World: r3wp
[!RebGUI] A lightweight alternative to VID
older newer | first last |
Pekr 24-Dec-2007 [7133] | svn://svn.geekisp.com/rebgui - is the correct address. All I need to do is to go up to see RebGUI dir, click on it, and select Update from right context menu in my file manager. Works here ... |
sqlab 24-Dec-2007 [7134] | If you add ?format=raw to the url Ashley gave, it is working So just write %tour.r read http://trac.geekisp.com/rebgui/browser/tour.r?format=raw |
btiffin 24-Dec-2007 [7135] | Ashley; RebDOC.r Nice. Way nice. |
Graham 24-Dec-2007 [7136] | This is a philosophical dispute ... but there is nothing to stop Robert uploading his tree widget etc under another name to the svn, and we can optionally choose to use it. |
Reichart 24-Dec-2007 [7137] | Agreed, and it seems time (and a good move) to simply offer RebGUI Core, and RebGUI Robust, no? |
Graham 24-Dec-2007 [7138x2] | Well, if everything is factored like it is now, we can just include other widgets in rebgui-widgets.r as we need them. |
Ashley, was it deliberate decision to remove the functions tab from tour.r ? | |
Reichart 24-Dec-2007 [7140x2] | There is something nice though about making it clear in the name what you have, and why it is where it is. I agree with Ashley completely in that RebGUI should remain small, and simple. This seems like a way that everyone can be pretty happy. |
I was going to post this in !Qtask, but it applies here too... http://www.qtask.com/qwiki.cgi?mode=previewSynd&uuid=VXACRJTP9S31QF517PEJ1EC383QT | |
Graham 24-Dec-2007 [7142x3] | the request-dir function has lost the "home" button so there's no way of backing upwards in a directory tree. |
from where you started | |
the neat scroll-panel now means I can have enormously wide tab-panels :) | |
Pekr 24-Dec-2007 [7145x2] | Reichart: Microsoft - "Never require users to click an object to determine if it is clickable. Users must be able to determine clickability by visual inspection alone." Hahaha :-) That one is really nice. It is related to AltME group chat, where I wondered, how's that clicking radio-button brings you to entirely new sub-screen :-) |
btw - nice description of Quilt. First "screenshot" shown - it looks like native app, much better than what Qtask is using now. Hopefully it is faster .... | |
Ashley 24-Dec-2007 [7147] | was it deliberate decision to remove the functions tab from tour.r Yes, RebDOC now covers the same ground. My goal is to pull the content across from %tour.r into RebDOC and then obsolete it (%tour.r that is). In RebDOC the examples will become stand-alone scripts. RebGUI Core ... I like it, and it means we can distinguish general RebGUI app issues from RebGUI Core issues (e.g. keyboard navigation is a core issue, lack of a domain specific "bells & whistle" widget a RebGUI app issue). For me the line is quite simple: if it is an issue that can be fixed by creating a new widget (either from scratch or based on an existing one) then it is probably an app issue; if it is an issue that effects most if not all widgets and / or the fix is to the RebGUI engine itself (e.g. a %rebgui-* script) then it is probably a core issue. request-dir function has lost the home" button" ... yep. The old request-dir function was dynamic and only read dirs as needed. The new one, due to the "static" nature of tree, pre-reads all dirs. It's also lost the "make dir" button. These features maybe important to us as developers, but if users need to navigate the entire file system or create dirs to use an app then the native request-file is probably a better choice. The [new] request-dir is really intended for the simple "which of these directories or sub-directories do you want to use" case, and assumes the developer will use the /path refinement to start in the relevant directory. These changes were requested by one of my clients who didn't want their staff "seeing stuff they shouldn't and creating directories everywhere". neat scroll-panel now means I can have enormously wide tab-panels ... I had that in mind when I created it! Note that the horizontal and vertical sliders only appear as needed and the space they occupy is given back to the child widget. Also note that the button on the extreme bottom right of scroll-panel toggles between "home" and "end". |
Reichart 24-Dec-2007 [7148] | RebGUI core - Agreed. |
Graham 24-Dec-2007 [7149x7] | Only minus with wide tab-panels is that I have to go right to get to the right tab, and then scroll left to see the left hand contents of that tab. |
Maybe we need a "reading ..." flash for the request-dir as it reads it's data | |
Also, would it feasible to include in rebgui/core a way to size check boxes ? I am trying to overlay some widgets on a PNG of a PDF so that users can take existing PDF forms and overlay the correct widgets for data entry. | |
ie. size as rectangles or boxes | |
and color | |
this is an example http://synapse-images.s3.amazonaws.com/cms1500-1.png | |
I've got a couple of check boxes over the first two check boxes of the PNG. | |
