World: r3wp
[I'm new] Ask any question, and a helpful person will try to answer.
older newer | first last |
Henrik 30-Jun-2006 [359] | load is pretty good for checking valid content |
Normand 12-Jul-2006 [360] | Multiple refinement functions : I need to formulate a function with more than one refinement. I know in Rebol we usually use the word 'either to formulate them, but with more than 3 refinements (and its following default case) it becomes tedious. Structures like 'record-operations: func [/delit /addit /modit] [ either delit [print "delete"] [either addit [print "add"] [either modit [print "modify"][print "no refinement"]]]]' are overly complicated. I would like a more flat structure, to be able to distinguish the conditions which are independants from the ones mutually dependants, albeit mutually exclusive. I tried multiple if's but that does not seem to work. What are the good options to code multiple refinements functions. The mail list does not seem to have an example discussing just that. And in the source, most functions with multiple refinements are native. |
Sunanda 12-Jul-2006 [361] | Multiple ifs should work.... if addit [addit code termined with a return] if modit [ modit code terminated with a return] If you have multiple refinements that make up one logical unit, try something like this: f: func [/a /b /c /d] [if all [a b c] [print 'abc return true] print 'not-triggered] f/a not-triggered f/b/c/a abc true |
Geomol 12-Jul-2006 [362] | If you allow more than one refinement at a time, an approach is to build up the code in a block, depending on the refinements (using if), and then evaluate the block at the end of the function. Example: f: func [/a /b /c] [blk: copy [] if a [append blk [print "ref a active"]] if b [append blk [print "ref b active"]] if c [append blk [print "ref c active"]] do blk] >> f/c/a ref a active ref c active |
Anton 12-Jul-2006 [363] | How about this ? f: func [/aref /bref /cref /local refs symbs][ refs: copy [aref bref cref] symbs: copy [] forall refs [if get refs/1 [append symbs to-char #"a" - 1 + index? refs]] ; convert to #"a" #"b" #"c" ... switch rejoin symbs [ "abc" [print "All of them"] "ac" [print "Just A and C"] "b" [print "Just B"] ] ] |
Normand 12-Jul-2006 [364] | Thanks for those answers. |
Anton 13-Jul-2006 [365] | Using an issue (or could be a string) instead of a block: f: func [/aref /bref /cref /local refs symbs][ refs: copy [aref bref cref] symbs: copy # forall refs [if get refs/1 [append symbs to-char #"a" - 1 + index? refs]] ; convert to #"a" #"b" #"c" ... switch symbs [ #abc [print "All of them"] #ac [print "Just A and C"] #b [print "Just B"] ] ] |
Ingo 13-Jul-2006 [366] | Newer version also have case ... case [ aref [ print 'aref] bref [print 'bref] true [print 'default] ] |
Maxim 13-Jul-2006 [367x5] | normand, a lot of us forget about the two following words: ANY ALL |
they are extremely powerfull when used together in cascade, and allow you to bake many ifs and eithers into one line of code: ANY stops evaluating an expression while it encounters none! values, ALL stops evaluating at the first none! value it encounters. | |
here is an example for handling multiple non-exlusive switches: lets say you have refinements /a /b /c /d. /d is mutually-exlusive to all others and a + b reacts differently than when alone... trying to wrap that in if/either can be a nightmare, and its impossible using case or switch... BUT using any/all actually makes it quite visual and simple to see flow: | |
option: ANY [ ALL [d (print "Exclusive d submitted") 1] ALL [a b (print "A and B supplied together") 2] ALL [a (print "A alone") 3] ALL [b (print "B alone") 4] 0 ] if d [print "D also specified" option: option + 10] | |
here, the first occurence of any possible refinement combination returns a number, the trailing 0 is there so that ANY does not return none (which could also be what you want) the /d is checked a part since its not exclusive. | |
Normand 14-Jul-2006 [372] | Glad to see that in Rebol there are many ways to Rome. Alphabetical sort - Is there a built-in way to obtain the right sort order for the french language. a b c d e é è ë f g ... I dont see it as a 'sort refinement, and 'am a bit surprised. Else why fuss with 8 bit chars? So I suppose it is there, but don't see it. In plain sort, the accented caracters are coming last! a: [é è ê ë a c b d e g f h i k j l m n p o q r t s u v x w y z] sort a == [a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z è é ê ë] |
Volker 14-Jul-2006 [373x2] | Sort sorts only by ascii, the other things you need to compare yourself. |
Else why fuss with 8 bit chars - erm, to display such chars, for example in altme? | |
Sunanda 15-Jul-2006 [375] | Sorting.....Check this thread. It contains worked solutions for correct sorting in Hungarian. French should be similar: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/ml-display-thread.r?m=rmlMWWJ |
Anton 15-Jul-2006 [376] | Surely French rebolers have dealt with sorting... Have you checked rebolfrance ? |
Normand 16-Jul-2006 [377] | Ill do. Thanks. |
BenK 18-Jul-2006 [378] | HNewbie here and considering purchasing View/Pro. Not rich so I was wondering, will I have to pay again when Rebol3 comes out? |
Gabriele 19-Jul-2006 [379] | licensing for R3 hasn't been discussed at all so far. you should probably ask your question to cindy at rebol dot com. |
Pekr 19-Jul-2006 [380x2] | isn't it preliminary to talk about licensing of R3, when even alpha was not posted? :-) |
(so we don't know much about architecture, I mean - e.g. language extensibility via plug-ins ..) | |
BenK 19-Jul-2006 [382] | I'll ask Cindy: only thing I wish to know is if DLL access is not free in R3 if there will be a (cheap) upgrade path for R2 licensees. |
