World: r3wp
[View] discuss view related issues
older newer | first last |
Volker 14-Apr-2005 [914] | hmm, worth trying |
Anton 14-Apr-2005 [915x2] | I wanted to make one of those relative scroller icons as seen in Firefox. One day... |
Well, I got it to colourize some code. Pretty ugly ! ;-) but you're getting there. Interesting "floating" coloured blocks. | |
Volker 14-Apr-2005 [917] | interesting point is, you give it a text-face, a start and end, and a template for markup and do: markup-face ta make markup-face! [color: local/2] start end and then you have markup :) |
Gregg 15-Apr-2005 [918] | Very cool Volker! You never cease to amaze me. |
Volker 15-Apr-2005 [919x2] | *=blush*= :)9 |
:.)9 -> :) | |
ChristianE 15-Apr-2005 [921] | Does anybody know if it's possible to catch third mouse-button's up and down events? I know of the scroll-line and scroll-page thing, but ... |
Anton 15-Apr-2005 [922x3] | I don't think so. Let me check the binary :) |
Nope, there's only down, alt-down, up, alt-up | |
On windows maybe the system port will see the WM_MBUTTONDOWN & UP messages. | |
Volker 16-Apr-2005 [925] | Did you know you can do the whole markup with iterated faces? 1766 markups ~8000kb. |
Anton 17-Apr-2005 [926] | ChristianE, see (if you haven't already) the "Windows (MS)" group, where I posted some extra notes showing the beginning of how these messages can be captured using the system port (only on Windows, obviously). |
DideC 20-Apr-2005 [927] | I remember reading problem about using serial port with View window : you have to move mouse to get proper serial transfer (if not port take 1 sec to respond). Can't remember what was the conclusion about it ? Anybody ? |
Graham 20-Apr-2005 [928] | Petr says he owes me a beer cause I told him the solution to that .. but now I can't recall what it was! :( |
Pekr 20-Apr-2005 [929x3] | neither I .... hmm, I will look into my sources ... |
wasn't it addition of timer to layout? | |
timer: sensor 1x1 rate 0:01 feel [ engage: func [face action event] [ if all [action = 'time] [ do-face face none ] ] ] | |
Graham 20-Apr-2005 [932] | yes, I think it was. |
Anton 25-Apr-2005 [933x2] | www.rebol.net is working (showing the new server) OK. link to rambo is OK (and rambo lists newest bug OK.) link to http://mail.rebol.net/::: 503 Connect failed Your request for http://mail.rebol.net/could not be fulfilled, because the connection to mail.rebol.net (209.167.34.210) could not be established. |
(sorry) | |
Gregg 27-Apr-2005 [935] | Paul, irregular windows - Cyphre did one I'm pretty sure. |
[unknown: 5] 27-Apr-2005 [936] | Thanks Gregg. |
Ashley 27-Apr-2005 [937] | http://www.rebol.cz/~cyphre/trans-gui.r http://www.rebol.cz/~cyphre/trans-win.r |
ChristianE 2-May-2005 [938x2] | Is this a bug or by design? A faces pane, if of type block!, may contain not only face objects, but allows for words too (and maybe other types, but I didn't check this). At least it works and View doesn't complain. I sometimes use this for easy access of faces in crowdy pane; e.g. for faces A, B, C and F I can set do F/PANE: REDUCE ['a A 'b B 'c C]. But now I noticed in some popup-faces' code that SYSTEM/VIEW/WAKE-EVENT fails in such cases because of the line IF GET IN ITEM 'ACTION [BREAK/RETURN FALSE], which I had to patch to IF ALL [OBJECT? ITEM IN ITEM 'ACTION] [BREAK/RETURN FALSE] to make it work through such panes. Well, I'm really uncertain whether it is a good idea to build panes that way and if I have to think of WAKE-EVENT as being buggy, or if by design pane blocks really should consist of nothing but faces and the bug is me ignoring that. So, what do you think? |
I should have mentioned that I do that to - in the above example - refer to the face B by F/PANE/B without having to extend F with an explicit 'reference' to B as in F: MAKE FACE COMPOSE [A: (A) B: (B) C: (C) PANE: (REDUCE [A B C])]. | |
Anton 3-May-2005 [940] | Christian, I don't think there are any official docs on the contents of pane, but I would avoid this approach. Most code would be expecting only faces, eg. code that shuffles faces in order to do depth arrangement is probably not expecting words in there too (and, if it did expect them, should it assume the words are associated with the faces ?) |
Gabriele 3-May-2005 [941x2] | there are two problems: some mezzanine code doesn't work with that (but this could be fixed), and view actually tries to lookup the words. |
that is, if your pane is [b], and b references a face, view will look it up and use it as if the face object was there instead of the word. because of this, your faces will be in the pane TWICE as per the example above. | |
Allen 3-May-2005 [943] | IIRC Cyphre used this approach (using words or lit-words) in SWIS. It does make lookups quite simple, but then again it is not too hard to maintain a separate index block if needed. Keepning the workload down for the rendering of faces is probably a good reason to avoid the 'word approach. |
Volker 3-May-2005 [944x2] | Strictly I would call wake-event buggy. But then popup-faces are usually not that complex. So its a 80/20, the complex faces are easier with words, the simple popups a bit restricted. |
