World: r3wp
[!RebGUI] A lightweight alternative to VID
older newer | first last |
Henrik 24-Aug-2005 [1836x2] | does clear-face <face> work? |
don't mind me... I'm going to post the wrong things in the wrong groups so no one else has to! (sorry) | |
Ashley 24-Aug-2005 [1838] | Graham, display "" [field [show-text face "" rebfocus face]] but wrapping this in a 'clear-face func is the way to go. Thanks, added to the list. |
Graham 24-Aug-2005 [1839x2] | Ahh. so I needed the rebfocus face to set the text cursor correctly. |
Shouldn't that be part of show-text ? If you're going to preset a number of fields eg. to reset some defaults, you don't really want to rebfocus face on each one as well as do a show-text ? | |
Ashley 24-Aug-2005 [1841x2] | Depends. Take the following code: display "" [ a: field "A" b: field "B" c: field "C" button "Clear" [ show-text a "" show-text b "" show-text c "" ] ] Clicking "Clear" first behaves as we expect, but clicking in a field then "Clear" is problematic. The solution, as in VID, is to unfocus whenever soemthing else is clicked on. Added to the list. |
Pekr, the RebGUI resizing model is simple and works well. The "problems" you are now seeing are caused by the fact that the latest build prevents widgets being assigned negative size values (which prevents one class of errors (sporadic crashes) but can cause anomalies when windows are resized below a certain point). RebGUI assumes that if you allow widgets to be resized you will *also* specify a window min-size that can comfortably hold all widgets. The next build will include an updated %tour.r and documentation that addresses this. | |
Volker 24-Aug-2005 [1843] | Could rebgui calculate a minimal size for a layout? |
Ashley 24-Aug-2005 [1844x2] | Go here for a list of all other issues: http://www.dobeash.com/it/rebgui/issues.html |
Volker; difficult as min-size includes OS-specific title-bar and borders, and RebGUI displays can be dynamically extended *after* the window they appear in is displayed (I don't believe that min-size can be changed / reset after the face has been viewed). | |
Volker 24-Aug-2005 [1846] | But you could prevent the layout from beeing smaller, even if not fully visible? Instead of having negative offsets or this 0-thing? |
Ashley 25-Aug-2005 [1847] | Certainly, and indeed that was how it was handled before I "discovered" min-size ... but handling this non-natively (i.e. not via min-size) looks and feels a bit crude as well as being inconsistent with how other [non-REBOL] apps handle resize. |
Volker 25-Aug-2005 [1848x2] | i would use a combination, window with min-size, but if min-size is smaller than min-layout-size, dont shrink layout further. keeps at least layout intact and user can resize back. |
since users (or Pekr;) see a destroyed layout the current way. | |
Ashley 25-Aug-2005 [1850] | But this allows you to resize a window below an invisible threshold only to have your resize [partially] ignored when the layout jumps back to it's minimum size. I still maintain that setting a realistic min-size is not only subjective but the role of the GUI designer ... if RebGUI tries to infer this setting it will invariably get it wrong ("why did it let my title field shrink to less than three characters ... everyone knows a one-char field is useless" type of issues). |
Volker 25-Aug-2005 [1851x2] | No, this allows the layout to jump back to a bigger size if the designer made a mistake with min-size. |
would work too if you keep negative sizes. but you dont, you turn them to 0, thus losing information. thus not beeing able to react to re-increasing correctly. or maybe i understand something wrong? | |
Ashley 25-Aug-2005 [1853x2] | Correct, the code in question prior to latest build was: if find face/span #"W" [face/size/x: face/size/x + delta/x] if find face/span #"H" [face/size/y: face/size/y + delta/y] which works well except that negative sizes seem to cause downstream problems. Suffice it to say that I'm now leaning towards a layout-min-size model to at least prevent negative sizes in the first place! ;) Good discussion. |
