World: r3wp
[View] discuss view related issues
older newer | first last |
Anton 22-Oct-2005 [2987] | Everyone's experience will be different. |
Chris 22-Oct-2005 [2988] | Use the keyword 'as-is |
Luca 22-Oct-2005 [2989x2] | Anton - I navigated each single 'area word but I couldn't find the reason. I didn't think that the difference was in 'field instead. Thank you! |
Chris - 'as-is works too, but what is it? I coundn't find it nowhere. | |
Chris 22-Oct-2005 [2991x2] | It's a flag in the 'text style that will prevent face/init from doing a trim/lines on the face/text. |
probe get in get-style 'text 'init | |
Luca 22-Oct-2005 [2993] | Thank you :-) |
Henrik 23-Oct-2005 [2994x2] | I can't seem to figure out the solution to do this elegantly: If I have a pane with 4 faces [a b c d] and I want 'b to move to position 'd: [a c d b], is there no easier way than to copy, remove and append 'b? |
ah, found something that seems to work. never mind | |
Henrik 26-Oct-2005 [2996x2] | Would it be a good idea to open source the Viewtop editor just like it happened with the Viewtop? It has a lot of obvious bugs that could be fixed by people outside RT. |
(or is it a part of the Viewtop?) | |
DideC 26-Oct-2005 [2998] | Its part of Viewtop (vt-editor.r). But it as been update in View 1.3, so current ViewTop sources are outdated. Unless it has been re-release, but I'm not aware of that. |
Volker 26-Oct-2005 [2999] | Its now in the beta-sdk, dont know how public that is. and you can get the source by "probe ctx-edit" from a fresh console. but without comments then. |
Allen 26-Oct-2005 [3000] | In IOS there is a flag that allows, the users default editor to be used instead. It was proposed to implement that in the view desktop as well, I'm not sure if it got in there. |
Volker 26-Oct-2005 [3001] | just redefine 'editor and use call. but i like the inbuild one for quick things. |
Henrik 26-Oct-2005 [3002] | So do I, which is why I think it would be nice to get bugs fixed and some simple features added like a search/replace and maybe a simple undo. I use it alot. |
Luca 27-Oct-2005 [3003] | What is the ViewTop editor? Does exists a rebol written editor to code rebol programs? Is it in the /SDK package? |
Pekr 27-Oct-2005 [3004] | no, simply put - go to Desktop, right-click any icon or file, choose "Edit" |
Luca 27-Oct-2005 [3005] | :-) thank you! |
Henrik 27-Oct-2005 [3006x2] | or in the console, type: >> editor "" |
write in some code, save it and press ctrl-E to run it. brilliant for testing code snippets | |
Pekr 27-Oct-2005 [3008x2] | why do I use notepad then? ;-) |
did not know it is so easy without going to Desktop, thanks :-) | |
Henrik 27-Oct-2005 [3010] | also nice for viewing large objects... >> editor system |
Luca 27-Oct-2005 [3011] | What about an editor that help you navigate your program thru funcs, contexts, blocks..., with backup service and temming? |
Henrik 27-Oct-2005 [3012] | I've been thinking about this. But how far would we want to go? Simple as in the current editor, intermediate or a fullblown IDE? |
Luca 27-Oct-2005 [3013x2] | Hmm, probably a step by step is the best solution. :-) |
Pick up an editor and start adding some functionalities. We can decide what to add before. | |
Volker 27-Oct-2005 [3015x3] | Some editors can be controlled by call, by calling them with file and position. they use the curently opened window then. so you need only the navigator. |
But does somebody really need that? | |
(In which case i could revisit some prototypes.) | |
Luca 27-Oct-2005 [3018] | I meant write the editor in rebol. Otherwise I thougth to implement an Eclispe plugin (Eclipse is a very good platform in my opinion) but why have I to spend time using Java? |
Volker 27-Oct-2005 [3019x2] | (which -> that) |
The editor in rebol can be controlled that way too, with some tricks. | |
Henrik 27-Oct-2005 [3021] | I'd much rather see a tad more advanced version of the current viewtop editor. No fancy features like syntax highlighting, but useful stuff like indenting, search/replace and undo. It shouldn't feel heavier than now |
Luca 27-Oct-2005 [3022] | I think that every developer need a good developer environment, don't they? |
Volker 27-Oct-2005 [3023] | question is what is good. scrolling and searching beats a java-style treeview with small things. |
Henrik 27-Oct-2005 [3024] | luca: for me a good developer environment is one that can be started with an executable less than 1 MB, and start typing immediately and press one hotkey to run the program, and you can learn to use it in about 8 minutes. |
Luca 27-Oct-2005 [3025] | I agree with you. This is why I'd like to have it written in rebol. :-) |
Henrik 27-Oct-2005 [3026] | oh and no wizards |
Luca 27-Oct-2005 [3027] | I agree too. |
Henrik 27-Oct-2005 [3028] | wizards are a good indication that you are using something that can be too complex for the average developer and that gaining full control will take you months of learning. |
Volker 27-Oct-2005 [3029] | DO you speak of rebol-headers with auto-date and version update? :) |
Luca 27-Oct-2005 [3030] | :-D ... so navigation features are not useful neither? |
Volker 27-Oct-2005 [3031] | MY prefered navigation is grep, not some structured view. give me every "this-word" in files. |
Luca 27-Oct-2005 [3032] | Even if the file is "big"? |
Volker 27-Oct-2005 [3033] | I get a seperate list with the hits and can jump from there. emacs. |
Henrik 27-Oct-2005 [3034] | volker, well... that's a border line. Its more that wizards that can set up a set of files for a compile and you have various profiles to work against, but you can't really understand what's going on behind the Wizard Curtain. I guess this is OK when you are working with C or ObjC programs when you want to build libraries and things that are OS specific, but it also tells me that this is hard, by default. REBOL should absolutely never go in that direction or encourage it. |
Volker 27-Oct-2005 [3035] | but could be done in rebol with the control-editor-trick. |
Henrik 27-Oct-2005 [3036] | PARSE could do wonders for a small function browser. I built one not long ago. |
older newer | first last |