World: r3wp
[Syllable] The free desktop and server operating system family
older newer | first last |
Kaj 29-Jun-2007 [958x3] | We ported WebKit, Apple's web rendering engine, to Syllable to build a new browser. Our old browser was based on KHTML, the open source engine that Apple forked to develop into WebKit |
Since the publication, Apple has already come to our mailing list to ask us to join their WebKit project | |
The second announcement is that we are introducing a server companion to our Syllable desktop system. Syllable Server is based on the Linux kernel, but otherwise as much like Syllable as possible | |
Graham 29-Jun-2007 [961] | I think it should be not "compliments Syllable on the desktop." but "complements" |
Kaj 29-Jun-2007 [962] | I know. Anything else to mention on us creating a new operating system and a new browser? |
Graham 29-Jun-2007 [963x2] | well, that's nice .. but I was hoping for a Rebol announcement :( |
But if it means I can get a server environment that runs vmware without endless issues ... then it's great news!! | |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [965x4] | REBOL/Core is included in the Linux. Since it's a Linux, it didn't have to be ported |
I didn't want to make that part of the announcements yet, to give people time to digest the idea of our use of Linux. That's plenty controversial already :-) | |
The next step would be porting /View to our graphical toolkit, and that's where REBOL 3 will come in | |
We haven't worked on VMWare yet, but someone will integrate it someday | |
Graham 30-Jun-2007 [969] | I guess we're not in the loop so didn't realise that the use of linux was going to be contraversial. |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [970x3] | The whole base of our project is doing things better than other systems. That's Linux in the first place, because we're using the same open-source parts. So we always get a lot of criticism from Linux fanboys for even trying. They're at least as good in FUD as they say Microsoft is towards Linux |
Now we're going to get the heat from people who believe in our project - or say they did - for incorporating the Linux kernel | |
But this is still between free software fans. Once we announce that we are going to ship closed, proprietary REBOL in the base distribution, we will get into a whole other fight about violating open-source purity | |
ICarii 30-Jun-2007 [973] | isnt purity grand ;) |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [974] | Yeah |
ICarii 30-Jun-2007 [975] | heres hoping BeOS/Haiku wont have the same issue :( |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [976x2] | Our purity is our focus on technical excellence, but that's almost impossible to explain in today's world |
Haiku is BSD-licensed, so that's yet another scene | |
ICarii 30-Jun-2007 [978x2] | Syllable was originally an Atheos fork want it after teh other guy stopped writing it? |
excuse my terrible typing :( | |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [980] | Correct |
Pekr 30-Jun-2007 [981] | what is the purpose of server edition? |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [982] | To be a server :-) |
Pekr 30-Jun-2007 [983] | I don't understand its architecture - is it linux kernel with Syllable API? |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [984] | Yes, basically |
Pekr 30-Jun-2007 [985] | And - will you switch to linux kernel also for desktop edition too? |
ICarii 30-Jun-2007 [986] | is there a danger that it will cannibalize your syllable desktop setups? |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [987] | No, that's why we call it Syllable Server |
ICarii 30-Jun-2007 [988] | but wouldnt a syllable server user have the best of both worlds? |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [989x2] | The cannibalization issue is real, but we are facing it with full conscience. It's strategic. We have failed to attract application developers so far, so by putting our APIs on top of Linux we should finally convince them |
People will write for the Linux, but the apps will run on Desktop as well, so it's a win | |
Pekr 30-Jun-2007 [991] | that' a good plan |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [992x2] | Desktop will still be superior for desktop use. Our founder didn't create our kernel for nothing |
Thanks | |
ICarii 30-Jun-2007 [994] | does syllable use a kit system like beos did? |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [995] | Yes, same model, with minor variations |
ICarii 30-Jun-2007 [996] | nice - i really liked that about beos |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [997] | Another interesting effect is that we can now show very precisely how parts of Linux compare to ours |
Pekr 30-Jun-2007 [998] | kit system? |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [999] | It's a semi-microkernel approach |
Pekr 30-Jun-2007 [1000] | btw - is there any plan for R3 clone? Most open source parts will be usable, API seems to be defined, so maybe cloning effort is easier now? Or don't you mind using 3rd party binary packages? |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [1001x3] | We have a modular monolithic kernel, not a real microkernel. But still, most functionality runs in userspace servers. BeOS groups them and calls each a kit |
Cloning R3 is pretty much beyond our reach. We only have time to integrate existing parts | |
So the strategy is to use ORCA for simple system parts, to keep the base system open source | |
Pekr 30-Jun-2007 [1004] | but Orca will soon become absolutly forgotten imo, as R3 introduces lots of new things to REBOL. I think it will soon become irrelevant product .... |
Kaj 30-Jun-2007 [1005x2] | R3 will be extra functionally, but its openness should help appeace open-source people |
ORCA is not irrelevant. It's an essential system part of both Syllable Server and Syllable Desktop | |
Pekr 30-Jun-2007 [1007] | I know that it is important for you, but I fear it will die, once R3 is out, due to incompatibilities? Is ORCA still being developed? |
older newer | first last |