World: r3wp
[I'm new] Ask any question, and a helpful person will try to answer.
older newer | first last |
Steeve 22-May-2009 [2812] | Sorry it's not what i mean. |
mhinson 22-May-2009 [2813] | Well, I dont want to cause an anoyance with too much noise |
Steeve 22-May-2009 [2814] | you're really wellcome here to post questions |
mhinson 22-May-2009 [2815] | Thankyou very much. I really value the help I have recieved for you all. |
Steeve 22-May-2009 [2816] | But with the time, you'll see some strange reactions like mine. Some of your questions will be not well considered if they not reflect your current level. Your current status is not anymore "i'm a newbie", be aware of that fact. |
Brock 22-May-2009 [2817x5] | Steeve, I've been holding off in saying this but you have been pretty rude to a few people here over the past couple of months with some people. Because you are such an expert, you are putting others down for both their efforts and questions. |
The one thing that Rebol has that is somewhat unique, is a nice community, with varied talents, interests and programming experience both with Rebol and other languages. I feel your sharp answers can be detrimental to those lurking, and push people away, such as myself and mhinson. Your tolerance would be appreciated. | |
Sorry, but I had to say it. | |
Everyone appreciates getting a response to a question. The fact that this is a group called I'm New, you should maybe consider ignoring it if you don't want to answer questions that are repetitive or simple [to you]. | |
... and that's all I will say on the topic. | |
Graham 22-May-2009 [2822] | Brock, I think it has to be pointed out that one also needs to ask appropriate questions. |
Brock 22-May-2009 [2823] | It's a group labeled I'm New... that pretty much says it all. |
Maxim 22-May-2009 [2824x2] | I think that mhinson still feels that he is new. cause he realises that he is still struggling with simple things. |
people usually stop asking basic questions when they don't need to. some people learn quick, some learn slow, some have a lot of catching up to do.. there are many reasons for someone not to *get* rebol from the bat. | |
Brock 22-May-2009 [2826] | I've been programming (scripting) with Rebol for many years, on a casual basis, and I can't answer mhinson's question without sitting down and looking at it and fumbling through some of this. |
mhinson 22-May-2009 [2827] | It would be good if there were enough newbies to form their own huddle & ask each other the questions that the more experienced people find tedious to answer. It takes me a good while to work out very basic things, even if I have an overview of more complex areas. I have been learning Rebol for 2 months, it is the first serious attempt I have made at this sort of thing for over 20 years. |
Maxim 22-May-2009 [2828] | some people can't learn from documents... I know I can't. reading reference documents doesn't give you the why or the other inside knowledge... the *better* way whcih is directly applied to a problem. |
Brock 22-May-2009 [2829] | My problem is I jump in for a few weeks, then jump out for a month or two. I never get past the previous level and don't stretch the boundaries or delve into new areas. I will always be a newbie. |
BrianH 22-May-2009 [2830] | Everyone is new sometimes, even when they have been around for years :) |
Maxim 22-May-2009 [2831] | some might say I'm a guru, but yet I still do newbie error in REBOL sometimes... its a very "dig your own grave" kind of language. |
Paul 22-May-2009 [2832] | I'm sure Steeve means well. |
BrianH 22-May-2009 [2833] | I make newbie errors every once in a while too, and there are some areas where I am a newbie full time (like GUI and networking). |
Maxim 22-May-2009 [2834] | this group is for basic questions. or for people who feel they are asking basic questions. |
Brock 22-May-2009 [2835] | I'm sure he does to. He's been very helpful for some people, including mhinson. It's just a matter of being a little more tolerable when he doesn't agree with something. |
BrianH 22-May-2009 [2836] | It's always interesting to see what people think is basic :) |
mhinson 22-May-2009 [2837] | The level of help on this group is spectacular. I think I have picked up a great deal, paticularly about parsing, but I know I still have a lot to learn about passing data types, which might seem more basic. |
Maxim 22-May-2009 [2838x2] | when mhinson won't feel like a newbie, he will start answering questions naturally, like we all do... this is what is so great about the community... everyone gets the help he needs and feels like he ows something back a bit. |
its my POV in any case. | |
Paul 22-May-2009 [2840] | I understand Brock's view here. I wouldn't want to see this community break down and become what you find on USENET or IRC. |
BrianH 22-May-2009 [2841] | Feeling like I owed something back is why I started helping write REBOL, at least the mezzanines :) |
Steeve 22-May-2009 [2842] | Well, have someone answered to the mhinson's question ? What is the worst ? - Having some doubts, even rude words (meaning i want to know you) - Or apathy (do what you want, i don't care) |
BrianH 22-May-2009 [2843x5] | att: func ['paf [path!]] [any [attempt [do paf] ""]] |
The worst is complaining aboput the asking of the question. The best is answering or trying to answer. | |
Apathy is fine, as long as you keep it to yourself. | |
>> a: context [b: 1] >> a/b == 1 >> 'a/b == a/b >> do 'a/b == 1 >> att: func ['paf [path!]] [any [attempt [do paf] ""]] >> att a/b == 1 >> att a/c == "" | |
Now the lit-word! argument 'paf is a little advanced - it means don't evaluate the actual argument. The alternative is this: >> att: func [paf [path!]] [any [attempt [do paf] ""]] >> att 'a/b == 1 | |
Steeve 22-May-2009 [2848] | It's not the meaning of apathy here (check the context) |
BrianH 22-May-2009 [2849x4] | In this case, you have to pass a lit-path! as the actual argument. When the lit-path! 'a/b is evaluated, it converts to the path! a/b |
(Temporarily going off-topic) Answering mhinson's question or asking some of your own is ontopic here. Telling someone to not ask questions is offtopic - see the group description. | |
Some of us like to answer questions, and learn by doing so. This group is like a REBOL-specific version of the Puzzles group :) | |
For instance, I wasn't sure that do path trick would work until I tried it. | |
Steeve 22-May-2009 [2853] | Brian it was not my words. I never said to not respond (strange it's not your habit to perform false denouncements) And i gave a Hint. Anyone else could have completed it at this time. But it seems some of you guys ,like to bash for nothing using false reasons. And that , it's certainly more offtopic than anyting else. |
Graham 22-May-2009 [2854x4] | Everyone has their own way of helping ... |
Let's not bash anyone please .... | |
Steeve just says .. "RTFM" hahah | |
ooops ... didn't mean to say that. | |
Steeve 22-May-2009 [2858x2] | But i gave the index lit-word! in TFM, so it was not so mean. And i gave him my reasons. |
lit-path! , i mean | |
Gregg 23-May-2009 [2860x2] | Mike, by all means keep asking questions here, this is absolutely the right place to do so. Conversing in plain text can be tough, and the rate at which people can respond here--as opposed to email--can contribute to misundertandings, with posts coming fast and furious. And we all interact in slightly different ways. |
Clean slate. | |
older newer | first last |