World: r3wp
[I'm new] Ask any question, and a helpful person will try to answer.
older newer | first last |
SteveT 2-Feb-2008 [1308] | Thanks Henrik, so VID 3 will expect us to prepare our components or have some already prepared that we can then use - a bit like creating a'skin'. This is much better than 'hacking' each button or box in the middle of your layout. Eg, On my main menu example I could have my 'reflected image button' already pre-defined in my stylize section? Would you like me to post your clarification on my blog? |
Pekr 2-Feb-2008 [1309] | Steve - but even with VID2 you could pre-construct your styles by 'stylize and instantiate it by directing VID to your style, or you could stylize it even inline within VID, so that you don't need to override specific parts of your button each time ... |
SteveT 2-Feb-2008 [1310] | Hi Pekr, I understand that, in Visual Studio I would create my own 'custom' controls for various lookups or effect - that can be re-used through-out. If I am planning a full-blown application I would create the same tools. As I read thru the VID User Guide - I'm just playing with one-liners etc. |
Pekr 2-Feb-2008 [1311] | yes. I can't wait how VID3 turns out in that regard :-) We should get more interactivity out-of-the-box. |
SteveT 2-Feb-2008 [1312] | Yep, the development of VID 3 seems right on track IMO, they (RT) don't seem to be falling into the trap of making the program design too event-driven (Like - Visual Studio etc) Although I've used it for years! I think the event-driven design process is bad. You can very easily 'knock-up' an application user interface and it will look very pretty - but then you spend twice the time getting the 'back-end' of the application to work with the front-end!! |
Pekr 2-Feb-2008 [1313] | I wonder if anyone tried looking into Qt? Seems rather complete. KDE 4 uses it. And now Nokia owns it ... |
SteveT 2-Feb-2008 [1314] | Is that the gui they did for tckl ?? |
Pekr 2-Feb-2008 [1315] | I think not. Qt is fro Trolltech, imo pretty advanced. They have also Qtopia version for mobile devices. However - for most simple apps View will be just fine ... and small :-) |
SteveT 2-Feb-2008 [1316x2] | definitely ;-) |
I think VID 3 will be useful for an app I will be doing later this year where I want to offer access to data in a consistant interface for desktop, web and windows mobile. | |
Pekr 2-Feb-2008 [1318] | how will you solve the web part? Plug-in would be usefull here, wouldn't it? :-) |
SteveT 2-Feb-2008 [1319x2] | Yep, perhaps the paid for /pro /master versions may bring it together?? |
I think I spotted mention of a 'Windows Mobile' plug-in the other day? | |
Henrik 2-Feb-2008 [1321] | Steve, feel free to post my comment on your blog. |
Pekr 2-Feb-2008 [1322] | Henrik - any new blog of yours coming? IIRC you planned on something. You have very nice and descriptive style - your VID3 blog was very explanatory .. |
Henrik 2-Feb-2008 [1323] | I have several posts lined up, but still need some research on some topics (time consuming) to complete them. |
Pekr 2-Feb-2008 [1324] | Henrik - to your post. It really sounds a bit terrifying, like old Win 3.1 visaul basic style ;-) I am really scared that I will see OK-button, Cancel-button and such styles. If I will see a pictogram on it, then really - we are going 10 years back - old design imo .... |
Henrik 2-Feb-2008 [1325x3] | Pekr, because you are getting it completely wrong. :-) |
Even OSX does it this way. | |
it has nothing to do with appearance | |
Pekr 2-Feb-2008 [1328] | And I bet that most skinners will get it wrong too ... adding various funky pictograms to those buttons :-) |
Henrik 2-Feb-2008 [1329] | I don't know where you get the idea that VID3's style system will require "funky pictograms". The abstraction is made so (and you know this) that different purpose buttons can have completely identical appearance. In fact, there might be so many button styles that it makes no sense to differ their look. Style designers are completely free to include or exclude funky pictograms. :-) |
Pekr 2-Feb-2008 [1330] | you will not stop ppl to add those pictograms. I did not say anything about a requirement :-) |
Henrik 2-Feb-2008 [1331x2] | I hope nobody stops them. :-) |
and we disagree, because we are discussing it on different levels. :-) | |
SteveT 2-Feb-2008 [1333] | Thanks Henrik, just got back in from being 'forced' to shop :-) |
SteveT 6-Feb-2008 [1334] | Hi all, can anyone at RT outline the widget(controls) that WILL be available in VID3. Perhaps enter them as outlines in the VID User Guide? |
Henrik 6-Feb-2008 [1335x2] | hard to say at this point as I'm not done with that part yet. |