So i favor christians patch. | |
ChristianE 3-May-2005 [946x3] | Gabriele, thanks for the "being in the pane TWICE" explanation: you pointed me to a mysterious "face in more than one pane" error message I wasn't able to track down to it's origin. Should've read "face more than once in pane", though ;-) Then again, it seems to work fine if the word-lookup doesn't evaluate to a face (even non-face objects seem to be allowed). Did you had some special mezzanines in mind which may stumble over this? WAKE-EVENT currently is the first and only one I know of for now. Of course the number of idioms like FOREACH FACE PANE [FACE/...] is legion, so this really may turn out to be problematic. |
Allen, yes, I too expected the extra type cast required to eventually slow down the view engine. As always, it seems to be the old choice between being fast or elegant. But please don't cite me as saying that fast code couldn't be elegant ;-) | |
It's just that the approach seems to fit into the 'code is data and data is code' idea quite nice. | |
Gabriele 3-May-2005 [949] | christian: i remeber seeing the "bug" in the event func that handles keys, too. |
ChristianE 3-May-2005 [950] | Fine, thank you, I'll have a look at that. |
Gabriele 3-May-2005 [951x2] | (that is, i once had a panel with buttons that had a key defined; the keys worked in one case but not in another. basically, in one case i was using a style that used words instead of faces in the pane - so it was easier to probe it for testing - and the function find-key-face didn't recurse into that pane) |
so there's a possibility that this is going to happen somewhere else too... everyone is just expecting faces there, if pane is a block. | |
ChristianE 3-May-2005 [953x2] | Yes, you name the problem. I'm very likely will choose something like Allen suggested or store the references in the face's user-data. They're fixed number, so that wouldn't be much work, it just makes code somewhat lengthy in comparison. Thanks again! |
While wer're at it - I guess this is known: VIEW MAKE FACE [PANE: SELF] crashes REBOL without warning, or, to give it another name, causes the interpreter to quit silently instead of telling me that trying this really makes no sense. I couldn't find something related in RAMBO, though. | |
Gabriele 4-May-2005 [955] | christian: add it to rambo please. |
ChristianE 4-May-2005 [956] | Added as RAMBO Ticket #-205 |
Gabriele 4-May-2005 [957] | #3678 |
BrianW 4-May-2005 [958] | The more I mess with ImageMagick and PIL, the more I like Draw :-) |
Micha 5-May-2005 [959x2] | sortuj: [ items: sort/compare items func [a b ][(pick a n) < pick b n] save %data.txt items show lay ] dodaj: [a: to-url tx/text items: append array/initial 1 reduce [ a [] [] [] ] items show lay ] p: [ field 200 field 100 field 100 field 100 field 100 return] add: func [ /local coll] [ coll: get in layout/offset/origin p 0x0 1x1 'pane insert tail sub-panel/pane coll ] sub-panel: layout [space 2x2 across origin 1x1 ; style label text bold right 60 backcolor blue field 200 field 100 field 100 field 100 field 100 return field 200 field 100 field 100 field 100 field 100 return ] lay: layout [ origin 5x5 space 1x0 across txt 20 "url" tx: field 270 txt 30 "add" [do dodaj] txt 100 center "sprawdz" [] return across h3 200 center red "www" [n: 1 do sortuj ] h3 100 center red "ip"[n: 2 do sortuj ] h3 100 center red "nazwa" [n: 3 do sortuj ] h3 100 center red "kraj" [n: 4 do sortuj] h3 100 center red "agent" [n: 5 do sortuj ] return space 0 panel: box 610x400 blue s1: scroller 16x400 [scroll-panel-vert panel s1] return s2: scroller 300x16 [scroll-panel-horz panel s2] return button "halt" [halt] ] panel/pane: sub-panel scroll-panel-vert: func [pnl bar][ pnl/pane/offset/y: negate bar/data * (max 0 pnl/pane/size/y - pnl/size/y) show pnl ] scroll-panel-horz: func [pnl bar][ pnl/pane/offset/x: negate bar/data * (max 0 pnl/pane/size/x - pnl/size/x) show pnl ] update-panel: func [pnl vbar hbar] [ pnl/pane/offset: 0x0 s1/data: s2/data: 0 hbar/redrag pnl/size/x / pnl/pane/size/x vbar/redrag pnl/size/y / pnl/pane/size/y show [pnl vbar hbar] ] update-panel panel s1 s2 view/new lay do-events |
how to add columny ? | |
eFishAnt 6-May-2005 [961] | Doc's Win95 demo (in Demo's folder of ViewTop breaks on layout/trace, looks like build is involved, but the file is %win95.zip ... on some recent /Views, didn't test all the way back to where it works, but has anyone fixed or know much about it? |
Henrik 6-May-2005 [962] | is there a quick way to set a maximum length of text in a field and automatically unfocus and move to the nexst field in the tab order? E.g. day, month and year fields with limits 2, 2 and 4 and automatically jump to the next field |
Izkata 6-May-2005 [963] | I know of a way, but I wouldn't call it quick - override the engage func. for a field and take advantage of the 'parent-face var in the object... I'll start a quick example if you want to see it |
older newer | first last |