World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
Volker 6-Oct-2005 [263] | and they play the ball to altmes/sdk . http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugs/2005-July/069415.html *sigh* |
Kaj 8-Oct-2005 [264] | You have to install the package libxaw6 |
Henrik 9-Oct-2005 [265] | kaj, that seems to work on debian, but not ubuntu |
Kaj 9-Oct-2005 [266x6] | That's strange |
I'm on Ubuntu Hoary here, which is basically Debian, and I'm running View and AltME | |
I have libxaw6, libxaw7 and libxaw8 installed, which are standard Ubuntu packages. libxaw7 is the standard XFree86 library, libxaw6 is the older X11 library, and libxaw8 is a new version of libxaw7 | |
libxaw7 is currently default on most Linux systems. For older REBOL versions like AltME you have to install libxaw7. The new View 1.3, however, is already linked to libxaw7, which makes this a lot easier | |
In the same way, the new View needs a relatively new libstdc++ standard C++ library (part of GCC). On older Linux systems you may have to install this, but on most systems it's already standard, so this should usually not be a problem | |
Henrik, did you install all the dependencies of libxaw6? That error message looks like libxaw6 is installed, but that if can't find something that it needs | |
Volker 9-Oct-2005 [272] | See my links. Henrik has the lib, but a symbol is missing. Another app had same error-message, they say "deprecated, tell vendor". But they say also libxaw8 (unsupported) has it. You have it, maybe Henrik needs it to, even if altme says 6? |
Henrik 9-Oct-2005 [273] | kaj, I'm using Breezy which could be the problem. I remember that I could run AltME just fine on Hoary |
Kaj 9-Oct-2005 [274x2] | Man, I hope I'm not going to loose REBOL with Breezy next week... |
I don't like the trick, but some people made it work by symlinking libxaw6 to libxaw7, without installing libxaw6. If what Volker says is right, it may work if you symlink it to libxaw8 | |
Henrik 10-Oct-2005 [276] | out of curiosity, what does AltME need libxaw6 for when REBOL/View runs fine on its own? |
Gabriele 10-Oct-2005 [277] | older View used it for the security requesters. not sure if this is still the case with 1.3 or not. |
Alan 10-Oct-2005 [278] | just install Mandriva 2006 and then Rebol/Altme. Altme is acting different than the old Mandrake 10.1 install. It's showing all the messages in the All Groups-not the Rebol group etc ? |
Kaj 10-Oct-2005 [279] | 1.3 is linked to libxaw7. Older Views needed libxaw6 just like AltME |
Alan 11-Oct-2005 [280] | with a reboot Mandriva/Altme is working correct now |
Gabriele 11-Oct-2005 [281] | Alan: that happens the first time AltME syncs up. |
Alan 11-Oct-2005 [282] | Gabriele:thanks,been running Altme on XP so long forgot that :) |
Robert 28-Oct-2005 [283] | Ok, I need some advice from you Linux gurus out there: I'm running my xpeers server on an old RH 7.3 installation with EXT3 filesystem. The server is running in a data-center, so only remote access via SSH. 1. Does it make sense to update the kernel / system? If, how can I do this remote? 2. I think with xpeers ReiserFS might be a better choice because I have thousands of small files on my system, that needs to be handled. How can I update the filesystem? |
Gabriele 28-Oct-2005 [284x4] | updating the system does make sense, but it should be done by someone familiar with the issue (if you do something wrong, there's nothing you can do to fix it remotely) |
changing the filesystem is something i would not do remotely. | |
it can be done (with a *lot* of effort), but it's too risky. it's much easier to rent a new server with reiser and move the data. | |
maybe you can do it by adding a new hd to the server. still a non-trivial task though, and i would try it on a local machine at least twice before attempting on a remote machine. :) | |