the best guess is the list that already exists in DocBase somewhere. | |
SteveT 6-Feb-2008 [1337] | Hi Henrik, just wanted a feel for where R3 will end up GUI wise. If in twelve months we end up with bells and whistles then cool - an app I've been asked to re-write needs to be very 'plush' so I'm going to have to use something else. |
Henrik 6-Feb-2008 [1338x2] | yes, that's wise for now. I expect also about 12 months before VID3 is near completion with most styles. It's conservative, however. :-) |
styles will probably be similar to the ones found in Trolltech's QT (not appearance, Pekr, but capability. :-)) | |
SteveT 6-Feb-2008 [1340] | Ok, original app was done in Java (for internal use) external front end needs to be video quality, might look at Flex for web front end (now it's open source). |
Pekr 6-Feb-2008 [1341x2] | hehe :-) |
SteveT: why wouldn't you use VID3 for the task given? I think in 12 months VID3 should be pretty mature ... | |
SteveT 6-Feb-2008 [1343] | Hi Petr, It's a background project for me, clients in no mad rush, but will expect me to come up with the goods within twelve months - they also want desktop & web. it's an interactive availability/booking system for group of hotels. |
SteveT 8-Feb-2008 [1344] | Jounal of a Newbie - by SteveT Back on my travels again now (having to do paid work! ;-/ Have learn't an awful lot about Rebol this month. Managed to get a good prototype reasonably functional. Have finsished my little licence maker app for internal use. Our client records believe it or not were just on Excel!! (Mrs T ) likes Excel! So i've created the same data in a simple client app using Henriks List-View and RebDB. Perfect for our internal use. Going to try to learn more about Rebol3 (VID3) during February (Clients permiting !) Steve |
SteveT 20-Feb-2008 [1345] | Hi all, can Rebol load XML structures straight into a block ????? |
Geomol 20-Feb-2008 [1346] | You can with my RebXML found here: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/rebxml/ The script xml2rebxml.r read an XML structure into a block with content defined in the spec: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/rebxml/rebxml-spec.html |
btiffin 20-Feb-2008 [1347] | Kinda ... out of the box XML is not 100% but load/markup may do what you want for some cases If that is not sufficient, some rebols have written extensions. Umm, like John just posted. :) |
SteveT 20-Feb-2008 [1348] | That's great thank's guys ! |
Geomol 20-Feb-2008 [1349] | You're welcome! |
Sunanda 20-Feb-2008 [1350] | 'parse-xml is a standard REBOL function in 'core that does some basic XML processing. It may be enough for you. I use Gavin's XML-parse functions every day: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?script=xml-parse.r Not tried John's yet :-) |
SteveT 20-Feb-2008 [1351] | Thanks Sunanda |
Geomol 20-Feb-2008 [1352] | REBOL is quite useful for web-applications and handling data and technologies born from the internet-boom in the computing world. I bet, there are many REBOL-based solutions out there. |
Gregg 20-Feb-2008 [1353] | PARSE-XML is a built-in func as well. Not as complete as Gavin's, but works well for basic things. The biggest mod I've made to it is to swap the order of element value and attributes in the resulting block. That way you can address the value using path notation or SELECT. Working with attributes takes a little more work. |
Rod 20-Feb-2008 [1354] | So for anyone new to REBOL or more generally to Forth (being one of the inspirations behind REBOL) I'd like to strongly recommend reading Leo Brodie's Thinking Forth - free PDF here - http://thinking-forth.sourceforge.net/ I stumbled across this group of programming books http://prog21.dadgum.com/19.html and it reminded me I had meant to do some reading on Forth. I'm now a third of the way through the Thinking Forth book kicking myself for not having dug into this earlier. Just like learning about the functional perspective with Lisp and Erlang this reading is expanding my programming perspective with every chapter. In addition to being valuable in the REBOL context it is simply a great book on programming in any context. |
btiffin 20-Feb-2008 [1355x2] | Rod. Classic. Not as classic as Starting Forth, but hey. Marcel Hendrix has posted Starting Forth as well, but had trouble with the cartoons, and the replacements are not quite as "fun". And just so ya know, only Marcel was given the right to copy, explicity only Marcel, by Forth Inc. http://home.iae.nl/users/mhx/sf.html |
Whoa. Elizabeth has posted a much nicer reprint on the forth.com site. http://www.forth.com/starting-forth/ Nice! | |
Rod 20-Feb-2008 [1357] | Thanks Brian, will check out starting forth as well. |
older newer | first last |