World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
Maxim 17-Dec-2009 [3381] | hehehe I keep reminding... I just like to rub his face in it everytime he mentions R2 ;-) |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3382x10] | Very good :-) |
OS_Create_Process simply does | |
system(call); | |
OS_Browse does | |
system(cmd) | |
with a constructed URL | |
Both have an extra | |
int reserved | |
parameter, so presumably that would have to contain a code for the REBOL refinement | |
It's not clear how you could use that to implement complex refinements such as /output | |
Maxim 17-Dec-2009 [3392x2] | its possible Carl left some things for further consideration... we did pressure him into releasing sooner than later. |
call refinements would sit in well with something easily left for later. | |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3394x2] | Well, quite a bit of extra consideration is needed here. There are no error codes returned, either |
Problem with the parameters is that the host interface will change when added later | |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3396x2] | Maxim - you are off once again ... |
Call has nasty bugs, which are in CC for quite some time. It is just general disagreement, on how Call should be implemented. BrianH stated, that it is now more low-level, and I objected, that I don't care, or it is not usefull for most use cases ... | |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3398] | Maxim is right that they are not bugs, but a very primitive implementation |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3399x2] | I am now surprised the implementation differs between the platforms. Call is one of necessary beta quality fixes .... |
ah ... well, how is that it worked with R2? | |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3401] | Carl once said that the C code for R2 CALL is 1200 lines. If he wasn't joking, he has saved 600-fold over that so far |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3402x2] | BrianH is probably right, that because the code is part of host, we can fix it ourselves |
1200 lines? uh :-) | |
Maxim 17-Dec-2009 [3404] | it had some quirks and evolved at almost every iteration of the language. |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3405x2] | Yes, I expect you to start coding now :-) |
Petr, that is | |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3407] | I don't care for coding, I prefer to complain around, until it gets fixed ... |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3408] | We know... |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3409] | Kaj - so stop using the wrong attitude ... you just fit old R2 mental model :-) |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3410x2] | Problem is, it's just complaining. You think it makes things go faster, but it doesn't |
I just analysed R3 code for you. How does that earn me an accusation of R2 mindset? | |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3412] | http://www.rebol.net/wiki/REBOL_adoption#.22You_can_code_it_in_few_lines.22_attitude |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3413] | Well, here's the news: by releasing host code, Carl has just extended that principle to the C code, as well |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3414] | You see? I don't care. I can see it as an repetitive pattern, which is very wrong ... 80% of potential newcomers will NEVER actually care to implement anything themselves. I have seen the attitude with Gabriele, Holger, RT ... I hate it |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3415] | That would be excellent, because 20% of your users contributing would be phenomenal |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3416] | Not everyone can code. But I proposed bounties. I sponsored 500USD for networking protocols ... |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3417] | Word just came out that even the VLC project, one ot the most popular programs ever, doesn't even have any contributors left for the Mac version |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3418x2] | Yes, that is sad (VLC) |
I still think, that Amiga/MorphOS like bounties could be motivating factor for some ppl to pick-up and deliver some stuff for R3. | |
Maxim 17-Dec-2009 [3420] | pekr... one problem today is that people have come to an assumption that software programs itself. I don't know where that is coming from, but in ALL real projects... at some point, you actually do have to raise your sleeves and put a little effort into it. |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3421] | We actually find it uplifting, because it means things aren't as bad as it may seem for Syllable |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3422] | If 10 ppl can spend 50, it might be enough for someone to do fix here or there ... |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3423] | Maxim, it's to blame on the AI mongerers who implanted that thought in the public's mind in the previous century :-) |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3424] | Kaj - but the overall situation of VLC might be a bit different, no? OS-X is kind of multimedia system. It uses iTunes, Quicktime, so maybe it is not problem of VLC community itself, but maybe just on OS-X, there is not enough of users interested in VLC? |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3425x2] | No, every Mac user has VLC installed |
It's just the sad state of human nature | |
Maxim 17-Dec-2009 [3427] | on mac VLC is very usefull... it plays all the stuff Apple doesn't want you to look at ;-) its actually one of the few softwares installed on my mac (I've only had to install 4 so far, 1 being a game I bought) |
Kaj 17-Dec-2009 [3428] | I'm OK with people not contributing, but then they should keep their big mouths shut |
Pekr 17-Dec-2009 [3429] | hmm, then I don't understand it ... |
Maxim 17-Dec-2009 [3430] | The sad state is also that we have this strange and powerfull urge to feed... and working on software for free... is usually done by need, or Academia, cause they can. |
older newer | first last |