World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
Will 25-Dec-2008 [2559] | I'd like to have rebol on it, I'm still waiting for the gadget to arrive |
Kaj 25-Dec-2008 [2560x2] | It has an XScale CPU. There's no REBOL for ARM Linux |
Probably the most you could do is try to cross-compile ORCA for it | |
Oldes 11-Jan-2009 [2562] | Pekr, you will like it, NVIDIA released new drivers with VDPAU (Video Decode and Presentation API for Unix) http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_ia32_180.22.html Check this benchmark http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=nvidia_vdpau&num=2 |
Pekr 11-Jan-2009 [2563] | Thanks - will look into it ... |
Gabriele 12-Jan-2009 [2564] | does anybody know a video player for linux that supports those apis? (not just nvidia, ati too) |
Oldes 12-Jan-2009 [2565] | Don't know about ATI, but NVIDIA provided the patches http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Njk3MQ |
Graham 21-Jan-2009 [2566x2] | Had a power outage in town, and my red hat server had to be shut down uncleanly since although it was protected by a UPS, the screen wasn't. On rebooting, the raid array had become critical with one of the drives dead. Unfortunately the good drive had developed a corrupted file system as well :( |
Since it was IDE raid ( fasttrack 100 ) I was able to look at the file system using this http://www.fs-driver.orgcool tool that allows you to browse ext2 file systems from windows! | |
Anton 21-Jan-2009 [2568x2] | Lucky it wasn't ext3, hey ? |
(It might have been harder to find an equivalent tool.) | |
Henrik 21-Jan-2009 [2570] | is it possible to downgrade an ext3 disk to ext2? |
BrianH 21-Jan-2009 [2571] | There's a FAQ on the site about Ext3 access. |
Kaj 21-Jan-2009 [2572x2] | Maybe it is ext3, because read-only it behaves like ext2 |
Anyway, if it were ext3, it would probably have repaired itself | |
Gabriele 22-Jan-2009 [2574x2] | ext3 is identical to ex2 except for the journal, so you can access it as ext2 without problems for windows, it just won't update the journal. |
i had a read/write driver installed on windows and used it regularly without problems. | |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [2576x2] | I'm looking for an OSX driver, but there appears to be only an ext2 one, and it will only mount my ext3 drive as read-only. |
which is why I was interested in downgrading it to ext2. | |
Graham 22-Jan-2009 [2578] | I set the driver to read only ... as I didn't want to corrupt the original disk. Now all my files that I extracted are apparently read only ! :( |
Gabriele 22-Jan-2009 [2579x5] | henrik, i think it is possible to disable the journal with tune2fs... let me check... |
tune2fs -O ^has_journal | |
WARNING: do this at your own risk. make sure the FS is clean, without errors etc., and make sure you have backups. | |
i have no idea if this just destroys your FS. | |
(btw, I wonder why the Windows and OSX drivers don't support extr3??) | |
Henrik 22-Jan-2009 [2584x2] | the OSX version is just not developed. the project is dead. |
anyone using ZFS then? I'm tired of being bound to an OS with a file system. | |
Robert 22-Jan-2009 [2586x3] | Same for me. I tried MacDrive for Windows to get access to HFS+ drives. The problem is that XP silently initialized your drive with the result that OSX won't recognize it anymore but the HFS+ structure is still valid. I fixed this, by using iPartition and changed the name of the drive. This results in the GPT being writting new and than the drive was OK. Lucky... |
ZFS: I looked a bit into it. I think it's a very nice FS. OSX has only read support, so not of much value. | |
(yet) | |
BrianH 3-Feb-2009 [2589] | If you were to have one Linux to start testing R3 builds on, which Linux would it be? Carl wants to know. |
[unknown: 5] 3-Feb-2009 [2590] | I would say ubuntu |
BrianH 3-Feb-2009 [2591] | One vote for Ubuntu :) |
[unknown: 5] 3-Feb-2009 [2592] | We need electronic ink as I already know that Tippin is going to vote twice for debian. ;-) |
BrianH 3-Feb-2009 [2593x2] | That's why I asked. It's an informal poll, but not a secret one :) |
I'm not voting, btw - I don't know enough about which Linux is the most popular in the REBOL community, and I use Windows :( | |
Graham 3-Feb-2009 [2595x2] | Ubuntu |
which is Debian based ... | |
yeksoon 3-Feb-2009 [2597] | RedHat. (but Ubuntu will do as well). I would just say go for the one that has the largest community. RedHat as a business is doing well. |
Izkata 3-Feb-2009 [2598] | Another vote for Ubuntu |
Graham 4-Feb-2009 [2599] | Also note that rebdev is running on Ubuntu |
kcollins 4-Feb-2009 [2600x3] | I vote for Debian or Ubuntu |
Debian allows you to start with an ISO image as small as 32 Mb, as seen here: http://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst | |
Although it will download quite a bit more during the installation process. | |
Anton 4-Feb-2009 [2603] | Kubuntu, because it's using KDE. |
sqlab 4-Feb-2009 [2604] | Debian, as many small Live Cds use it as a base |
Pekr 4-Feb-2009 [2605] | I was used to Fedora (hence RedHat), but will now move to Ubuntu Server too. So - Ubuntu on my side ... |
Robert 4-Feb-2009 [2606x2] | Debian |
best way to start small and I use it for all my servers. | |
Graham 4-Feb-2009 [2608] | Isn't Debian and Ubuntu support the same ? |
older newer | first last |