World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
Dockimbel 1-Feb-2010 [3481x2] | I guess that a 2.7.7 SDK should have cured that, View 2.7.7 seems to link to .so.6. |
I've always thought that a gfx engine built in Cheyenne would have brought a nice added value, but it seems that using View is just too much trouble on anything else than Windows. | |
Graham 1-Feb-2010 [3483] | Send Carl a priority feedback ... |
Janko 1-Feb-2010 [3484] | for windows it's very nice to have a taskbar icon and all, but when you run on server I want no view.. I have just command line on all servers anyways |
Graham 1-Feb-2010 [3485x2] | so how do you interact with running servers? |
browser interface? | |
Janko 1-Feb-2010 [3487] | I don't interact.. are there any interaction possible (I know for reload config and restart workers on windows) |
Dockimbel 1-Feb-2010 [3488x3] | My intent with providing a View kernel for Cheyenne was to use it as a general purpose image generation library. But as it fails to accomplish the most basic job of making decent thumbnails, and is quite painfull to run when the required dependencies are not satisfied, it's maybe better to get rid of it. |
are there any interaction possible (I know for reload config and restart workers on windows) Similar interactions are possible on all platforms. For non-Windows systems, use signals : - reload config: kill -HUP <cheyenne-pid> - reset workers: kill -USR1 <cheyenne-pid> - quit: kill <cheyenne-pid> (or CTRL-C if running in foreground) | |
Graham: thanks, I'll try that...I thought that SDKs are supposed to be released with each new R2 version? | |
Graham 1-Feb-2010 [3491] | supposed to be ... |
Oldes 1-Feb-2010 [3492] | For thumbnails I have Imagick binding.. But I must test it with Cheyenne yet. |
Graham 1-Feb-2010 [3493x2] | I just use call with imagemagick ... opn cheyenne |
but windows though | |
Dockimbel 1-Feb-2010 [3495] | CALL on a third party exe works, but that's not a solution able to scale high (not talking about the induced delay of creating and closing a process) |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3496x2] | I've download latest REBOL in Xubuntu. Viewtop opened without problem but when I switched to console, nothing appeared. Because I deselected "show desktop on startup", now I cannot start REBOL at all. Any ideas? |
At least I can run it from console. But I still wonder why it does not work from icon. | |
amacleod 2-Feb-2010 [3498x3] | There is no console for linux...must use linux console. |
if you want to see viewtop start rebol from console and type desktop | |
Once in viewtop try changing the settings back to "open vietwtop on startup" | |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3501] | I just wonder why clicking on the icon does not open rebol in linux console. but i have no problem running it directly from console |
Henrik 2-Feb-2010 [3502] | it's probably simply piping to whatever console it was started from. since the linux desktop has no console, you won't see one. |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3503] | Hm, when I select "Install now" option, I get "segmentation fault" |
Henrik 2-Feb-2010 [3504] | RAMBO it |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3505] | Done, #4751. |
amacleod 2-Feb-2010 [3506x2] | 2.7.7? |
I installed 2.76 on ubuntu no prob | |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3508x2] | yes, 2.7.7 |
Maybe it's fine on Ubuntu, I'm using Xubuntu as the computer is really really old. | |
amacleod 2-Feb-2010 [3510] | might be missing a library file...check the list of required libs...find it somewhere on rebol site??? |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3511] | It's just the installation, everything else seems to work fine |
Pekr 2-Feb-2010 [3512] | ldd lists dependencies in console, no? |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3513] | Well, first I need to get Cheyenne running, so I'll check the dependecies later :) |
amacleod 2-Feb-2010 [3514] | I also installed it on a server version of ubuntu with xfce loaded on top...iirc had to add some libs |
Pekr 2-Feb-2010 [3515] | You mentioned older computer. Is Xubuntu less resource hungry than Ubuntu? |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3516] | Yes, the XFCE desktop should take less memory and CPU than Gnome. |
Pekr 2-Feb-2010 [3517] | And what about Kubuntu? (KDE) |
amacleod 2-Feb-2010 [3518x2] | big and hungry |
like gnome | |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3520] | heh, it's running in 856x600, I see such resolution for the first time |
amacleod 2-Feb-2010 [3521] | What is running? |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3522] | sorry, the linux desktop |
Pekr 2-Feb-2010 [3523] | linuxians try to be always different, hence such a resolution :-) |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3524] | I see :) |
Dockimbel 2-Feb-2010 [3525] | amacleod : I installed 2.76 on ubuntu no prob Which Ubuntu version? |
amacleod 2-Feb-2010 [3526] | it was a while ago...not using that box anymore. |
Barik 2-Feb-2010 [3527] | Hello. How can I create a REBOL service in Linux (i.e, something that can be run as a background process much like httpd via init.d)? |
Henrik 2-Feb-2010 [3528x2] | I suppose you first try to create a script that is launchable via shell, and from then on, it should be the same as for any other service, depending on the distribution. |
launchable = shebang line and all that stuff. | |
Barik 2-Feb-2010 [3530] | I have the #!/usr/local/bin/rebol line and such in there. The problem is that I'm not sure how to make the script then go into the background again like a daemon would do. It stays at the foreground when I call it from something like init.d. |
older newer | first last |