World: r3wp
[SDK]
older newer | first last |
Gregg 13-Dec-2009 [1519] | In my old VB days, large fonts was a major bugbear. |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1520] | That may also be the problem...some of the officers have bad eyes and may have increased font size..I'll check it out. Thanks for the hints Gregg. |
amacleod 15-Dec-2009 [1521] | New element to the puzzle.... I got it to work on the offending machine but only if the app is NOT located on the desktop. When placed in its own folder under c: it works fine. |
Maxim 15-Dec-2009 [1522] | that is totally weird! |
amacleod 15-Dec-2009 [1523x2] | There might be some unusual disokay properties set but I do not have access to them it seems... |
display = disokay | |
Maxim 15-Dec-2009 [1525] | the only problem I've ever had with apps on the desktop is with the spaces in the file path. |
Graham 15-Dec-2009 [1526] | I check for desktop and warn users that the app might not run correctly. |
amacleod 15-Dec-2009 [1527] | Graham, you have had issues running from desktop? or is that your advice? |
Graham 15-Dec-2009 [1528] | Yes, issues running from desktop ... so don't advise it .. and I specifically check for desktop installation and alert user not to do this ... |
amacleod 15-Dec-2009 [1529] | Is this a bug in rebol encap? Or do other platforms have this same issue? |
BenBran 6-Jan-2010 [1530] | Not sure where to put this so asking here: I downloaded a web script and it has a snippet I don't understand: buffer: make string! 1024 ;; contains the browser request file: "index.html" parse buffer ["get" ["http" | "/ " | copy file to " " ]] what does: copy file to " " mean or do? tia |
Graham 6-Jan-2010 [1531x4] | copies everything after the http till it reaches a space to a variable named file |
or after the "/" if there is no http | |
eh ... no that either | |
everything after get that is not / or http ... | |
BrianH 6-Jan-2010 [1535] | Moved the question to Parse. |
Graham 6-Jan-2010 [1536] | [ copy question to end ( append parse-channel question) ] |
amacleod 28-Jan-2010 [1537] | From the new products page: REBOL Technologies has changed its product catalog. REBOL/Command features are now part of REBOL/SDK. We've eliminated the standard REBOL/SDK. We also will be lowering our pricing for these products accordingly. How does this affect current sdk owners? Can we download command sdk and use with our key? |
Graham 28-Jan-2010 [1538] | well, the corrollary of that is .. do existing sdk/command users get a refund ... |
DideC 1-Feb-2010 [1539] | Well, generally when you buy a TV 1000$ and the price get to down to 800$ 2 month later, the shop does not refund the difference. So why RT whould ? Or maybe just those who buy this month (if there is some) ! |
Graham 1-Feb-2010 [1540x3] | That was my point ... |
But there are some stores that do! | |
And they're the ones who have loyal customers forever :) | |
DideC 11-Feb-2010 [1543] | Yes but only if you bought the TV a short time before tre price goes down. Not years. |
Graham 24-Feb-2010 [1544] | Is this longest period we have not had a SDK follow a new release? |
BrianH 1-Mar-2010 [1545] | New 2.7.7 SDK release: http://www.rebol.com/sdk.html |
Pekr 2-Mar-2010 [1546] | where's the download link? |
Claude 2-Mar-2010 [1547x3] | i think you must ask for it !!!! |
but it's very sad, we must paid for the upgrade even if you buy the sdk before last year !!!! | |
perhaps, it will be a good idea to make a link with purchase condition for sdk buyer before last year. | |
Pekr 2-Mar-2010 [1550] | I still hope it is an ommision? SDK does not imo contain license key, and it was always available to download IIRC. |
Graham 2-Mar-2010 [1551x2] | Not always, just in recent years. |
This need to purchase the sdk if you bought it over a year ago seems a little arbitrary ... normally this implies that there has been a year's worth of upgrades and fixes over the one year period, but the last sdk release was over 2 years ago. | |
Henrik 2-Mar-2010 [1553x2] | I would want a clear upgrade system. For some reason I ignored the yellow box at the top. Now it's more clear, but I still think it needs some work. |
Graham, in principle, Carl could be speculating in not doing upgrades for 366 days, which I think is too easy to perceive as sinister. Everyone else do it on version numbers, not time period. Time periods are used during the final weeks before an upgrade, so a purchase right before an upgrade doesn't seem unreasonable. Also he says "within the last year", but from what specific date? Is this a one time offer? | |
Graham 2-Mar-2010 [1555x4] | Looking at the changes http://www.rebol.com/docs/changes-2-7.html is there really any need to upgrade to 2.7.7 ? |
We can add the mezzainine stuff ourselves | |
So, really it makes it even more pointless charging for the upgrade | |
And there doesn't seem to be an upgrade path ... so looks like he is asking us to purchase it again | |
Henrik 2-Mar-2010 [1559] | I don't mind paying for it, just to be clear. But, yes, the upgrade path is not clear. |
Graham 2-Mar-2010 [1560] | What exactly do you gain by purchasing it again?? |
TomBon 2-Mar-2010 [1561] | a better karma and some extrapoints für you kudos-system graham :-)) |
Henrik 2-Mar-2010 [1562] | and Carl not starving to death. |
Graham 2-Mar-2010 [1563] | I've already purchased View/Pro, SDK linux and 2 x SDK/command windows |
Cyphre 2-Mar-2010 [1564] | Maybe it would make more sense if Carl put 'Donate' icon on RT's site instead of charging loyal SDK users again :-) |
Graham 2-Mar-2010 [1565] | We're already donating our time too |
Henrik 2-Mar-2010 [1566] | Well, time donations don't give him food on the table. A better option would be licensing of proprietary tech, rather than selling products. |
Graham 2-Mar-2010 [1567x2] | Maybe I can click on some of those new googleads instread! |
Eric Raymond considers users who donate time to be very important .. http://catb.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s04.html presumably because they will continue to donate time but would not donate $$ | |
older newer | first last |