World: r3wp
[RT Q&A] [RT Q&A] Questions and Answers to REBOL Technologies
older | first |
Gabriele 6-Feb-2006 [206] | Henrik, see http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?script=reboldiff.r |
Rebolek 6-Feb-2006 [207] | Is this going to be part of REBOL, as written in blog article? |
Gabriele 6-Feb-2006 [208] | probably. it was developed for that reason, though we haven't discussed it further. |
Gabriele 16-Feb-2006 [209] | just to keep you informed (this is not an official announcement, we will be releasing a roadmap soon), the development of REBOL 3.0 is starting. no eta or feature list available yet. |
Anton 16-Feb-2006 [210] | cool. |
Pekr 17-Feb-2006 [211] | very cool, thank you Gabriele ... that is exactly what was missing. IMO ppl can wait, even longer then roadmap check-point state, but there should really be some roadmap and some more-often releases of alpha stuff - at least I found it vital, as ppl were throwing in some ideas, bug fixes, etc. |
Kaj 2-Apr-2006 [212] | Why is the View 1.3.2 release for Linux not on the main RT View download page? On the test build page it has release status, and I'm getting people who are unable to find the Linux download |
Volker 2-Apr-2006 [213] | No draw with fonts makes it beta? No "every-linux"-version? Or overlooked. I opt to have it there too. |
Gabriele 2-Apr-2006 [214] | problem is that it does'n work out of the box in all distros (you may need symlinking/installing libs), and there's the freetype issue. |
Kaj 2-Apr-2006 [215] | That's not going to change |
Gabriele 2-Apr-2006 [216] | more feedback of the kind "works great on my distro" would probably make it go to the main download page |
Kaj 2-Apr-2006 [217x2] | OK, it's working on Ubuntu Hoary |
Working great are not words I would use for the Linux version in general | |
Brock 15-Jun-2006 [219x4] | Problems installing Rebol/View latest official release 1.3.2 onto Windows 2000 Professional with all the latest Service packs... Rebol was installed using the default parameters, with the exception of the path, it was changed to C:\Program Files instead of C:\Program Files\Rebol\View. It was noticed immediately that the Microsoft Quick Launch toolbar disappeared. After an uninstall we found that the entire IE\Quick Launch folder was erased, but don't know if this was done by the Install or Uninstall. Afterwards, we rebooted the PC and found that the desktop image (which was added through IE) was also gone. |
Anyone else experienced any problems with something like this? | |
RT may want to try and replicate this install/uninstall inorder to confirm whether there is a problem with the installer. | |
It's not going over very well with my five web-developer colleagues... they are saying he has been infected by the Rebolla virus and getting a very good chuckle out of it!!! | |
Gabriele 15-Jun-2006 [223x2] | wait, installing to c:\program files means that no rebol subdir is being created. |
actually i wouldn't be surprised if it had deleted your whole program files dir. | |
Brock 15-Jun-2006 [225x5] | Further investigation shows that the files that have gone missing from his system are all in the c:\Documents and Settings\<User Account>\Application Data\Microsoft\ Internet Explorer and MSN Messenger folders... the files impacted seem to be all of the customizations he has made to these two apps. |
It handled only the removal of the Rebol specific files from the Program Files folder as expected. | |
I think the uninstaller simply removes the registry settings for rebol as the rebol.exe was still in the program files folder after the uninstall. | |
Initial investigation shows that only the two directories above were affected as other folders in the same path have all of their subdirectories intact. | |
Posting 3 up starting "It handled..." should read "The uninstall seemed to handle..." | |
Gabriele 15-Jun-2006 [230] | i don't think rebol touches anything inside appdata\microsoft, probably something strange has happened. |
Brock 15-Jun-2006 [231] | Did any of Gregg's installer code get migrated into the new RT installer? |
Gabriele 15-Jun-2006 [232x2] | not that I know of. |
what was the data-path set to while installing? | |
Brock 15-Jun-2006 [234] | Another victim... <path as above>\UnleashIT, all profiles removed. |
Gabriele 15-Jun-2006 [235] | well, uninstall does no more than this: |
Brock 15-Jun-2006 [236] | it's mentioned in my first post... C:\Program Files instead of C:\Program Files\Rebol\View |
Gabriele 15-Jun-2006 [237x2] | do-uninstall: does [ attempt [delete data-path/bypass-install] if get-face ckd [ if confirm reform ["Please confirm that you want to delete all files in" to-local-file data-path][ attempt [delete-dir data-path] ] ] found? all [ attempt [unlink-rebol form system/product true] attempt [unassociate-file true] attempt [unregister "REBOL" form system/product true] ] ] |
not install dir, data dir | |
Brock 15-Jun-2006 [239] | when he went to change from C:\ to d:\ and hit the "Change" button on the installer, we didn't catch that it had removed the "Rebol\View" portion and defaulted to the drive he launched the installer from. |
Gabriele 15-Jun-2006 [240] | so note that 1) it does not delete anything without asking confirmation and 2) only deletes the data dir which should be appdata\view\ |
Pekr 15-Jun-2006 [241] | So Rebol removes everything in installed folder? |
Gabriele 15-Jun-2006 [242] | no, it doesn't; it removes everything in the data dir but only if you confirm the deletion. |
Brock 15-Jun-2006 [243x2] | no, it only seemed to delete registry settings and the appdata/view folder. Nothing from his program files folder was erased, which is a good thing for him. |
So one thing I would like to suggest is that the "Change" button in the installer defaults to the folder as indicated in the default path provided when you start the installer. I think this is the root of the problem as the text looked like it was fully provided but the path field was short and we didn't confirm the full path. In my opinion it should have included \Rebol\View, but believe it did not. | |
PeterWood 25-Jun-2006 [245x2] | Any news of RIF? |
Any news of BCD datatype? | |
Gabriele 25-Jun-2006 [247] | no news currently. |
Pekr 26-Jun-2006 [248x2] | Gabriele - but maybe it would be worth to publish some blog article, about the state of Rebol 3. I know that every single project is delayed, but it starts to look strange once again - alpha in may, beta in June. It is end of June, according to another blog Carl is supposed to spend several weeks in France at that time, and no mention of when aproximately alpha will be out? |
and other thing - blog very often raises some questions, dunno if those are mainly rhetorical questions or so, but decision for particular areas are never announced. | |
Pekr 28-Jun-2006 [250] | What happened to SDK 2.6.3? It was announced on March, 2 by Carl. We were supposed to submit latest bugs to fix. So I wonder, if there are no bugs since 2.6.2, that 2.6.3 was not released? :-) |
Volker 28-Jun-2006 [251] | Truned out all to be features. |
Pekr 28-Jun-2006 [252] | :-) |
Gabriele 28-Jun-2006 [253] | i guess it's just that Carl hasn't had the time. I did fix some mezz bugs for that release... |
Oldes 4-Jul-2006 [254] | Will be there any new Rebol/Base build? The last one is from year 2004:( |
Gabriele 5-Jul-2006 [255:last] | i think there's one in the latest sdk archive. |
older | first |