World: r3wp

the trouble is imo with get-net-info - it is so arcane, that it can't 
be true anymore :-) IIRC there is check for old Netscape, parsing 
of prefs.js etc ...., whereas possible mozilla settings are not taken 
care of.

21 secs here for timeout:


start: now/time attempt [read http://www.rebol.com] print now/time 
- start
= 21

And if you change the timeout?

what's wrong with turn off auto-connect in the settings?

New users.

the setting itself is available only after the first timeout, that's 
wrong ;-)

Volker, yes, changing system/standard/port/timout: 5  really seems 
to timeout in 5 secs ....

ok, but you just stated that because almost everyone is on broadband, 
that the timeout doesn't need to be as long. But if everyone is on 
broadband, they should be able to connect :-)

If the band is bound to a proxy, maybe not.

yes, they should, but then rebol's ability to read system proxy settings 
should be fixed - I know what I talk about ;-)

Maybe that 5 sec is worth a rambo-ticket?

I even wrote down the strategy during first plug-in attempt, as it 
had exactly the same problems. But it is imo lost in old World. Imo 
we could try to revise get-net-info instead?

... and yes, lowering the timeout, could make situation more acceptable 
...

5 seconds might not be enough time for the first time user to allow 
the user to respond to a software firewall (to add rebol to the allow 
list) and still get a connection.

Maybe a requester. "Testing proxy" and choice for seconds

if async oes not fix it.

hmm, then get-net-info should be revised ...

Volker - or just not to connect by default, asking dialog if connect 
to internet, or first check settings ...

View already tells you, that you should do system settings, but then 
it tries to connect, which is imo incorrect aproach ...

I agree.

Me too. Needs a dialog where you can change and test.

maybe, but rebcobe binding bug is still not fixed :(((
  rambo says it is.

Ok, you View gurus ... text flow in an area field is handled at the 
View level ?

So, what's the difficulty in using a non rectangular field to flow 
text ?

AFAIK yes. If you mean wrap

yes, I mean wrap.

I don't recall seeing any examples where images are mixed with text, 
and where the text can wrap around the image

It's just a calculation, right?

Yes.

Which you can do yourself, and use multiple faces or draw.

Yes, can do oneself .. or ask for more basic support, or a new widget 
that supports this.

:)

scrolling an image requires changing the offsets in a pane

scrolling text, the pane stays where it is, and the text offset is 
changed

so, I guess if you have mixture of text and graphics, you have to 
scroll the pane?

Yes.

Or, I guess you could put the image in draw and scroll there.

what do you mean ?

AFAIK you can put an image in draw and scale and such things. translation 
and scrolling is the same.

Say, you wanted to edit in situ text that was running along a curve, 
spline.

you would have to detect your mouse click was touching the text somehow 
( so add a feel to the text ) ...and then calculate where it was 
along the text

Hmm. That you need offset-to-caret for such text. I guess we have 
only for normal one, not for agg?

where's the agg docs ?

http://antigrain.com/doc/

Build page update with infos on last release http://www.rebol.net/builds/

and this "This is being done in preparation for the dialected rich-text 
improvements"

yeah ;-)

So we dont get a plugin, isntead write our own browser? :))

Why a browser? getting rich-text is not everything you know :-) Who 
would write parsers for all that web "standards" out there, plus 
support for various browser quirk modes? And what would you do about 
java-script? Are we going to reimplement javascript in rebol too? 
:-)

I totally forgot *you* are here :) Yes, i was joking :))