World: r3wp

Anyway... using block or url is same.. the connection is cached... 
right.

url-encode the username. I tried that, did not work.

ok ... need to use the block form then

So I need to add a path in the block statement?

yep

You can see the caching when you do something like:
trace/net on

conn: [scheme: 'ftp  host: "ftp.mysite.org"  user: "[user-:-mysite-:-org]" 
 pass: "xxxxxxxxxx"]
loop 2 [probe read conn]

And last thing - you may need also passive: true in the conn block

Thanks for all the info, I'll try once more.

It's either path or target

Still no luck. I have looked at over 100+ google pages. Does anyone 
have a working example of a tcp connection using the non-standard 
method? So far I have not found one. Plenty of 'examples', but no 
actual working code. None of the 'examples' work for me. Everyone 
seems to be using the standard short method. Graham: Neither Path 
or Target worked. I checked the connection on my website and cpanel 
said I was logged in, so I have a connection, but I cannot get the 
correct syntax for 'write', so it goes back to the scheme host path 
port user pass path etc block. I'll buy someone a pint (I'm a Brit) 
or a cup of coffe for a working example of that code!

ok, you're on.

send the cofffee to me Wellington, NZ thanks

Well, two good friends of mine are moving to NZ at the end of the 
year. I'll ask them to deliver it or buy a fresh one for you when 
they arrive.

remote-spec:  [scheme: 'ftp  host: "ftp.mysite.org"  user: "[user-:-mysite-:-org]" 
 pass: "xxxxxxxxxx"]
local-file: %text.txt

source-port: open/binary/direct/read local-file ; BINARY mode
print "Attempting FTP connection..."


target-port: open/binary/direct/new/write remote-spec ; BINARY mode

insert target-port copy source-port

attempt [close target-port]
attempt [close source-port]

oops pressed send too quickly... not sure I was done...

write [ scheme: 'ftp host: "ftp.compkarori.com" port-id: 21 target: 
%/htdocs/reb/test.txt user: "compka" pass: "*****" ] "hello"

works for me

it's the same as the normal one liner syntax

Moccachino will do fine

my snippet is from a client app of mine and definitively works for 
me

Hold the marsmellow

hehe

my example allows you to insert just a few bytes at a time and update 
a progress bar, if you replace the 'INSERT line by a loop which only 
copies 2000 bytes at a time until the copy returns none

My example just does what you asked for :)

Of course you could use my ftp protocol for Rebol3 if you're brave

I'm not that brave.

ex:

while [buffer: copy/part source-port 2000][
	insert target-port buffer
	prin ">"
]

You have to be brave if you're a soldier in the rebolution!

If you live in the Midlands .. you can visit Sunanda :)

I'm a Brit living in WA state USA. My sister lives in the midlands. 
I'll visit Sunanda next time I visit the UK.

Looks like I owe two coffees. Give me a delivery address(es) and 
I'll oblige. Graham, you will havo to wait until December/January, 
but that's a Moccachino on its way.

hehe

At home we just use those single use Gregg's powdered Mocas that 
you pour into a cup and tip hot water into ... :)

Wow, I'm 80 miles outside Seattle and if any Seattlite heard you 
say that they would shriek!

BTW, we have the "Rebol School" group ... where we *encourage* questions

Always good to encourage questions. Thanks for the code, much appreciated. 
It will take me past this impasse I was in. Thinking about it, I 
must be brave because I want to replace all the PHP code I have written 
for my customers over the last seven years with Rebol code. If that 
is not brave, I don't know what is.

sensible ?

If i get it right, it will prove invaluable to my customers and me, 
as I will have more to offer them. If I don't I can just leave the 
PHP in place. I've been called a practical idealist by some people 
(and much worse by others). Besides, I'll be able to promote Rebol. 
Always a good thing.

Are you switching to using Cheyenne?

I've read about Cheyenne. I probably will when I can code competently 
in Rebol and I have my own server, which are cheap these days. So 
I am on a steep Rebol learning curve right now. I am a fast learner 
when I'm motivated. But Cheyenne will have to wait several months.

its actually about 15 minutes to download install and run on any 
server (or your machine).  and from there, rebol cgi is much faster 
since its persistent.

unless you have specific needs (like https) I really suggest you 
take an hour and look into it.  it might change how you build all 
of your rebol web stuff... better sooner than later no?

I will certainly take a look at Cheyenne before I start doing complex 
stuff, and before I spend time designing this project on paper, which 
I have yet to do. ATM I'm playing around to discover what can be 
done with Rebol.

Ehi, my package its' view, not core!

The last version of Rebview binary it's called "rebol", not rebview 
as usual. It's on rebol.com site.

maybe who made the Linux version applied the wrong name....

Both those ftp code snippets work. Thanks Graham. Thanks Maxim. I'm 
on my Rebol way!

I've also done this to work around the @ issue:


net-utils/url-parser/user-char: union net-utils/url-parser/user-char 
make bitset! #"@"

I think a better solution is to fix the protocols.

Eg. for ftp-protocol, change this 


 open-check: [none ["220" "230"] ["USER" port/user] "331" ["PASS" 
 port/pass] "230" "SYST" "*"]

to


 open-check: [none ["220" "230"] ["USER" dehex port/user] "331" ["PASS" 
 port/pass] "230" "SYST" "*"]