World: r3wp
[Core] Discuss core issues
older newer | first last |
Ladislav 11-Feb-2007 [7111] | the last line should have been: foreach word math-words [set word get in system/words word] |
Volker 11-Feb-2007 [7112] | yes. but keep in mind bind ignores functions and objects, so you must recurse into them too. |
Maxim 11-Feb-2007 [7113x6] | can anyone confirm that these two statements should return the same value for the same blk and val? select blk val second find blk val as long as val does exist in blk. |
does select reduce both args before selecting? | |
my god... REBOL is going nuts! I have a situation where the above is not true... and the select pairs are [aword an-object bword another-object] | |
and only the find works... if I try to select using 'aword it always returns none | |
print first reduce blk raises an error as expected since aword is not defined anywhere! | |
help! this is tooo strange! | |
Anton 11-Feb-2007 [7119x2] | relax... rebol is probably not going nuts. There is a reason somewhere. |
quickly make a little example file which demonstrates the problem using a new console. | |
Maxim 11-Feb-2007 [7121x3] | hehe... its just that no probing or printing reveals anything out of the expected. |
using a new console, things behave as expected... which is why I am wondering why they don't in the running code | |
(using a block with simple values, the two lines above act as I would expect) | |
Anton 11-Feb-2007 [7124] | Ok, then fork the entire code and cut away chunks until it no longer displays the problem. |
Maxim 11-Feb-2007 [7125x2] | ehh impossible... we are talking bout an entire app here... 200-300kb of code. probably... and the problem occurs within an event loop. |
but look at the simplicity of the two lines above... can you image a way in which the select would return none and the find would return the object? | |
Anton 11-Feb-2007 [7127x2] | (not impossible - that technique works when I can think of nothing else). |
A confusion between lit-words and words maybe ? | |
Maxim 11-Feb-2007 [7129x2] | hum... |
unfortunatetely, I can't print the block, cause the objects have nested objects, and that causes an out of memory err, If I try to mold it :-( | |
Anton 11-Feb-2007 [7131x2] | write clipboard:// mold/all blk and paste it (and mold/all VAL) into a new editor window. |
Ah.. | |
Maxim 11-Feb-2007 [7133] | the actual app takes very little ram, but the objects, have bidirectional linking... so I guess the mold never reaches the end. |
Anton 11-Feb-2007 [7134] | Ok, then, for your test, before molding, process each object to set none all fields which could recurse. |
Maxim 11-Feb-2007 [7135x4] | hum... I'll try my inspector... maybe it can help me a bit... |
oops... closed altme by mistake... the inspector basically has the same problem... | |
I'm trying some block alterations... | |
wrt lit-word vs word... find is reacting as expected.... select is numb like a frog on ice | |
Anton 11-Feb-2007 [7139] | Maybe check that BLK really has the expected types in the correct order. |
Maxim 11-Feb-2007 [7140x6] | oh my... I just found it... same? :select get in system/words 'select == false |
seems some code redefines select somewhere... >:-( | |
well, thanks for bearing with me... your words vs lit-words idea... got me probing differently.. | |
strangely, I can't trace where that is happeneing... willl try to protect the word... | |
well, as usually protect doesn't help... arrgh. | |
(as usuall) | |
Anton 11-Feb-2007 [7146] | protect doesn't help ? Is SELECT redefined despite being protected ? |
Maxim 11-Feb-2007 [7147x5] | well, protect, only helps within the global context... which is why I wish there was /HARD mode which protected ANY setup of a specific word. |
probably also can protect word within a context... but at that point, the damage is usually done. | |
I've discoverd another way to discover where a set occurs... within objects, you look at the first... and the natural order of words, is a telling clue... | |
first self | |
well found it... and its a biggie :-( deep within glayout... well... its actually pretty easy for fix there, though. | |
Maxim 12-Feb-2007 [7152] | why the hell did I use select... its actually quite strange that this is the first time I've hit this snag in 3 years though ! |
Anton 12-Feb-2007 [7153x2] | I should just point out that only the system/words object can grow dynamically. |
Other objects have fixed order of words. | |
Maxim 12-Feb-2007 [7155] | the issue is that as it is a commonly used feature, although easy to fix within glayout... many references to in my apps will break... ahh... |
Anton 12-Feb-2007 [7156] | The order does not change after the initial SET. |
Maxim 12-Feb-2007 [7157] | yes. |
Anton 12-Feb-2007 [7158] | >> set 'var-1 1 == 1 >> set 'var-2 2 == 2 >> set 'var-1 3 == 3 >> print mold skip tail first system/words -4 [Comments in-obj var-1 var-2] |
Maxim 12-Feb-2007 [7159x2] | how the hell did I not realise I was overiding such a core word? sometimes the obvious just slips by... when you're looking the other way ' :-/ |
yes anton, which is why I discovered where it was being set... after a func called 'layout (this one voluntarily being an override) | |
older newer | first last |