World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
yeksoon 20-Jan-2005 [12] | just found out that mod_gzip, mod_gunzip, mod_bunzip2 (any of this) is not a default module with RHEL . I would have thought that this will be a useful module for any server to have. |
Kaj 19-Mar-2005 [13] | Just installed Ubuntu Linux for the first time. REBOL/View's font rendering is correct on it. I hope that will still be the case with the new version that will be released in a month |
Henrik 19-Mar-2005 [14] | I'm sitting on a debian and Ubuntu box here. Fonts are a tad larger in Ubuntu than in debian. debian runs XFree86 and Ubuntu, I believe uses X.org. |
BrianW 19-Mar-2005 [15] | View is pretty happy under Fedora Core 3 |
Henrik 19-Mar-2005 [16] | I do get an error with Core where it stops responding after loading in a terminal. No prompt or error appears. This doesn't happen with View. |
Kaj 19-Mar-2005 [17] | Ubuntu still has XFree, but I think the next version will move to Xorg, hence my concern |
Henrik 19-Mar-2005 [18x2] | I run hoary on two Ubuntu machines. no problems except the font size |
and they are both X.org | |
Kaj 19-Mar-2005 [20x2] | Hoary preview? |
I installed Warty. Is the font size in /View a problem on Hoary? | |
Henrik 19-Mar-2005 [22x3] | well, it's the latest update. just switched out warty with hoary in the sources.list and so I run Hoary :-) I think I need to check the DPI on both machines. I don't have any warty machines. |
ok, it's a bit funny, because some fonts are bigger, such as in the chat area, but headlines are smaller. | |
It could be related to which fonts are installed | |
Kaj 19-Mar-2005 [25] | But not garbled? |
Henrik 19-Mar-2005 [26] | no garbling at all. just slightly different font sizes. |
Kaj 19-Mar-2005 [27] | OK, thanks. Most Debian-derived distros don't trigger the font bug |
Henrik 19-Mar-2005 [28] | http://hmkdesign.dk/debian.pngand http://hmkdesign.dk/ubuntu.png |
Kaj 19-Mar-2005 [29] | :-) |
Henrik 19-Mar-2005 [30x2] | ok, DPI setting for the ubuntu box is 96 DPI. maybe AltME has an "anti-garbling" feature of headlines by turning down the font size while everything else is bigger |
debian is 72 DPI | |
Kaj 19-Mar-2005 [32x2] | The Ubuntu one is more readable, actually |
I'm going to use Hoary to finally switch from Windows | |
Henrik 19-Mar-2005 [34x2] | I'm a bit surprised at how far ahead Hoary is compared to debian unstable |
my debian runs gnome 2.8.2 from experimental, but ubuntu runs 2.10 and it's a lot more stable. | |
Kaj 19-Mar-2005 [36x2] | Yes, they're doing much better release management |
I had a number of problems with Warty, but it's just the first release, and it still compares favorably with the alternatives | |
Henrik 19-Mar-2005 [38x2] | hoary is pretty good. I had a single problem detecting two network cards in my laptop when I first tried it, but I got it running. |
does Warty have the system update tool? Its pretty cool. | |
Kaj 20-Mar-2005 [40] | No, Warty doesn't have it yet. Yes, there are nice improvements in Hoary, but I couldn't use the preview yet. I did add a number of repositories and applications, so I got halfway towards Hoary after all |
Volker 20-Mar-2005 [41] | Maybe its related, on suse 9.0 i change in xf86config FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled" to FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:scaled" Else /view finds only a few matching font-sizes. |
Kaj 20-Mar-2005 [42] | Does that fix garbled fonts? |
Volker 20-Mar-2005 [43] | No, font-size-problems. before the default was to large, and some things like h1 did not work. |
[unknown: 10] 30-Mar-2005 [44x2] | http://thinstation.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/ThIndex |
I think Rebol/services can beat that ! | |
[unknown: 10] 31-Mar-2005 [46] | http://www.goosee.com/puppy/ |
Kaj 31-Mar-2005 [47] | Yes, that's a good one. An annoying thing, though, is that it doesn't seem capable of changing the refresh rate from a flicker |
Robert 4-Jun-2005 [48x3] | Ok, here is a thing I want to use /Core for, which IMO is useful to a lot of people: Locking out IPs after multiple failed sshd login attempts |
I'm not a Linux guru. There are some solutions using a tool named SWATCH but it's not that easy. | |
So what's needed: 1. We need a way to continually parse the SSHD log-file, something like tial 2. We extract the IP address and add it to some firewall, to block it for some time 3. We need to remove the IP from the firewall Anyone interested in such a project? | |
Volker 4-Jun-2005 [51x2] | Did you read here? same wording :) http://www.plug.org/pipermail/plug/2004-October/011457.html |
do we have skip on files now? | |
Robert 4-Jun-2005 [53x2] | Yes, I read this. swatch is working but getting everything tied together is as always with Unix akward. I just want a simple Rebol solution :-)) |
iptables: Is this a tool that I need to start or is it a system tool to alter internal things uses by the kernel anway? | |
Volker 4-Jun-2005 [55x4] | its in that thread: /etc/hosts.deny . juast add ips to block there. |
has a partner /etc/hosts.allow . IIRC .deny has priority. | |
http://www.linuxfibel.de/nettest.htm(german) | |
should then be lines like ALL: 123.234.345.456 but better wait for our real linux-pros. | |
Robert 4-Jun-2005 [59x2] | When is this file re-read? I mean if we append something, how to activate it. |
What happens if the same IP tries again? The request is blocked immediatly? Why might using a firewall or iptables be better? | |
Volker 4-Jun-2005 [61] | good questions. don't know. |
older newer | first last |