Ashley 24-Dec-2007 [7156] | I've had to do something similar and you really need pixel-level precision with a domain specific app (or widget). Isn't that hard as the number of form elements is limited. The version I was doing was trying to automatically place and size fields after filtering the form to create a B&W image (for element placement purposes). Another approach might be to create a widget that lets you easily move and size boxes, then save the face offsets and sizes and apply them to a RebGUI display that has the same number of widgets in the same order. I'll take a look at check, led and radio-group sizing later this week. All these widgets *should* be able to scale without a problem (much like symbol does). In fact I was contemplating using webding symbols (for the tick and cross) in lieu of draw. |
Reichart 24-Dec-2007 [7157] | Would be cool if you think of it in terms of simply clicking inside the center of a printed checkbox, and the widget-checkbox simply scales (expands) until it hits the edges, and then some (several more pixels). In theory you could do the same thing for areas where you are meant to fill in hand written items as well. Basically looking at where the cursor was clicked, "falling" down until you hit a line, then expanding left and right until you hit stuff. I designed a cool tool about 20 years ago called Snarfit that allowed artist to just draw where ever they wanted, and then it would grab everything on the page and save them out as separate objects. It basically looked for blank space, and sucked up to the objects. ~ sad when we have to be compatible with printed technology. We are about to undertake a huge project of making Qtask a Content Management system for scanned images. I plan to make it just like Google maps, where the images are scalable (in chunks) and then you can draw on them, add tasks (as PostIts), etc. |
Graham 24-Dec-2007 [7158x4] | My plan ( provisional ) was to turn the PDF into a PNG, and map the widgets to the PNG. With that in mind, I know the relative displacements to the pdf which I would then turn into an EPS. I can then turn my widget content into postscript and write that onto of the eps to give me perfect printouts. |
I'm not sure pixed perfect is needed... just invisible widgets of approx the same size as the PNG background fields. | |
ontop of the eps... | |
invisible widget outlines | |
Robert 25-Dec-2007 [7162] | RebGUI/Core - Forking: I agree with you. I have talked about this with Cyphre too. I think developing a simple but layerable toolkit is the way to go. But it's hard, because there are a lot of different requirements coming up when doing an appplication. I think I will provide my RebGUI fork on my web-site and try to document all the differences. |
Ashley 25-Dec-2007 [7163] | pixel perfect ... not so much perfect, but more the fact that RebGUI deals in units (default of 4 pixels per unit) which probably is a bit course if you're just going to use straight displays without manually setting offsets and sizes. |
Robert 25-Dec-2007 [7164x2] | Normaly I'm not a big forking-fan, because it wastes ressources. I preferr to help the mainstream distribution by contributing my stuff too. |
Much in the spirit of the once discussed RPC (Rebol Professional Community). Focusing our efforts should help us all to move forward much faster. And since RebGUI is really a nice piece I'm more than commited to help it evolve. | |
Ashley 25-Dec-2007 [7166] | I agree, and thanks. |
Reichart 25-Dec-2007 [7167] | Cool...Robert, will you set up the same SVN and Trac interface? |
Graham 25-Dec-2007 [7168] | rebgui's trac/svn is being sponsored by Jaime. |
Reichart 25-Dec-2007 [7169] | He has not gotten back to me in Email of note |
Graham 25-Dec-2007 [7170] | phone?? |
Reichart 25-Dec-2007 [7171] | Hmm, I don't know that I have a "phone" number for him...I did talk to him on Skype, but don't see his contact now that I look...I have a LOT of people in my skyp |
Graham 25-Dec-2007 [7172x3] | His company pages are still up http://www.whywire.net/contactUs.html |
Anyway, it's only $5 a month to get an account on geekisp.com | |
I had one but let it lapse because I had too much trac spam. | |
Reichart 25-Dec-2007 [7175] | OK, I shot an email to those addresses too. |
Graham 25-Dec-2007 [7176x4] | Could always use Curecode .. which is being actively developed by Dockimbel |
http://softinnov.org:8000/curecode/ | |
I'm having a brain blockage .. :( | |
Given tab-panel data [ "panel1" [ ] "panel2" [ ] ] button "Change layout in panel1" [ how do I do this? ] | |
Reichart 25-Dec-2007 [7180] | Ashley, a gift if you want it http://www.qtask.com/files.cgi/ForAshley?tab=get&uuid=9GDW7JPA1J8M822FQ5PD2RYC45QT&filename=For Ashley Also, if you want any changes it should take seconds. I did this because while looking at all the polished logos for Ruby I looked at the RegGUI logo and...well... |
Pekr 25-Dec-2007 [7181] | looks cool ... |
Graham 25-Dec-2007 [7182] | opens as octet stream |
older newer | first last |