World: r3wp
[Core] Discuss core issues
older newer | first last |
BrianW 14-Mar-2005 [727] | aha? Yes, yes? |
Ammon 14-Mar-2005 [728] | A favorite subject of mine. ;-) |
BrianW 14-Mar-2005 [729] | heh. |
Ammon 14-Mar-2005 [730] | in 'test-case-test, you are redefining 'test-result as a function, not globaly so you aren't actually changing the definition but adding a new one to the current context. |
BrianW 14-Mar-2005 [731] | oh jeez. Thanks :-) |
Ammon 14-Mar-2005 [732] | so when you 'make 'test-result you are making a function not the object that you thought that you were making... |
BrianW 14-Mar-2005 [733x2] | Is there a flag I can set to warn when something is being redefined? |
I changed function 'test-result to function 'test-result-summary and everything is golden again. | |
Ammon 14-Mar-2005 [735x3] | You can keep your current set up with the redefined 'test-result but you will need to run 'compose on the spec block being passed to 'test-case-test and enclose 'test-result in a paren |
Not for something like this, particularly since you aren't actually redefining anything! ;~> | |
You're creating a NEW definition in a NEW context. | |
BrianW 14-Mar-2005 [738x2] | so ... test-case-test: make test-case compose([ ... ]) |
Did I understand that correctly? | |
Ammon 14-Mar-2005 [740x2] | almost |
'compose evaluates any parens in the block passed to it. If you are passing 'compose a block containing blocks that contain values you would like composed then you need to use the /deep refinement of compose | |
BrianW 14-Mar-2005 [742] | ow. |
Ammon 14-Mar-2005 [743] | ; (i.e. test-case-test: make test-case compose/deep [ ... test-result-formating: func [/local ed][ ed: make (test-result) ... ] ] |
BrianW 14-Mar-2005 [744x2] | I think I'll avoid 'compose for now, and leave it for when I'm done with the basic stuff in the test book. |
but that's good to know, thanks again. | |
Ammon 14-Mar-2005 [746] | Np, you're welcome! |
Gregg 14-Mar-2005 [747] | obj-spec: func [ "Returns the object spec as a single line (flat) string." obj [object!] /only "no surrounding brackets" /mold "Multi-line MOLDed format" /local res ][ res: copy find/tail system/words/mold obj "make object! " if not mold [trim/lines res] if only [res: trim/auto next head remove back tail next res] res ] remove-words: func [ "Returns a copy of the object with the specified words removed." object [object!] words [word! block!] "The word, or words, to remove" /local spec ][ spec: load obj-spec object foreach word compose [(words)] [ remove/part find spec to set-word! word 2 ] make object! spec ] |
Micha 15-Mar-2005 [748] | how to count difference time x: now/precise == 15-Mar-2005/11:01:58.139+1:00 y: now/precise == 15-Mar-2005/11:02:38.733+1:00 x - y = |
Graham 15-Mar-2005 [749] | help difference |
Micha 15-Mar-2005 [750] | subtract |
Graham 15-Mar-2005 [751] | difference now/precise now/precise |
Micha 15-Mar-2005 [752x3] | block: [ "a:" "string1" "b:" "string2" ] Fremowe: func [x y][return remove remove find x y ] Fremowe block "a:" |
not remove a ? | |
what this function does not act ? | |
Pekr 15-Mar-2005 [755x2] | 1) You don't have to use return word ...., function does return the last point of its evaluation |
and besides that, it works here ... | |
DideC 16-Mar-2005 [757] | He guys, I need you !!! |
Volker 16-Mar-2005 [758] | ping? |
DideC 16-Mar-2005 [759] | I want to get in a Rebol script what I print on a standard windows printer. I use Redmon (part of ghostview) to redirect what the printer get to my rebol script RedMon : http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/redmon/index.htm I'm under Windows. How can I get data from the standard input ? I have tried "copy system/standard/input" and also "input", but get nothing !! plis help ;-) |
Volker 16-Mar-2005 [760x4] | have you tried -w? that uses dos-window as console AFAIK. |
or use a temporary file? | |
Ah, this looks like a cgi-stype call. i would try --cgi then. it should do this "call and get data from stdin". | |
cgi-stype -> cgi-style | |
Micha 16-Mar-2005 [764x2] | ;serwer proxy p: make port! tcp://:80 p/awake: func [ port /local data conn targed cmd partner url ] [ conn: first port wait conn data: to-string copy conn replace/all data "^M" "" source data targed: copy/part data find data "HTTP/1.1" data: find/tail data "^/" print targed cmd: parse targed none url: decode-url cmd/2 if not url/path [url/path: "" ] if not url/target [url/target: ""] partner: open/no-wait to-url rejoin [ "tcp://" url/host ":80" ] insert partner rejoin [ cmd/1" /" url/path url/target " HTTP/1.1^/" data] wait partner tmp: copy partner close partner insert conn tmp close conn ] append system/ports/wait-list p open/binary/no-wait p wait [] halt |
what this server not act ? | |
Anton 16-Mar-2005 [766x2] | what this server not act ? --> "why does this server not work ?" |
print [rebol/product rebol/version] | |
Micha 16-Mar-2005 [768x2] | View 1.2.55.3.1 |
partner sends to conn only first packet | |
Anton 16-Mar-2005 [770x4] | insert partner rejoin [ cmd/1" /" url/path url/target " HTTP/1.1^/" data] ?? data wait partner |
data looks ok ? | |
partner: open/direct/no-wait .... | |
OR... partner: open/no-wait ... insert partner ... update partner ; <------- wait partner | |
Volker 16-Mar-2005 [774x3] | conn: first port wait conn ; such things in /awake may be a problem. |
i would not use /awake in your case. more like forever[ wait port your-code-here ] | |
also you have both server and client in the same process? this 'partner? i write such things using two consoles, one for client, one for server. | |
older newer | first last |