World: r3wp
[SDK]
older newer | first last |
Maxim 23-Sep-2009 [1470x4] | thanks ... knowing that the header was not in cause... alllowed me to find the true culprit .... some prerebol oditty which wrapped my entire code in a block (my fault in how I was using it). |
strabge thing is that it was still running after encap... very weird. | |
(strange) | |
there is a nice feeling about seeing a 450kb 20 file REBOL script being linked as one source , then add another 400 kb of view encap code over it and it all works... 850 kb of REBOL is a hell of a lot of code... I can't imagine how much code that would be in C !!! :-) | |
Henrik 23-Sep-2009 [1474] | Some customers also get a little weirded out, when they see that my biggest programs take 2-3 seconds to download and about 0.1 seconds to install and start. |
Ashley 24-Sep-2009 [1475] | I've had that a few times, "where's the rest of the application ..." |
amacleod 3-Oct-2009 [1476x2] | I notice the icon of my encapped application displays info about rebol -company name, file version etc... Anyway to get my info and file version for the App in there? If so - Can this be done when encapping or to I need to change it afterward. It it indeed the icon that holds this info? |
I guess I could use resource hacker...but is there a way to automate it during ENCAP | |
Henrik 3-Oct-2009 [1478] | I wrote a function that called encap followed by reshack to solve the problem. |
amacleod 3-Oct-2009 [1479x2] | What did you use a reshack script? |
I tried to make a reshack script to change the icon image but I could not get it to work...will have another look.. | |
Henrik 3-Oct-2009 [1481] | I simply used CALL to call encap and reshack sequentially. Kind of a make-file. |
Maxim 4-Oct-2009 [1482x3] | I have massive make files like this which do all kinds of script fixup, directory creations, zipping of archives, backups... and call res hacker... its the easiest way to encap stuff. |
note that the icon has to be of an exact specification... you can't replace just any icon. basically, there are 9 sizes/colors in the icon, and you have to use EXACTLY the same setup. | |
in the SDK docs, there is an example of a reshacker script call. | |
amacleod 4-Oct-2009 [1485] | I've been able to change my icon with res hacker's ui but not via a script...i'll have another look at the SDK doc example... |
Ashley 5-Oct-2009 [1486] | http://www.dobeash.com/RebGUI/cookbook.html#section-2.3 |
amacleod 5-Oct-2009 [1487] | Thanks, Ashley, I had seen this help page before but I did not remember ResHack stuff in it...Great! |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1488x2] | Getting a weird behavior with an encapped app.... It works fine on most computers but on one computer an image in the face is not displaying properly... its as if white space is being added to the right and bottom sides throwing of the layout. I tried placing in a box with specific size. THis retains the basic layout but the image is squeezed up into a part of the box. Only a problem on one computer so far ... |
as a script I do not see this issue... | |
Graham 13-Dec-2009 [1490x3] | different OS? |
different service pack? | |
what have you tried so far to debug this? | |
Maxim 13-Dec-2009 [1493x2] | carefull... graham will give you his paypal account after ;-P |
I've never seen that artefact appear. did you try changing the image? | |
Graham 13-Dec-2009 [1495] | Yeah .. I need to increase the amount of my bounty since no one is biting :) |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1496] | 3 computers > XP pro and 1 > vista laptop. Offending machine > xp pro |
Graham 13-Dec-2009 [1497] | and have you determined whether it's specific to XP? Or just to that PC? |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1498] | I originaly just had teh pic displayed in a layout with "image pic" I later put in a 'box with specified size (matching the resolution of image) |
Maxim 13-Dec-2009 [1499] | that is what image style is ;-) |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1500x2] | It appears to be just that machine but I tried it on an other machine with same hardware with no prob |
oh | |
Maxim 13-Dec-2009 [1502] | did you try different images? |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1503x3] | The image was creaed from a layout (to-image) |
created | |
But the layout also contains a jpg | |
Maxim 13-Dec-2009 [1506] | and you are sure the image itself doesn't have the artefact? (llooking into picture viewer, for eample) |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1507x2] | I can't play with different images now as the offending computer is at work...I'll play with it tomorrow night.. Just wanted to see if it was a common problem.. Thanks |
jpeg looks clean and displays proper everywhere else | |
Maxim 13-Dec-2009 [1509x2] | there is a strange bug in view where face with edges need a color to be specified. if color is none I've seen screwy thing happen with the edges. |
but this just happens in some parent/child face nesting circumstance which I don't recall. | |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1511] | I'll try some other pics tomorrow night...its got to be something with the jpeg.. |
Maxim 13-Dec-2009 [1512] | try making sure each face has a color, if you see the problem again, with another image. |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1513] | Why only that computer and only when encapped is my question.. The work computer is FDNY property and locked down somewhat so its hard to debug if its the computer's issue... |
Maxim 13-Dec-2009 [1514] | to me its the "only when encapped" part which is the strangest! |
Graham 13-Dec-2009 [1515] | Especially if the image is part of the binary |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1516] | it is |
Gregg 13-Dec-2009 [1517] | Is the offending system set to use large fonts, or does it have a funky video setting (different DPI) that might be the culprit? |
amacleod 13-Dec-2009 [1518] | The screen does look off (aspect and resolution wise) but I can't check as the display properties access seems to be locked down for security... |
Gregg 13-Dec-2009 [1519] | In my old VB days, large fonts was a major bugbear. |
older newer | first last |