World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
Kaj 20-Apr-2006 [619] | I'm making a few mods, though. Like, redesigning the entire system ;-) |
Henrik 20-Apr-2006 [620] | ah, another distro basically? :-) |
Maxim 20-Apr-2006 [621] | I love linux cause its so well designed, in order to use it, you have to fix everything. |
Kaj 20-Apr-2006 [622] | Yup, but deeper than that |
Henrik 20-Apr-2006 [623] | and now we have freedesktop.org and other standards organizations. I think basically it's like shoveling crap uphill. I wonder if it will get anywhere. |
Kaj 20-Apr-2006 [624] | It's an improvement, but as you suspect, far from ideal |
Henrik 20-Apr-2006 [625] | I think the Ubuntu guys are doing a good job. the problem is that there are 20 other organizations that are almost doing the same jobs. it's an incredible waste of time and effort. |
Maxim 20-Apr-2006 [626] | I think we should take AROS and change its name. |
Kaj 20-Apr-2006 [627] | Well, there's exchange of work. The theory in open source is that a certain amount of duplication of work is accepted, because there are many volunteers. What bothers me more is that the resulting products are so bad |
Maxim 20-Apr-2006 [628] | maybe ARIX and say its based on linux but everything was fixed ;-D |
Henrik 20-Apr-2006 [629] | the products are bad because there is no focus or leader with strong visions. it happens occasionally, such as with the XGL desktop work done by Novell. They flat out stated that it would have sucked to do it among the community. Yet the community responded negatively, because the work was not initially shared. sometimes I think they just can't see that the cathedral model of development can be much better if design is very critical. this is the biggest gripe I have with open source. |
Maxim 20-Apr-2006 [630] | it sucks because those with the vision can only do so much on their time. although everyone is happy to say free things are great, free things aren't worth any $$ and thus, you get none to feed your children when you work on them. |
Kaj 20-Apr-2006 [631] | That's not how open source is financed |
Maxim 20-Apr-2006 [632] | depends on the projects. |
Kaj 20-Apr-2006 [633x3] | Exactly |
Ironically, our cathedral-designed Syllable project is a full volunteer effort | |
Funding comes from companies, who all want some influence for it, so you get a bazaar model | |
Maxim 20-Apr-2006 [636] | what happens when 2 companies want the opposite feature? |
Kaj 20-Apr-2006 [637] | The community decides. That's the nicest part of it, a certain fairness |
Graham 21-Apr-2006 [638x2] | how does one start up in level 3 and not level 5 ? |
I can type init 3 once I'm in 5 ... | |
yeksoon 21-Apr-2006 [640] | look under /etc/rc.d/rc5.d that will be the folder for level 5 stuffs |
Volker 21-Apr-2006 [641x2] | something in /etc/inittab, but in my deb it only says # The default runlevel. id:2:initdefault: |
seems the 2 in that line sets the level. http://www.linuxfibel.de/booten.htm (german). | |
Graham 21-Apr-2006 [643x2] | http://www.novell.com/documentation/suse91/suselinux-adminguide/html/ch13s05.html |
yes, looks like. initdefault | |
Oldes 28-Apr-2006 [645x2] | Guess what software Osama Bin Laden uses on his laptop? http://shelleytherepublican.com/2006/04/linux-european-threat-to-our-computers.html |
:-) | |
JaimeVargas 28-Apr-2006 [647] | I can believe this kind of thinking, funny though ;-) |
Anton 3-May-2006 [648] | What's a good linux to install on a Pentium II 300MHz 64MB RAM 3Gig disk ? It's for my flatmate to browse the web. |
yeksoon 3-May-2006 [649] | some guy tested Linux distros on old machine ... http://www.linux.com/print.pl?sid=06/02/13/1854251 the choice of WM will be the key factor, I think. |
Anton 3-May-2006 [650] | This is good, thankyou. |
Kaj 3-May-2006 [651] | www.vectorlinux.com |
Anton 3-May-2006 [652] | I've decided to try Slackware first, so I'm downloading that. |
Anton 4-May-2006 [653x4] | Ok, I've installed Slackware (all the files, apps etc.) onto a Linux ext2 partition, marked as Bootable. But when I reboot, BIOS says "Missing operating system" (boot order is CD, C, floppy) |
Bit confused by that. | |
I chose not to install LILO, because the instructions made it sound like it wasn't necessary. Is that necessary ? | |
I think it is. | |
Henrik 4-May-2006 [657] | yes, either LILO or GRUB |
Anton 4-May-2006 [658x2] | thanks, looking into installing lilo now. |
Looks like there's no way to install lilo if you skip it in setup. Unclear and misleading comments in the setup notes. I have reinstalled successfully from scratch. It seems to me I made two errors the first time around: I had skipped installing both the linux kernel and lilo bootmanager. | |
Anton 5-May-2006 [660] | Woohoo ! Slackware box is up and browsing to rebol.net ! :-) That was pretty easy. |
Ray 1-Jun-2006 [661] | ok...i am a total newbie here. i am trying to get rebol .r scripts to run on a Mandrake linux box, but i just cannot get them to run. they basically only work as text documents. am i missing something? i installed rebol view, which as i understand it installs core also. i want to be able to doulble-click the .r file and have it run. it works in windows. thanks in advance. |
Henrik 2-Jun-2006 [662x3] | the wonderful world of linux... what I had to do was to make scripts as shellscripts with the shebang line at the top with the path to the rebol executable. there is a mention of this in the Rebol/Core manual here: http://rebol.com/docs/core23/rebolcore-2.html This should work across the various desktops. |
looks like rebol/view ubuntu version runs fine on ubuntu dapper | |
it's definitely more stable than some of the gnome apps... :-) | |
Kaj 2-Jun-2006 [665x3] | Unfortunately, the shebang is the wrong way around in the REBOL manual. The best form to use is |
#! /usr/bin/env rebol | |
This should be the most system independent | |
Ray 2-Jun-2006 [668] | ok...so now i am in the midst of another issue |
older newer | first last |