World: r3wp

Or do you want to catch any lit-word?

Anton...I was afraid that would be the answer...course, maybe it 
works anyway...where a function! is used in the place of an action! 
(however, I dread there might be some side-effect if action! needs 
a context, and that context it needs is not provided by the function! 
substitute.

I will let you know if I reach a pitfall with my approach (so far, 
so good...;-)

Volker, the parse rule occurs in a BEER callback .. and I need to 
change the parse rule depending upon which BEER function I am calling. 
 Of course, there are always workrounds one can set up, but was wondering 
if there was some way to relax the REBOL interpreter when building 
up dynamic code like this.

I found myself writing lots of BEER code that all looked the same 
...

Seems the 'case statement is not in the encap from July last year 
and it's a native.
Anyone have source for a mezzanine case statement ?

Ahh... someone just posted one to rebol.org, but it doesn't work 
the same way as the native.

Ladislav's PIF function appears to be functionally similar to the 
new case construct

The old domain still seems to work

http://www.fm.vslib.cz/%7Eladislav/rebol/pif.r

Great! A case statement! I have been waiting for that!

I like the functionality too. nice!

if you rename PIF to CASE (in the PIF source too), you hardly can 
find a difference

is there a way to use a function with a refinement as a word?

something like:

do-a-function either condition ['ref][none] <arguments>

as opposed to the clumsier:


either condition [do-a-function/ref <arguments>][do-a-function <arguments>]

No good ways. You can build a path and do that.

Dialect

You can try multimethods.r

And have two singleton methods on the argument ref.

for own functions once i had an idea, but never really used:

f: func[/a va /b vb /opts blk][
 if opts[do bind blk 'opts] 
 ?? a ?? b
]
f/opts [a: 5]

hmm... a bit confused about the BIND part...

it binds the opts-blk to the locals. then you can set the locals 
from the caller.

still confusing, but

ref-a: none
val-a: "A"
ref-b: true
val-b: "B"

f/opts [a: ref-a if ref-a[va: val-a]  b: ref-b if ref-b[vb: val-b]]

but then it needs a composeto avoid name-clashes. maybe not the best 
idea.

you lost me :-) but it's ok, I'll try something with build-path...

You can do this:

do to-path reduce ['do-a-function either condition ['ref][none]] 
<argument>
but if it's less clumpsy, you deside!

; Try this way, no reduce or to-path...

do either condition ['do-a-function/ref] [:do-a-function] <argument>

; Or this
do pick [do-a-function/ref do-a-function] condition <argument>

Graham:

>> word: to lit-word! 'literal
== 'literal
>> parse [literal] [word]
== true

lots of different solutions to my problem... thanks everyone :-)

a comment on ATTEMPT. I think it's a wonderful function, but don't 
overuse it because it can make your code hard to debug when nothing 
happens where there should be an error.

true

i only use it for single calls.

Steve, when it comes to SIXTH, I wouldn't worry too much.

Is there a way to set and read windows environmental variables ?

'get-env ?

thanks.

Does it work ?

works with "path" ..

env

'scuse me...

Perhaps I need to reboot for rebol to pick up user env variables 
?

>> get-env "APPDATA"

== {C:\Documents and Settings\Gabriele Santilli\Dati applicazioni}

I had to reboot for this to work.

You mean, you set a new user env variable, and rebol wasn't able 
to pick it up straight away ?

logout and login probably sufficient

didn't try that ...

i'm running into a strange issue with the prerebolizer... it is taking 
a part of one line from my main rebol file and then a few blocks 
of another rebol file and overwriting another seemingly random rebol 
file with this data... has anyone run into this problem or have any 
idea what could be causing the problem?  i am using Preprossor 2.0.0