Graham, are you sure the disappearing text-list slider problem wasn't just the fact that all rows fit? Try the following code: b: copy [] repeat i 1000 [insert tail b i] display "Test" compose/deep [ text-list #H data [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] text-list #H data [(b)] ] When you maximize the window you'll see that the sliders only appear if needed. | |
Graham 25-Aug-2005 [1855x5] | sure .. but I'll check. |
Yep, my demo has 6 or so items in the text-list, and when you max the window, only 3 show with loss of the sliders. | |
And in your example, the right hand text list demonstrates this point for me losing it's sliders as well as another problem - a tiny square widget. | |
rather, a wafer thin widget. | |
Perhaps you're using a fixed version of rebgui? | |
Ashley 25-Aug-2005 [1860] | Yep, chalk that up as another thing fixed in 0.3.5. ;) The wafer thin dragger is still a problem though. |
Graham 26-Aug-2005 [1861x3] | display "" [ area 50x20 #WH slider 5x20 #H data [arrows]] do-events This doesn't resize properly in that the slider keeps its absolute x position. |
When items are placed at absolute positions, they don't resize. So, how about we do a at 50%x30% ?? | |
or at 50x20 #H to indicate vertical resizing ? | |
Ashley 26-Aug-2005 [1864] | First problem is fixed easily enough: display "" [ area 50x20 #WH slider 5x20 #XH data [arrows]] ; note the #X directive Not sure what the second issue is as: display "" [at 20x20 area 50x20 #WH slider 5x20 #XH data [arrows]] seems to work well enough. |
Graham 26-Aug-2005 [1865x3] | but not if u do this display "" [at 20x20 area 50x20 #WH slider 5x20 #XH data [arrows] at 20x5 0 area 50x5 #WH ] do-events |
#X directive noted .. thanks. | |
And #Y directive seems to fix my other problems :) | |
Ashley 26-Aug-2005 [1868] | Not so much an absolute positioning problem as a by-product of RebGUI's simplistic resizing model. Compare: display "" [field #WH field #WH return field #WH field #WH] with: display "" [field #H field #WH return field #Y field #YW] This limitation is by design so won't be changing any time soon (I tend to design GUIs that conform to it naturally ... but that may be just me ;) ) |
Graham 26-Aug-2005 [1869] | In this example I can't get vertical positioning working display "" [ at 0x150 text-list 30x15 #YH data [ "Joe" "Adam" "Bill" "Artur" "Phil" "Simone" ] [ show-text chattofld pick face/data first face/picked ] chatarea: area 150x10 #YWH "Intra office chat appears here" slider 5x10 #YXH data [arrows] at 32x160 chattofld: field 15 #Y chatfld: field 140 #YW [ show-text chatarea rejoin [ chatarea/text newline chattofld/text ": " chatfld/text] show-text chatfld "" rebfocus chatfld ] ] do-events |
BrianW 26-Aug-2005 [1870x2] | neat. got my very simple gui app working in View, and I'm suddenly overwhelmed by the urge to try it with RebGUI instead. |
How do I right-align the text in a field? | |
Graham 26-Aug-2005 [1872] | right |
Henrik 26-Aug-2005 [1873] | field font [align: 'right] should work |
BrianW 26-Aug-2005 [1874] | perfect, thanks |
Ashley 26-Aug-2005 [1875] | Graham, best you can do is remove #Y directive from first 3 widgets. To make things even clearer, revert the span-resize function to its pre-0.3.4 definition (i.e. replace the following: ; protect against negative sizes if find face/span #"W" [ ... ] if find face/span #"H" [ ... ] with: if find face/span #"W" [face/size/x: face/size/x + delta/x] if find face/span #"H" [face/size/y: face/size/y + delta/y] in %rebgui.r (as has been done in the next build). |
Graham 26-Aug-2005 [1876x4] | ok. |
I've got to keep the #Y as otherwise the top three widgets don't move down on resizing ( there are widgets not shown above them ). | |
that change doesn't seem to have helped :( | |
Oh, and how do I scroll the text in the chatarea using the slider? | |
Ashley 26-Aug-2005 [1880] | The area widget, like text-list, should have a slider that appears as needed. Hope to have that in the next build. |
Graham 26-Aug-2005 [1881] | Ok. |
Graham 27-Aug-2005 [1882] | The action associated with the first tab of a tab-panel does not fire when first viewed ... wonder if that should be the case. |
Graham 28-Aug-2005 [1883x2] | Is there a way to alter the spacing vertically in a check-group? It doesn't respond to space nxn ... |
Do group-boxes resize? | |
Ashley 28-Aug-2005 [1885] | No, but they should. |
older newer | first last |