World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
Pekr 7-Aug-2006 [771x2] | thanks ... the problem probably was, that for a directory, there needs to be "execute" bit set, or you can't enter it ... |
and is there difference between small and capital "s"? | |
Tomc 7-Aug-2006 [773x2] | yes the entire path of dirs to your target need to be executable to get there |
lower s it the "sticky" bit for dirs to cause item under them to take on the same permissions and ownership only applies to directories owner and group (but effects files) upper case S I am not recalling off the top of my head ... applies to files scriptable or sockets or something | |
Pekr 7-Aug-2006 [775x2] | I thought the sticky bit is T? |
but I understand what you mean ... | |
Gabriele 7-Aug-2006 [777] | on dirs, read means you can list the contents, write means you can remove/add files to the dir, and execute means you can access the files in the dir. |
Pekr 7-Aug-2006 [778x3] | what do you mean "access files in the dir"? |
the strange thing was, that I was able to read directory content and print it to the browser, just write %../db/log.txt failed .... | |
and I had "write" enabled - rw-rw-rw (666) .... | |
Tomc 7-Aug-2006 [781] | on solaris sticky bit is 's' i would be suprised if linux strayed that much |
Gabriele 8-Aug-2006 [782x4] | write access means you can add files to the dir, but to write on them you need to be able to access files in the dir which is the execute bit. i think you can probably use the touch command to create new files on dirs with rw- (not sure though) but for complete access to a dir you need rwx. |
to restate: with --x you can read/write a file in the dir (provided the file is readable/writeable, and you know the name), but you cannot list the dir contents, and you cannot add/remove files. | |
with r-x you can read/write files and list the dir contents, but not add/remove files | |
with rwx you can do everything. | |
Pekr 8-Aug-2006 [786] | thanks Gabriele, now things are more clear to me! |
Rebolek 26-Sep-2006 [787] | my linux troubles (this is longer) I'm pretty frustrated at this moment, maybe somebody can help me... I'm linux newbie, I'm using it for 6 months or so. I've installed Ubuntu for my girlfriend and it works OK. So I decided to install linux for me too. I've got Athlon X64 computer, so I tried 64bit version of Ubuntu. But you cannot run 32bit programs under 64bit Linux, so no REBOL or AltMe. OK, I can live with 32bit linux, no problem. So I installed MEPIS. It's not bad, it has got media support but...it's KDE. I never knew anything about KDE vs. Gnome vs. whatever wars, I just don't care, but day after day I found KDE to be bloated, slow and buggy. Compared to elegance of Ubuntu on my girfriend's computer I decided that I just don't like KDE, I don't like all that menus where I'm always lost, long loading times, that awful blue theme, childish icons and everything K-labeled. Every window and every button on KDE looks so BIG compared to windows GUI, it's just a waste of screens's space. So I tried different window managers and found Xfce, icebox and some other small and fast window managers. But running MEPIS with different window manager than KDE was not optimal so I decided to remove MEPIS and install xubuntu. Everything was OK and I had xubuntu instaled. One day later I managed to exchange my gfx card. I was using Matrox Millenium 2MB PCI card and exchanged it for 3D labs Banshee 16MB PCI card (I know that both cards are somehow underpowered for my computer but that's OK, I don't play any 3d games, so I don't need some new card). I've booted into Windows and everything was OK. I can even select resolution better than 1024x768 (because that's not optimal resolution for 21" monitor :-) So I restarted and booted into xubuntu. x-server didn't start. As I said, I'm linux newbie so I don't want to mess with some config files so I said to myself OK, I reinstall it, it's just one day old installation, no problem. I've booted the live-cd, grub let me choose resolution of 1280x1024, I booted xubuntu and - it was running in 640x480. Yes, I had the choice to change resolution - but only to 320x240. I tried ubuntu (gnome) and it was the same. ubuntu's x-server probably does not support my banshee gfx card. I tried MEPIS also and - it