to rebol (core 2.6.x at least). Currently orca has diverged somewhat. (It does have a compatibility flag, but I don't know how far ranging it is.) Does anyone here have any objections to this course of action ? |
Henrik 12-Jul-2006 [212] | nope. Personally I'd prefer a straight Rebol clone probably with added bits. |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [213] | I will fix some of the bugs though. |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [214] | The closer we make it, the less documentation we have to write ! :) |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [215x2] | For example, the Ops in Orca have are more comprehensive and correct that the ones in R2. |
Indeed. | |
Henrik 12-Jul-2006 [217] | do we clone the stupid parts as well? :-) |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [218] | now now ;) |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [219] | Lets swicth the conversation to IRC. |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [220] | I'm looking for an IRC client now... what are you guys using ? |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [221] | I use Colloquy in OSX |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [222x3] | I'm going to try Bersirc. |
What's the freenode server address I need ? | |
Ok I'm in. | |
Pekr 12-Jul-2006 [225] | Anton -if you are on Windows, then mirc is probably the best one ... |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [226] | Too late, I'm using Bersirc, which is open source. |
Pekr 12-Jul-2006 [227] | ah, ok, I just wanted to suggest what is simply the best for all those years ... :-) |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [228] | I went to wikipedia and it has an IRC comparison chart :) |
BrianH 12-Jul-2006 [229] | Jamie, Henrik, if there are bad ops or stupid parts in R2, be sure to mention them to those creating R3. Either RT will fix the problems or explain why they aren't problems. In the long run, it would be a good thing if Orca and REBOL were to be more compatible. |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [230] | Yes, actually, I'm more in favour of staying close to rebol, even with its bugs and deficiencies, to maintain as much compatibility as possible. |
[unknown: 9] 12-Jul-2006 [231] | Agreed. |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [232x2] | I just don't see the use of being compatible. I actually see it like a wast of time. 100% compatibility means importing the gotchas, the bugs, and the problems in certain designs. Like the port system. |
Yet my goal is to abandon Rebol, not have a backup tool. If I build a tool I want to use it for my own benefit. Not become tied to following an external spec. | |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [234] | (at least we know those bugs.) |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [235x2] | My approach about cloning "Copy what you like" http://www.paulgraham.com/copy.html |
Again. I taking this as a hobby. I will still pitch in if others want to make Orca into a real clone. Any how I still learn something which is my goal. | |
[unknown: 9] 12-Jul-2006 [237] | Perhaps switches? |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [238x3] | Maybe. But thats a lot of work. When one could just doing something new and cool. |
It depends of what is the objective. If the objective is to support an older code base then compatibility is a must. | |
If the objective is move forward and have the tool you want then that is not so important. Because the fwd port will only need to be do once. | |
[unknown: 9] 12-Jul-2006 [241] | All good points, and I respected your points from the start. The other side is true as well, and not actually in conflict with your goals, just your time, which is what is most valuable. |
JaimeVargas 12-Jul-2006 [242x2] | Campfire chatroom closed to public access. Please use theOrca IRC channel on freenode instead. |
The Campfire room will remain open for private interactions with Karl Robillard if you need an account please requested here. | |
Graham 12-Jul-2006 [244] | Why don't you use synapse chat? You have the server and client ... |
Anton 13-Jul-2006 [245x3] | Can you build that for all platforms ? Is the source open ? |
Jaime, this is a deep difference and we need to settle it. I agree it's more exciting being able to experiment and choose new behaviours for a language, but I think it's more responsible to support the language that we have. We can't just keep jumping from language to language. The real hard work is to perfect an existing language. | |
Will you agree to a real clone ? Then we can move forward without forking. | |
Volker 13-Jul-2006 [248] | At least the same syntax. not intended breaks like using $ for hex because orca will not need money! anyway. |
older newer | first last |