World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
ManuM 9-May-2009 [2919] | I don't know ( the two questions ) :) |
Gabriele 12-May-2009 [2920x2] | Robert, afaik file names are utf8 by default on ext filesystems. (actually i think the filesystem does not care much about the encoding, but the os in general uses utf8.) i think you need that option on the ntfs filesystem, not the ext one. |
re: ios, if you have non-ascii chars, it could be a problem. | |
Robert 13-May-2009 [2922x2] | I'm wondering how I got those "invalid UTF-8 characters" onto my EXT3 filesystem. IOS cleans-out filenames that contain special characters, so it should be no problem on the server-side. |
I'm going to try to convert 1 single filename and see what happens. | |
Gabriele 13-May-2009 [2924x2] | most programs do not check that the file name is valid utf-8. normally, you're using a utf-8 terminal so there is no way you can type an invalid filename. but you can easily create one using rebol for eg. or using escape sequences in the shell and so on |
in the same way, you can convert them back as long as you know what the source charset was | |
Robert 13-May-2009 [2926] | Ok thanks. |
Maxim 17-May-2009 [2927x2] | I haven't played with unix for so long I'm a bit (very :-) rusty. when doing an 'ls -al' I get: total 20 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 16 05:37 . drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 May 16 12:10 .. -rw------- 1 root root 437 May 17 09:35 .bash_history -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 412 Dec 15 2004 .bashrc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 140 Nov 19 2007 .profile I can't remember what the "total 20" stands for. it doesn't map to file numbers, block counts used by files, or anything I can gather... is this some type of millisecond count of time it took to perform the file list? |
I used to be an IRIX certified integration expert... working on 1M$ + systems ... this feels strange...I feel like a newbie all over again :-) | |
Dockimbel 17-May-2009 [2929x2] | It matches the number of "o" in double "oo". ;-) |
More seriously, it looks like it's the total number of file system blocks. See there : http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/[fedora-list-:-redhat-:-com]/msg51203.html | |
Maxim 17-May-2009 [2931x2] | ahhh yes using the -h flag does make it explit and clear |
thx for the link | |
Maxim 18-May-2009 [2933x2] | I never really liked linux... (being a fan of "real" unixes which actually do work all the time ;-) and now I am remembering why. |
I got a bare-bones debian install, and am trying to add X11 to it. can any one point me to a real link with explicit instructions? | |
Henrik 18-May-2009 [2935] | apt-get install xserver-xorg might be a good place to start |
Maxim 18-May-2009 [2936x2] | I've tried following instructions from a few sites which show a 3 command line install, but that fails, since it doesn't install x11 , only xwindows, and then it reports its missing about 2% of the files from the distribution server itself. |
yep that fails so far. getting a number of missing packages. | |
Henrik 18-May-2009 [2938] | did you run apt-get update first? |
Maxim 18-May-2009 [2939] | hum.... I seem to remember doing but I was falling asleep on my keyboard by that time... ok so I should de an apt-get update first, and then attempt the xserver-xorg ? |
Henrik 18-May-2009 [2940x2] | the update syncs the repository, so if packages were missing, they should be there now. |
although I find it strange that debians package repository should be that broken. it usually isn't. | |
Maxim 18-May-2009 [2942x2] | the apt-get update did the trick |
thanks :-) I was able to install the whole x11 without complaining. | |
Henrik 18-May-2009 [2944] | neat |
Maxim 18-May-2009 [2945] | there are a few missing files, but so far it at least was able to get to the point where it actually installed the X 11 apps and utilities... not just a few libs |
Henrik 18-May-2009 [2946] | my biggest peeve with it has always been to find that magic package that installs everything you need. |
Maxim 18-May-2009 [2947x2] | retrying to start cheyenne... |
btw all is good, cheyenne/view is working on my server. (in case someone is following the discussion) | |
Henrik 18-May-2009 [2949] | oh, that's nice. do graphics and fonts work? |
Maxim 18-May-2009 [2950x3] | no clue !! I havn't even started putting content yet :-) working on new ssh-admin upload/download/shortcut features and then remark_mod. until remark_mod is working, no content will be visible. forcing myself to implement what I've been wanting to do for years ;-) |
but since one of the initial tags will be liquid-paint integration, in order to build gfx dynamically... I'll soon know :-) | |
this is an exciting time for me... I've been inching my way to this point for almost a decade. building libs and tools one by one with a precise vision in mind. I am now at the point where I can start integrating all of that into "products", and so far there is very little things to change, all the lego bricks fit together :-D | |
btiffin 18-May-2009 [2953] | Go Max Go! |
amacleod 18-May-2009 [2954] | What are we talking about here, Maxim? What will this allow you to do exactly? |
Maxim 18-May-2009 [2955] | you mean the ssh-admin? |
amacleod 18-May-2009 [2956x2] | yes/no...More interested in remark_mod and remark v2 |
how dynamic? | |
Maxim 18-May-2009 [2958] | there is a !remark group.. more details are there, ask remark questions there ;-) |
Maxim 24-May-2009 [2959] | I am sourcing a file with alias commands in them, but they aren't actually being applied. typing those exact commands directly in the shell works. I know alias is not a file command, but a bash internal operation, but how can I get bash to source the files and apply the aliases to my login automatically? the echo within the file IS printing on the shell, so its not just chmod thing... any linux gurus can help me? |
Kaj 24-May-2009 [2960] | Depending on the Linux distro, there are several startup files executed by the shell where you can enter them |
Maxim 24-May-2009 [2961] | in this case, debian. |
Kaj 24-May-2009 [2962] | I currently have mine in my home directory in .bashrc |
Maxim 24-May-2009 [2963] | I usually prefer having separate files for different tasks rather than dumping everything in the main files. |
Kaj 24-May-2009 [2964] | If you're not using BASh it could be .profile |
Maxim 24-May-2009 [2965x2] | maybe the originally sourced files are executed a bit differently. on sgi IRIX I never had any issue with sourcing files into the .cshrc files... I was using tcsh, which I usually prefer over bash, but isn't included by default in all flavors of unix. |
bash tells me it can't find tcsh, so I assume its not loaded on my distro. | |
Kaj 24-May-2009 [2967] | If you want to define them globally, /etc/profile probably works, or maybe /etc/bash.bashrc |
Maxim 24-May-2009 [2968] | I'll defining them in the .bashrc to see if they are set automatically. |
older newer | first last |