worked! I can boot mepis 3.3.1 live cd in 1024x768 (but not more - with windows, I can go up to 1920x1440). But when I boot mepis, I do see that KDE desktop thing and it makes me feel sick (hell, even windows seem to be more fun to use than KDE for me!). So, what now? I cannot use windows only (1. i don't like it :) 2. it's got problems of its own - it cannot download files bigger than cca 1MB without error. Probably some driver problem but I still haven't found a sollution. this is not problem on linux) and I don't like KDE. I know that there's one sollution - to buy relatively new pci-x n-vidia gfx card and problems may be gone. but that's not what I want to do. That 3dfx banshee is good enough for me, I just want some fast and small OS running on it. Maybe I'm just missing a computer that can boot in 15 seconds into full GUI enviroment (yes, my old Amiga :) |
Alan 26-Sep-2006 [788] | I have an AMD 64 bit Acer laptop running Mandriva and have no problem running Rebol/Altme but I use KDE so not sure what would happen if you tried to used another windows manger with it |
Rebolek 26-Sep-2006 [789] | Is Mandriva 64bit? |
Volker 26-Sep-2006 [790x3] | sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg but its ugly, i usually need several tries. keep a backup of /etc/X11/xorg.conf . May also work to get that file from another distro, eg that mephis, and overwrite it. the resolution-stuff etc is in that file. |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=2 thats how to run 32bit on 64bt gentoo. not too easy, but possible. | |
For debian it looks easy for most programms. SInce ubuntu is a debian that trick may work too: https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id292233 | |
Rebolek 26-Sep-2006 [793x3] | thanks, i'll try |
so i've got it working somehow, core works, but view and altme does not run with following error: User Error : REBOL : Cannot obtain default font | |
ah, now it works! :) | |
Anton 27-Sep-2006 [796] | What did you do ? |
Rebolek 27-Sep-2006 [797] | I've searched Synaptic for "font", instaled lot of them, rebooted and it started working :) First I've installed ia32 libraries from Volker's link. |
Anton 27-Sep-2006 [798] | Very good. Good to hear it's working. |
Kaj 27-Sep-2006 [799] | I've heard about that font error from someone who upgraded from Ubuntu Breezy to Ubuntu Dapper. Did you do that? |
Rebolek 27-Sep-2006 [800x2] | no, I installed fresh 64bit Dapper (xubuntu) and tried to run 32bit REBOL/AltMe on it. |
maybe the font problem is xfce related, not 64/32bit. | |
Alan 27-Sep-2006 [802] | Rebolek, yes there is a 64 bit version |
Alan 14-Oct-2006 [803] | just installed Altme on Mandriva 2007 and seems to be working |
Volker 25-Oct-2006 [804] | How do i start a rebol-daemon from ssh? i usually use screen, but this server lacks it. |
Oldes 25-Oct-2006 [805] | I'm not sure what do you mean, if you are in shell just type ./rebol |
Volker 25-Oct-2006 [806] | then it goes down when i log out. |
Oldes 25-Oct-2006 [807] | you must use disown |
Volker 25-Oct-2006 [808] | thanks :) |
Tomc 25-Oct-2006 [809x2] | nohup |
./rebol & | |
Izkata 12-Nov-2006 [811x2] | hrm... |
I just installed Ubuntu (dual-boot on my laptop) and it seems to work fine for everything, even AltME - But I can't seem to get Rebol to even start up. | |
Graham 13-Nov-2006 [813] | Altme is rebol ... |
Anton 13-Nov-2006 [814] | What error message you getting ? Sure you've got the right binary ? |
Izkata 13-Nov-2006 [815x2] | Nevermind... It not running had more to do with me being a complete newb at Linux than anything else. (Being so used to Windows, I didn't realize you had to use "./rebol" rather than just "rebol" to start it up) |
I got distracted and forgot about it just after posting that, so I didn't notice Tomc's post until later on | |
Kaj 13-Nov-2006 [817x2] | That would be for /Core, wouldn't it? For /View, you can just click on it in the graphical user interface like you can with AltME |
To start /Core without the ./ path, you would have to add the path to the $PATH environment variable. The ./ current directory is usually not in there for security reasons | |
Rebolek 14-Nov-2006 [819] | how can I set VIEW-ROOT ? |
Anton 14-Nov-2006 [820] | Um.. is it the REBOL_HOME variable ? try search for that... |
older newer | first last |