r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Linux] group for linux REBOL users

DanielSz
1-Sep-2007
[1764x6]
Maybe, but Carl is so busy, and I don't think it's a priority for 
him
Exactly.
The nice thing about the Nokia is that it's not a pda, it's something 
really new, and for geeks it's a dream machine, it's just plain linux
Natural choices to program onboard is C or python
But you could try to compile different open source languages on it 
too
If you want linux in your pocket, it's either Sharp Zaurus or now 
the N800
Graham
1-Sep-2007
[1770]
don't you have to import the Zaurus from Japan as well?
DanielSz
1-Sep-2007
[1771x2]
Yes, and it's discontinued as well, so that leaves us with N800 pretty 
much unchallenged
Hook it up with a  bluetooth keyboard and you code as you please 
on the go
Graham
1-Sep-2007
[1773]
well I guess it's wait for the iphone to open up
DanielSz
1-Sep-2007
[1774]
Yeah, but the iphone is more expensive, and the screen is much smaller, 
i've been waiting for something like the N800, but that's me
Gabriele
2-Sep-2007
[1775]
the problem is the processor, otherwise core would run fine i guess. 
not that easy for view though, i think maemo doesn't use X, you need 
to use the GTK.
DanielSz
2-Sep-2007
[1776x2]
I'd be very happy with core to begin with :)
True, some people are complaining the device is uderpowered. Flash 
video will not play smoothly in fullscreen, apparently. I don't know 
if the comparison is valid, but the chip is a 330 MhZ ARM while that 
one of the five years old (?) Palm T3 was a 440MHZ ARM processor.
Kaj
3-Sep-2007
[1778]
Maemo does use X11, but it's otherwise all stripped down. LibXAW 
is in there, too, so REBOL2 wouldn't be hard to port, either
Gabriele
3-Sep-2007
[1779]
when i checked their docs a year ago or so, they did only mention 
GTK in their porting guide. if they run X, then I agree, View should 
be easy to port.
DanielSz
4-Sep-2007
[1780]
Has anyone a syntax file handy for use in gedit, the default text 
editor in gnome?
TomBon
6-Sep-2007
[1781]
was looking also but didn't find one.
try this nice editor instead: http://www.scintilla.org/
syntax file & function folding included.
also available via paketmanager -> scite
DanielSz
6-Sep-2007
[1782]
Will try it out. Thanks for the tip, TomBon.
Kaj
6-Sep-2007
[1783]
GTK almost always runs on X. Ports to other graphics systems are 
incomplete and outdated
DanielSz
9-Sep-2007
[1784x2]
On my ubuntu setup, when I click on a rebol file in nautilus, I get 
the following:
The filename "syncro.r" indicates that this file is of type "r document". 
The contents of the file indicate that the file is of type "plain 
text document". If you open this file, the file might present a security 
risk to your system.


Do not open the file unless you created the file yourself, or received 
the file from a trusted source. To open the file, rename the file 
to the correct extension for "plain text document", then open the 
file normally. Alternatively, use the Open With menu to choose a 
specific application for the file.
Henrik
9-Sep-2007
[1786]
rebol files are not recognized by default. you need to assign rebol 
to .r files if that is possible.
DanielSz
9-Sep-2007
[1787x2]
info
sorry, you mean edit the mime type configuration file in gnome?
Henrik
9-Sep-2007
[1789x2]
I usually don't launch script from nautilus, but you can make a shebang 
line in the first line of the script to launch it. This way, it should 
work no matter what desktop or command line you use in Linux.
http://rebol.com/docs/core23/rebolcore-2.html#section-2.2<-- shebang 
line
DanielSz
9-Sep-2007
[1791x3]
Yes, I'm using the shebang line, i can run rebol scripts from the 
shell by typing the name: ./syncro.r
But If I click on the icon in nautilus (gnome), then I get this error 
message, although it occured only recently and for the life of me 
I can't remember what I changed
I remember that some time ago, if I would double click on the icon 
I would get a prompt wih the following options: "Run in Terminal", 
"Display", "Run". that's  what I'd like to see again
btiffin
9-Sep-2007
[1794]
DanielSz;  Depending on how many specific associations you have created... 
temporarily moving (ie backup) the  ~/.nautilus subdir may help. 
It holds a metadata subdir.  Which if you move .nautilus Nautilius 
will revert to defaults.  


Or check out these intstructions on update-mime-types.  It effects 
~/.local/share/mime/packages/Override.xml
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/6795
btiffin
13-Sep-2007
[1795]
Just installed a new favourite thing.   unclutter for X.  hides the 
mouse cursor when there is no activity; typing is SOOO much better 
now.   Over the span of my lifetime, I'll probably get at least a 
few days out of each wrist before hardcore cts sets in.  Lovin' it. 
 No more venting about a Mac only feature.  Yippee.
DanielSz
13-Sep-2007
[1796x2]
Thanks for putting me on the right track, btiffin
I'm looking to replace my mailer (The Bat! on windows) to a linux 
solution for ubuntu. what would you guys recommend? Claws? Evolution? 
Sunbird? Or something like mutt or pine? Or even some emacs solution? 
What do you think?
btiffin
13-Sep-2007
[1798]
I use IceApe; Debian's SeaMonkey.  email, browser, chat, calendar 
app (I never use the composer, have Quanta for that)  Because it's 
a be everything suite it's not the best at anything, but it's functional 
for me.
Gabriele
13-Sep-2007
[1799]
i don't think there's anything close to the bat. you might try running 
it with wine. personally, i moved to gmail because of the amount 
of spam i get, i expected to miss the bat a lot, but actually i don't 
use email that much anymore, so i'm fine.
DanielSz
13-Sep-2007
[1800x2]
To help do the transition, I wrote a rebol script that converts a 
native The Bat! mail database to a directory tree structure mirroring 
the contents in the open Berkeley format,  mbox, as found in the 
Unix world.
Anyone interested in the code, just drop me a line.
Henrik
13-Sep-2007
[1802]
how about putting it on rebol.org?
DanielSz
13-Sep-2007
[1803x2]
Sure, but I have lots of excuses to postpone. First, I forgot my 
password for the library script. Second, before posting to rebol.org 
I have to write proper headers in the script (such as date, version 
number, license). Third, I have no idea if there is interest at all. 
But I got your point, which is legit.
Ok, I recovered my password for the library script. That's one excuse 
less.
Robert
15-Sep-2007
[1805]
Isn't Opera available for Linux? I use it on Win for mails. Works 
great.
Kaj
15-Sep-2007
[1806]
It is
DanielSz
16-Sep-2007
[1807x3]
Opera is my browser of choice on all platforms. I never used it for 
mail, though.Thanks for reminding me.
I must say I was pleasantly surprised with the evolution suite. It 
does sync with the palm, and the mailer itself is nice, searching 
is very quick even within large mail databases.
I tested Claws, which is nice, but searching is not fully featured. 
You have yo extend it with a third-party indexer if you want good 
performance.
Kaj
7-Oct-2007
[1810]
http://ml2mst.googlepages.com/thegospeloftux
DanielSz
9-Oct-2007
[1811x3]
After a month of Evolution, I can say I'm not totally satisfied. 
It has some shortcomings both in the UI and in functionality.
I use fetchmail to retrieve the mail and postfix to deliver it, so 
I can experiment at my heart content.
Looks like Claws is the contender after all