World: r3wp
[Core] Discuss core issues
older newer | first last |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7382x2] | system/schemes/http/user: "user" system/schemes/http/pass: "pass" ?? |
a: read/custom [site: "www.site.com" scheme: 'http user: "user" pass: "pass"] [post "stuff"] | |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7384] | First didn't work, second gave invalid port spec error. |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7385x2] | Umm, is it https? Need rebcmd for that I think. or add port: 80 maybe... |
Sorry, I get it wrong everytime. It's host: not site: | |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7387] | If it matters, I am accessing an Outlook Web Access site, https scheme, with /Command. |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7388] | Try host: "..." scheme: 'https ... my mistake. |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7389] | That worked, but now I'm getting a "Method not allowed" error from the server. I'm trying to enable junk email folders on an Exchange server and apparently the only way to do so is with a 100+ line VBScript that translates to a one-line REBOL script, but neither seem to work with this server. |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7390] | try [url: "www.site.com/prog.cgi" ...] instead of host:: |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7391] | I tried host and path and that builds the url properly, but now I get a different server error that REBOL doesn't print all of so I can't see it. I can't seem to trap the error so I can print the whole thing. |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7392x2] | Or maybe [host: "www.site.com" url: "prog.cgi"] |
Can you prepend the read with print to get the rest of the message? | |
Izkata 6-Apr-2007 [7394x2] | >> probe decode-url http://www.junk.net/path/to/index.html make object! [ user: none pass: none host: "www.junk.net" port-id: none path: "path/to/" target: "index.html" ] |
try with those... | |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7396] | It never gets to the read - it fails on open. When I tried TRACE/NET ON I saw the error: HTTP/1.1 440 Login Timeout What's that? |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7397] | https authentication. No experience. Sorry. |
Graham 6-Apr-2007 [7398] | what type of authentication is it? |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7399] | It's Basic authentication. |
Graham 6-Apr-2007 [7400x2] | is it simple authentication ? |
ok. | |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7402x3] | AFAICT |
Authorization: Basic Q0NFU1xBZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yOiFNVFVTQSYqKA== | |
Is that digest? | |
Graham 6-Apr-2007 [7405x2] | read/custom http://user:[password-:-somewere-:-com] [ post ... ] doesn't work? |
because the password has some funny characters in it?? | |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7407] | It does. |
Graham 6-Apr-2007 [7408] | Ok, you can change the parse rule to allow the @ or whatever |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7409x2] | Nonetheless, the error I got with the port spec is the same that the VBScript from Microsoft's web site gets. |
Any way to increase the timeout? | |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7411] | You can try port: open [spec] insert port mold ['post stuff] result: copy port ??? the insert may need more.... {POST HTTP/1.1 ... somesuch |
Graham 6-Apr-2007 [7412] | yes |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7413] | And what would that way be? :) |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7414] | The command docs mention something about initiating ssl connections with port: open/direct ssl://url:portnum then a set-modes port [secure: true] to initiate authentication... |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7415] | Brian, read/custom [scheme: 'https host: "server" path: "path/to/stuff" user: "username" pass: "password"] works. I don't need to recreate the port scheme, as it does that secure: true in its code. I get the same error with Microsoft's VBScript fix. I think it's something server-side. Thanks for the help with the syntax though - it's been a while. |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7416x2] | There is a system/schemes/http/timeout field probably the same for https |
Yeah me too, This is the kinda code that my brain treats as fire-and-forget. Need to do it again...look it up again. :) | |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7418] | Timeout is ignored. Must be a server misconfiguration (just a guess based on how messed up this server is). |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7419] | There are threads in MS Tech net about 440 timeouts when Exchange enables Form Authentication. All I've seen so far is Help Help messages, not fixes... http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1110323&SiteID=17 Is one example. |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7420x2] | According to MS's blogs, the only way to enable Exchange's server-side junk mail folders is to do so through Outlook Web Access on a per-user basis. The only way they suggest to do so for all users is to post: cmd=options junkemailstate=1 cmd=savejunkemailrule to every user, logging in as a domain administrator. They provide a 100+ line VBScript to do this for a list of names in a file. When that failed, I figured that I could do the same in 1 or 2 lines of REBOL, and I was correct: I get the same exact failure the VBScript gets in 1 line of REBOL :( |
Interesting. That site you linked to seems to narrow this down to forms-based authentication, which is enabled om my server. I'm going to try temporarily disabling it and see if that helps. | |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7422] | Drummm rollll |
BrianH 6-Apr-2007 [7423] | Worked! |
btiffin 6-Apr-2007 [7424x2] | Yippee...if you can disable FBA long term... There may be a more permanent solution...I didn't read all of it. http://www.chicagotech.net/exchange/owa440.htm |
Brian; Don't forget to post your REBOL solution to the place you got the VBScript. :) | |
Henrik 8-Apr-2007 [7426x2] | doh! I'd been hunting a bug in LIST-VIEW all day and it turns out that Ladislav's BUILD function does funny stuff to paths: >> build [append/only [] []] == [append/unset [] []] |
The solution seems to be: >> build [only 'append/only [] []] == [append/only [] []] | |
Gregg 8-Apr-2007 [7428x2] | Gotta watch those advanced libs. :-) The tricky stuff, like REBOL itself, often has a few things you have to trip over a couple times before setting a flag in your brain. |
Thanks for the post on this. I haven't hit it, but I might someday. | |
ChristianE 8-Apr-2007 [7430x2] | If [APPEND/ONLY [] []] is what you were looking for to recieve with the help of BUILD, Henrik, BUILD/WITH [APPEND/ONLY [] []] [] works, too, and to me it seems to be a bit more intuitive. |
But since BUILD [A/B [] []] gives [A/B [] []] as one would expect, I'd say this is a real bug in BUILD. You probably should let Ladislav know. | |
older newer | first last |