World: r3wp
[View] discuss view related issues
older newer | first last |
Graham 17-Jun-2005 [1455] | Carl, what about alerts? |
Carl 17-Jun-2005 [1456x2] | You see... more than 1 man band now. |
Alerts.... eg. above comment? | |
Graham 17-Jun-2005 [1458] | alerts, no longer stay on top of calling window |
Carl 17-Jun-2005 [1459x2] | Well.... quite frankly, I think we still need some spit an polish on those modals. Yep. |
So, it used to, but not now? I'm surprised it ever did. | |
Graham 17-Jun-2005 [1461x2] | up till about March 2004 it did. |
Then it changed. | |
Carl 17-Jun-2005 [1463] | Well, that's not good. Is it listed as a bug in RAMBO? |
Brock 17-Jun-2005 [1464] | Carl, regarding no longer a one man band... Anything to announce on the arrangement you have made with these members of the community? Is it a permanent one or temporary, etc? |
Graham 17-Jun-2005 [1465] | Just posted it this morning. |
Carl 17-Jun-2005 [1466x2] | We live by RAMBO --- so if it's not there, it's not likely to be fixed. |
I hear the dinner bell.... | |
Brock 17-Jun-2005 [1468] | By the way... to see you up for air ;-) |
Graham 17-Jun-2005 [1469x2] | I don't. |
Before you eat .. when can we see a new SDK? | |
Carl 17-Jun-2005 [1471x3] | So... will check back again after dinner.... |
Parts of the SDK are being posted. More very soon. | |
BB in a while. Bye! | |
Graham 17-Jun-2005 [1474] | Great news there. |
BrianW 18-Jun-2005 [1475x2] | Is the source for the Rebol text editor available anywhere? |
The basic one in Rebol/View Desktop, that is. | |
Volker 18-Jun-2005 [1477x2] | for an older version in the published desktop-source. |
and you can get the source from console. dont run the editor before, save %edi.r ctx-edit IIRC. | |
BrianW 18-Jun-2005 [1479] | ok, am I understanding this correctly? 1. Find and download the older desktop-source (which I guess includes edi.r) 2. Start Rebol/View and issue the command %edi.r ctx-edit Right? |
Volker 18-Jun-2005 [1480] | No ;) |
BrianW 18-Jun-2005 [1481] | oh :-D |
Volker 18-Jun-2005 [1482x5] | with the source you need only that edit.r |
but the source is included in the exe too. | |
so you can basically source it. since it is somewhat long, better save ;) | |
the real source may have some comments more, but more effort to get. | |
(at least that was the way with the old exes, not tried with the new) | |
BrianW 18-Jun-2005 [1487x2] | hm. Okay, I get lots of code with "source ctx-edit", but I can't figure out how to get it into a file. I keep trying stuff like --> write %edit.r source ctx-edit |
That dumps the source to the console and throws an error about 'write missing an arg | |
Volker 18-Jun-2005 [1489x3] | No, its just a block. simply save it. dont use 'source. |
thats why i said "basically source". | |
the you need also "source editor". this time really source, because it is small. ;) | |
BrianW 18-Jun-2005 [1492] | ah, so it is :-) |
Volker 18-Jun-2005 [1493x2] | 'editor looks for ctx-edit and if it a block, it makes it a context (saves a bit memory when not used. |
so you must dump ctx-edit and call it ctx-edit again. save %edi.r compose/only[ ctx-edit: (ctx-edit) ] ; not tested. | |
BrianW 18-Jun-2005 [1495x2] | Hey, sweet. Who made Rebol highlighting work for Crimson Editor? |
Perfect! Thanks, Volker. | |
Ashley 19-Jun-2005 [1497] | Anyone know what happened to all the registry functions in View 1.3? create-reg native! Creates a registry key and returns TRUE on success... delete-reg native! Deletes a registry key. Returns TRUE if deleted. (... exists-reg? native! Returns TRUE if registry key exists. (HKCU is defa... get-reg native! Returns value of a registry key, else NONE. (HKCU ... list-reg native! Returns a block of sub-keys for a registry key. (H... set-reg native! Sets registry key value. Returns value on success,... unset-reg-funcs function! [] I hope they aren't gone for good! |
Vincent 19-Jun-2005 [1498] | registry access wasn't for user REBOL/View - it's a Windows only /Command feature. As they are used in installation, these were exposed in alpha/beta builds, but "internal" funcs aren't available in official release... You can note the registry access is/was incomplete: - only string! datatype is available, not dword - how one lists the values under a key? 'list-reg only returns sub-keys, not values. |
[unknown: 5] 19-Jun-2005 [1499] | Yeah I posted a feedback asking for more support with windows registry and especially remote registry capabilities since many of the things I do are accessing remote computers in the enterprise. |
Pekr 19-Jun-2005 [1500x2] | please could it be done someway, that Desktop (or even upgrade function) would include auto-installatiion? If no installation was performed, then it would just switch .exes. So - new .exe would be downloaded. It would be launched, first running instance ended, new one copied to the place of first one, launched, and downloaded version deleted? |
It is already nice we are offered new version, but would be even cooler if it would offer (we can ask user for that) to install after download. btw - change those old buttons on the upgrade dialog box, as it is incompatible with new button look we use for Dekstop ... | |
[unknown: 5] 19-Jun-2005 [1502] | I think the upgrade utility should drop the acknowledgement "name of the file" part as it looks sloppy because I saved the file as "view2.exe" because the currently file couldn't be overwritten and it said I saved the file as "view.exe". Just gives a bad impression of what else might be buggy. |
MikeL 19-Jun-2005 [1503] | Paul re: Windows Registry you might want to look up / find Frank Sievertsen's RegEdit. It was dated 21-8-01 |
Ashley 19-Jun-2005 [1504] | http://www.rebol.org/library/scripts-download/registry.r |
older newer | first last |