World: r3wp
[RAMBO] The REBOL bug and enhancement database
older newer | first last |
Graham 12-May-2005 [485] | Pity .. I was wondering what the status of my submissions was. |
Anton 12-May-2005 [486x3] | Bug #3099: looks much better although I noticed this: >> to-integer -2147483648.0 ** Math Error: Math or number overflow ** Where: to-integer ** Near: to integer! :value |
Bug #3403 Looks good to me on View 1.2.103 | |
Bug #3436 looks good and solid by View 1.2.102 | |
shadwolf 13-May-2005 [489x3] | don't know if it's really a bug ... |
>> greater-or-equal? 1.2.48.3.1 system/version == false >> system/version == 1.2.102.3.1 >> | |
if it's a bug it could be cool to patch it too ... | |
DideC 13-May-2005 [492x2] | >> help greater-or-equal? USAGE: GREATER-OR-EQUAL? value1 value2 DESCRIPTION: Returns TRUE if the first value is greater than or equal to the second value. GREATER-OR-EQUAL? is an action value. ARGUMENTS: value1 -- (Type: any) value2 -- (Type: any) |
So you have to invert arguments : greater-or-equal? system/version 1.2.48.3.1 | |
Ladislav 13-May-2005 [494] | RE #3099: >> to integer! #{80000000} == -2147483648 >> - to integer! #{80000000} == -2147483648 |
Gabriele 13-May-2005 [495x2] | about: http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=3363&do you think FIND should stay as it is for compatibility? or it's better to change it? |
Carl: "On negate bug: looks like a C compiler problem. I may be able to fix that with an explicit check for that value, but it will slow down the function by a lot. Is that worth it?" | |
Volker 13-May-2005 [497x3] | what is that negate-bug? Ladislavs example? thats an overflow. 0 is "positive", so there is one negative number more. and negative numbers count downward, all bits on is highest possible. the conversion is: invert all bits, add 1. gives #{7FF..}, + 1 #{800..} |
find - hmm. till 'as-string it was handy with big data. now we can rewrite it, but detecting that use is tricky. but its surely a surprise. maybe we can forbid find without /case for a while with binary? gibing some usefull warning. | |
i have a wish: integrating 'comment in some more dialects. parse, layout come to mind. could then be used for embedded documentation. what do you think? | |
BrianH 13-May-2005 [500x2] | I second the request for comment! |
Pun aside, of course. | |
Gabriele 14-May-2005 [502] | a lot of bugs fixed: http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?sort=1&limit=2&cmd=Search&id=&pattern=&subject-only=true |
Volker 14-May-2005 [503x5] | 3662 parse/lines second arg: how to split into lines and apply the rule to each line? a grep: parse/lines string-with-list-of-file-names [ set file thru ".r" end ( ?? file ) ] |
btw, can we discuss auto-dequoting again? maybe together with /all? i don't like such surprises: !>> parse { a b } "^/" == "a" "b" | |
correction, result is == ["a" "b"] my "do from editor molded /only.. | |
#3659 to-idate: i would like that fix native. that seconds are always included, even if 0. makes little clocks much nicer. and if one really dont want seconds, copy/part "00:00:00" 5 is easy. | |
(means i would fix form/mold, not to-idate) | |
Gabriele 14-May-2005 [508x3] | Tom: can you please check if 3676 still applies to 1.2.104? |
#3256: it doesn't crash here. does it crash for any of you with 1.2.104? | |
Brett: do you have the example code for #3420? is it still broken? | |
Vincent 14-May-2005 [511] | #3463 : still crash with 1.2.104 - the problem is not construct/with, it's using an object containing a recursive block as prototype : b: copy [] append/only b b an-object: make object! [a: b] make an-object [] ; crash |
Volker 14-May-2005 [512] | like b: copy [] append/only b b copy/deep b make object makes deep copies of all blocks. sure that crashes. crash should should be a softer? |
Brett 15-May-2005 [513] | Gabriele: Yes it stills seems wrong to me. Compare the last two columns of the display given by this: http://www.codeconscious.com/rebol/mlscripts/multiply-effect-test.r (Tested on REBOL/View 1.2.105.3.1 14-May-2005 Core 2.6.1) |
Gabriele 15-May-2005 [514] | thanks brett. added link to ticket. |
Romano 15-May-2005 [515] | Anamonitor fails on the last beta, i do not know why: ** Script Error: Invalid graphics face object ** Where: view ** Near: show scr-face if new [do-events] |
Pekr 15-May-2005 [516] | could it be regarded a bug in interpreter parser? >> ; test >> ; test "aaaa ** Syntax Error: Missing " at ; test "aaaa |
Tomc 15-May-2005 [517] | Gabriele: where might I find 1.2.104 for Solaris (sans X11) |
Graham 15-May-2005 [518x2] | favourite bug - the one where an encapped application is unable to launch another instance after it does a system call |
But for 1.3 .. I have to think about this. | |
[unknown: 10] 16-May-2005 [520x4] | Particles & Bubbles demo are a true CPU eater under linux... refresh of the GUI desktop under linux drops very quickly when 2 times running Particles demo... |
rebview1210242 does not kill child processes when executed like $ ./rebview1210242 & [1] 9203 $ [1]+ Stopped ./rebview1210242 $ ps a PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 9203 pts/2 T 0:00 ./rebview1210242 9204 pts/2 T 0:00 ./rebview1210242 9205 pts/2 T 0:00 ./rebview1210242 $ kill -9 9203 9204 9205 | |
9229 0.5 0.8 7780 5316 pts/2 T 10:29 0:00 ./rebview1210242 9230 0.0 0.0 0 0 pts/2 Z 10:29 0:00 [rebview1210242] <defunct> 9231 0.0 0.0 0 0 pts/2 Z 10:29 0:00 [rebview1210242] <defunct> | |
that was after doing a "fg job-id" and kill parent... | |
DideC 16-May-2005 [524] | View Test folder : I guess it's under IOS/Developper, isn't it ? |
[unknown: 10] 16-May-2005 [525] | No its a new folder in View/Desktop |
DideC 16-May-2005 [526] | Oh, OK. Did not run Desktop this last days (months ?) ;-) |
Gabriele 16-May-2005 [527x3] | Romano: that should be fixed, that error came out whenever there was a face with size = 0x0 |
pekr: that happens in 1.2.1 too, and i think it's a console quirk. | |
tom: i meant, if you could repeat the test on windows. if it's solaris only, we'll need to wait for that then. | |
Pekr 16-May-2005 [530x2] | yeah, I know ... just curious .... I tried to paste some script, and those comments did not allow me to, as it contained " char, which was not closed, but it was comment section, so it should be imo ignored ... |
in such case rebol console should look after line-break imo? | |
Anton 16-May-2005 [532] | #3656 "copy/part open/direct/read/binary what-dir 100000 ;=CRASH" Looks nice and stable from View 1.2.104.3.1 |
Gabriele 16-May-2005 [533] | Graham: i found out that you can search any field with the "Search for:" input box. so if you input "Graham" there, it will show all tickets from you. |
DideC 16-May-2005 [534] | With 1.2.107 (and may be others), when I launch a script from the desktop (clicking its icon) the new interpreter open a security request to read %rebol.r in the directory where the interpreter is (ie: %/c/rebol/view/). Something wrong with 'secure setting ? |
older newer | first last |