Joe 28-Oct-2005 [288x3] | robert, I would ask your hosting company if they can give you access to the terminal server (so that you ssh there and then you can reboot and see boot messages as if you were on a local terminal - note you might have to configure the server first |
otherwise you're better off letting them handle the os upgrade or better ask for a up to date box (e.g. with Fedora core 4) and migrate | |
if you have access to the terminal server I can send you info on how to configure it so that you get the boot messages | |
Robert 28-Oct-2005 [291x2] | Ok, thanks for the comments. What's this terminal-server stuff? Is this a special console I connect too? |
The machine is a dedicated one. I'm the only user of it with full-root access rights. | |
Benjamin 29-Oct-2005 [293] | i cant run core042 i get: *** Boot error 951, any ideas of what may be wrong ? |
Joe 30-Oct-2005 [294] | the terminal server is used by the hosting company to access multiple servers consoles without having physical consoles. When they reboot a machine the can get the bios boot messages because there is a console cable to the terminal server and they normally access the terminal server via ssh |
Alan 30-Oct-2005 [295] | ok I am running into a problem running the last stable version on View-I can run as root but not a user ? running from root i have changed the permissions but when I do that,then I can not run a root ? I remember on mandrake 10.1 I was able to run View as a user ? Also,what do I need to install to get the View 1.3 ? running on mandriva 2006 ? Thanks from a Linux newbie |
DideC 8-Nov-2005 [296x2] | Is there any specific need to make View 1.3.50 running under Linux: - It runs right while clicking the icon - it fails to run from a terminal: ./rebol ** User Error: REBOL: Cannot connect to X server ** Near: size-text self |
Is there some environment vars missing ? | |
Pekr 8-Nov-2005 [298x2] | you cant run View in console mode? |
I mean - if your server does not have X-Win installed, then you have to use Core | |
DideC 8-Nov-2005 [300] | (Its not me, but I asked for another guy) An "xhost + localhost" seems to have solved the problem. |
Henrik 22-Nov-2005 [301] | hmm... after upgrading to Ubuntu Dapper, AltME has started working again. |
Kaj 23-Nov-2005 [302] | Thanks for that info! |
Rebolek 23-Nov-2005 [303] | which distro do you recommend to linux newbie (me)? |
Henrik 23-Nov-2005 [304] | Ubuntu is very nice for beginners |
Volker 23-Nov-2005 [305] | Is it very different from knoppix? HAs knoppix stiil the better hardware-detection? Than 1-2weeks knoppix and thenubuntu? |
Henrik 23-Nov-2005 [306] | I can only speak for myself, but Ubuntu installed flawlessly on the PC's I've installed it on. I use Knoppix only as a live CD. |
Kaj 23-Nov-2005 [307] | Knoppix still has better detection, but yes, it's primarily a live CD. I use Ubuntu in most cases, but I use MEPIS instead of Knoppix, which is also very nice and can both be installed and used as a live CD, like Ubuntu |
Volker 23-Nov-2005 [308x2] | AFAIK knoppix is now debian-compatible, means apt-get works without problems. |
But if ubuntu installs without problems, its ok. | |
Rebolek 23-Nov-2005 [310] | I've installed Ubuntu for my girlfriend and it seems to work without problems. My win-comp crashed badly again so I'm thinging about changing my OS. I want to know what alternatives are there, what distro seems to work best. I tried Mepis yesterday but was dissapointed, it had some strange problems. |
Luisc 23-Nov-2005 [311] | easy to use = Xandros, linspire, mepis, pcbsd. I personally use linspire ( the only one that finds all my hardware and it works), mepis is real nice but it won't detect my 4 port lan ( only 2 ports) Xandros crashes with my video card, pcbsd ( freebsd) is very nice but right know it has issues with flat monitors, Oh Oh you can try PClinuxOS it is easy too and with a lot of eye candy. |
Alan 23-Nov-2005 [312] | well my fav is still Mandriva-works out of the door and is the only distro that worked under Vmware.tried both ubuntu |
older newer | first last |