World: r3wp
[DevCon2005] DevCon 2005
older newer | first last |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1951] | I have asked Carl about the problem of effect and draw different engine. He answered that the effect engine will be replace by AGG at terms. No schedule. |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1952x2] | ok, that is good to know, thanks once again .... |
editable rich-text - how fast it was? Was it fast enough to have small, cute IDE for rebol? Simply text editor for color syntax? | |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1954] | We compared my rich text engine and his one. Cyphre richtext display instantly, but is a bit slow while scrolling but usable. It's because everything in the area is recompute. Mine take some time to display, but scrolling is just an offset of the pane to change. |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1955] | you use library for that too? |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1956x2] | It will be enough for making a new Words if you want ;) |
No, mine is 100% Rebol, but just display, no edit at all. | |
Terry 3-Oct-2005 [1958] | Maarten.. Google earth is AJAX I believe.. (or is it Google Maps?) |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1959] | not sure - the speed of rebol is sometimes really limiting, let's just admit it ... simply - try e.g. here to scroll with altme - really slow ... |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1960x2] | Google maps |
It's pretty the same with richtext. But it's a prototype in external .dll | |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1962] | Terry - we do understand your message, but imo rich-apps have their place :-) Browser UI's are terrible usability wise. But you may be right if you think that browsers become container (canvas :-) for various stuff. We should probably managed to get plug-in running anyway :-) |
Terry 3-Oct-2005 [1963x2] | OK, so Microsoft is embracing AJAX (XMLHTTP, recently pushed strongly by Google’s Google Suggest and Google Maps) and they’re putting their own abstraction layer – codename “Atlas” – on top of it to make it even easier. But why is Charles Fitzgerald, MS’s general manager for platform technologies, saying “People who do (AJAX development) are rocket scientists ?" |
At first I thought the plug-in was more or less useless... not anymore | |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1965] | Did I forget to mention that a Rebol/plugin will be made for Firefox ?! |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1966x3] | dunno - but AJAX is imo just proving the idea of rich apps we do have with Rebol. If not, they would be satisfied with browsers and few widgets as is :-)) So AJAX is just kind of rebol aproach inside browser. Let's make proper plugins, improve VID and bye bye AJAX :-) |
DideC: no, that is complete news not mentioned by anyone .... where will that group be present? Because I have rather strong objection against route we took with plug-in ... | |
I do not agree to its design in some basic stage - like having only one plug-in per page etc. Other things have to be decided BEFORE development starts .... e.g. how will you configure it (Flash does so with right-mouse click), but rebol has legitimate usage for right-mouse click. Proxy detection was not correct and now there is a question, if we should go and tunnel network communication using networking available to browser or not ... | |
Terry 3-Oct-2005 [1969] | By having AJAX makes the need for a Rebol plugin LESS necessary. than if there was no AJAX. |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1970] | It's a kind os scoop Carl give us at dinner. Very few people at the table. |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1971x2] | I say exactly that - AJAX is just quick hack become overhyped and later on they will tell - you know - we know how to do things .... simply they go after creation of rich apps inside the browser, nothing more ... |
os scoop? | |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1973x2] | But I think it's useless to ask "when", as usually. |
os=of | |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1975] | DideC - was there any talk about VID and its redesign? It was mentioned several times here or there ... |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1976] | Yes it was.... |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1977] | What had Carl in mind? We have just slides of his presentation, some mention of Confabulator, thousands of widgets, VID redone, top window transparency etc. Anything concrete? |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1978x2] | - I have ask for a package of new and more advanced styles, based on the one already available from Cyphre, Romano, Amon, me... not sure it will happen. - Some asked to replace VID by RebGUI (I'm not for that) - Carl said that the question need reflection : can VID be reworked and enhanced, or should it be replace by RebGUI or something new. It still an open question. |
My understanding of Carl speach is (but I could have misenderstood some things : not native english speaker) : | |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1980] | After what you say here I once again get impression, that nothing really concrete is in the pipeline :-) Just outlined questions, not even plan? :-) |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1981x3] | - He want to grow the community x10 - Rebol and Altme will sort of merge into Rebol/Platform (?!) - Coop and Altme 2.0 will be based on it (or are they the same thing ?) |
I have the same felling. Carl's speach was not very clear to me, but again, it was my first hours of "full" english exchange. Wait for the video to be sure !!!! | |
felling=feeling | |
Tomc 3-Oct-2005 [1984] | grr... if rebol and altme are to merge then the single point of failure model HAS to go. |
Graham 3-Oct-2005 [1985] | you want multiple points of failure instead ? ;) |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1986] | :-)) |
Tomc 3-Oct-2005 [1987] | I want to only have myself to blame |
Graham 3-Oct-2005 [1988] | Great, we can blame Tomc now :) |
Tomc 3-Oct-2005 [1989] | since my users will be blaming me anyway |
Pekr 3-Oct-2005 [1990x2] | :-)) |
Graham in a good mood? :-) | |
Tomc 3-Oct-2005 [1992] | his devcon drip has started... the seisures should end soon |
Graham 3-Oct-2005 [1993] | I'm a feelin a better since I have managed to squash an annoying bug I created that occurred using BEER :) |
Terry 3-Oct-2005 [1994] | What do you call a bug when using BEER? A hangover. |
DideC 3-Oct-2005 [1995] | :)) |
Allen 3-Oct-2005 [1996] | Terry. Enjoy the short window of opportunity that ajax gives. Only problem I see is that as the new wave of exploits and spyware are written around it, people will lock their browsers down even further... and it will be killed off. I give it 3 years. |
Terry 3-Oct-2005 [1997] | The foundation of AJAX is XMLHttpRequest.. all that does is request (via GET or POST) some data without refreshing the page... no more dangerous than a URL redirection script. |
Allen 4-Oct-2005 [1998x2] | It can be used in similar ways that cross-frame with cross domain posting used to be, and of course there are some nice third party cookie tricks too. |
I'm not against AJAX, but I already deal with problems because some govt departments have locked down their users so hard that javascript is turned off. | |
Benjamin 4-Oct-2005 [2000] | we have flash to do this kind of things, with 97% of browsers enabled, any whay i guess there are many options why to focus just in ajax ? |
older newer | first last |