james_nak 19-Jul-2006 [383] | BenK, I waited a real long time to purchase Pro/sdk but glad I did as I had a project come up that required binding my app into a simple to use .exe. |
BenK 19-Jul-2006 [384] | Well, I have no such requirements, no commercialisation of anything I write (it's just for my own and my family's use) so there's no way I can justify coughing up much money; just looking for the bare minimum I can get away with |
Henrik 19-Jul-2006 [385] | good question on the licensing. I'm also about to buy the SDK and it would be nice to know how much it's going to be worth until a 3.0 SDK comes out. |
BenK 19-Jul-2006 [386] | If Cindy answers, I'll pass it on here... |
BenK 24-Jul-2006 [387] | For thos einterested: just received e-mail from Cindy stating that there will be a (cheaper) upgrade path to R3 for R2 licensees, butno details available just yet. |
xavier 13-Jan-2007 [388] | . |
RayA 31-May-2007 [389] | G'day, |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [390] | hi :-) |
RayA 31-May-2007 [391] | I'm new to REBOL (discovered it by accident searching for internet operating systems) and was pleasantly surprised to discover this powerful language/environment with an active/passionate community. I'm not a programming guru, but would like to understand the language/environment and the types of applications it is good for (and not good for). So would anybody be able to point me to the "idiot's guide to REBOL"? Does REBOL provide architecture documentation/guidelines and/or frameworks for the development of scalable, fault tolerant, manageable, with hot code swapping for soft real-time 24x7 applications? Thank you in advance for your recommendations. |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [392x5] | heh, huh, tought questions :-) |
Well, you joined our community in the correct time, for us we are close, actually very close to change REBOL millenium. 1.June there will be REBOL 3 released to selected developers. REBOL 3 is BIG change in architecture, for the good of course! | |
We will get things like threading, most of the stuff is going to be open-sourced, we will be able to extend rebol by own components, modules will be available too, and many other changes. | |
For things that do exist: Resources: - http://www.rebol.com- corporate site, you will find docs linked there - http://www.rebol.net- developer's central. Sadly site was much more rich, but there was a server crash some time ago. But - still valuable rources - test releases, Carl's blogs, RAMBO bug database etc. | |
ah, and I forgot - http://www.rebol.org- script archive, mail list archive | |
RayA 31-May-2007 [397] | Good, I guess I can go straight to REBOL 3! Will there be documentation, tutorials, architectues, etc. etc? |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [398x4] | yes, of course, there should be. Part of the project is - DevBase, DocBase. DocBase is going to be based upon MediaWiki. I suggest you to install latest View release and then run Carl's DevCon slides. DevCon was held in Paris few weeks ago. Videos should be available shortly. |
http://www.rebol.com/notes/devcon07-carl.zip | |
R3 should be released to public July 15. Of course there will be some bugs to sort out, some things to finish, etc. In the meantime, you can study some docs - most things will stay valid. It is not change in philosophy, whole architecture will just get much stronger. | |
Now for some frameworks: | |
RayA 31-May-2007 [402] | Thank you for the links! I briefly saw some of the information, but not being a guru, I'm really looking for the "idiot's guide to REBOL" that gently introduces the reader to the power of REBOL through simple examples so I/others can "think deifferently" about programming and undo all the years of bad habits from other languages. |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [403x2] | We have XML-RPC for intercommunication, my guess is - not used much, but fine when you want to connect to server, which does use it. Rugby - RPC broker. VERY easy to use, you would be surprised! You simply start server, you define which functions you expose, something like server [my-func1 my-func2] and then you just connect. It uses functions stubs, so actually your source code is not revealed to client. |
REBOL/services - architecture developed by RT themselves, which will be part of every REBOL release, to standardise. You can find it via rebol.net IIRC. There are some docs, examples. It is not fully finished, it does not work if you are behind the proxy, and is not properly async, hence ppl work for R3 (which is async by default). Very strong concept, and once R3 is out, we will ruin other languages world via simplicity. You should also learn more about dialects, what they are, how those could be used, etc. | |
RayA 31-May-2007 [405] | I live in the East Bay of Northern California, and I'd be interested to meet REBOL developers/users in the area, if anybody is interested. Also, out of curiosity, where are the active developers located? |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [406x3] | Uniserve - multiplexing engine, kind of Medusa (Python). Uniserve engine is used for Cheyenne web server (look for that group here), and it is kind of cool web server, faster than Apache 1, fully REBOL based (well, who said scripting languages are slow? ;-), you don't need to install anything. It allows you to plug/unplug services when server is running! |
active developers? Here on AltME plus ML ... we are small community, but you mostly get your response/help in minutes/hours .... | |
also - in Rebol/View, start desktop and go to rebol.com site to see some tools, demos. Right clicking them you can get to its source code ... | |
older newer | first last |