World: r3wp
[RAMBO] The REBOL bug and enhancement database
older newer | first last |
Gabriele 10-May-2005 [470x7] | is it? |
>> mold newline == {#"^^/"} | |
i really don't think so :) | |
Peter: about your ticket -211 about GET... GET has nothing to do with that :) | |
>> print :source ?function? | |
that's the difference between FORM and MOLD: | |
>> form :source == "?function?" >> mold :source == {func [ "Prints the source code for a word." 'word [word!] ][ prin join word ": " if not value? word [print "u... | |
Volker 10-May-2005 [477] | oh, misreaded your {#"^/"}. thare are string-parens around.. you are right :) |
Gabriele 11-May-2005 [478x2] | what do you think about http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=3363& |
a number of bugs have been fixed. please check out the "Waiting for testing" tickets to see if you favorite bug has been fixed, so that you can test it and we can switch to tested. :) | |
Volker 11-May-2005 [480x3] | 3130 Bug: On Linux, CALL interferes with TCP port wakeup, 3159 Bug: Linux: system port interferes with TCP ports using it for some hours to do remote calls thru tcp, works. did not work with older rebol. IMO fixed. |
3326 Bug: CALL should accept file! datatype does it now (linux) | |
3576 Bug: browse doesnt open web browser (Linux) and 3455 are the same. | |
Graham 11-May-2005 [483] | Is there a way to see only the rambo entries one has made ? I am "guest" and hope no body else was guest ! |
Gabriele 12-May-2005 [484] | graham: i don't think you can search by submitter currently. |
Graham 12-May-2005 [485] | Pity .. I was wondering what the status of my submissions was. |
Anton 12-May-2005 [486x3] | Bug #3099: looks much better although I noticed this: >> to-integer -2147483648.0 ** Math Error: Math or number overflow ** Where: to-integer ** Near: to integer! :value |
Bug #3403 Looks good to me on View 1.2.103 | |
Bug #3436 looks good and solid by View 1.2.102 | |
shadwolf 13-May-2005 [489x3] | don't know if it's really a bug ... |
>> greater-or-equal? 1.2.48.3.1 system/version == false >> system/version == 1.2.102.3.1 >> | |
if it's a bug it could be cool to patch it too ... | |
DideC 13-May-2005 [492x2] | >> help greater-or-equal? USAGE: GREATER-OR-EQUAL? value1 value2 DESCRIPTION: Returns TRUE if the first value is greater than or equal to the second value. GREATER-OR-EQUAL? is an action value. ARGUMENTS: value1 -- (Type: any) value2 -- (Type: any) |
So you have to invert arguments : greater-or-equal? system/version 1.2.48.3.1 | |
Ladislav 13-May-2005 [494] | RE #3099: >> to integer! #{80000000} == -2147483648 >> - to integer! #{80000000} == -2147483648 |
Gabriele 13-May-2005 [495x2] | about: http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=3363&do you think FIND should stay as it is for compatibility? or it's better to change it? |
Carl: "On negate bug: looks like a C compiler problem. I may be able to fix that with an explicit check for that value, but it will slow down the function by a lot. Is that worth it?" | |
Volker 13-May-2005 [497x3] | what is that negate-bug? Ladislavs example? thats an overflow. 0 is "positive", so there is one negative number more. and negative numbers count downward, all bits on is highest possible. the conversion is: invert all bits, add 1. gives #{7FF..}, + 1 #{800..} |
find - hmm. till 'as-string it was handy with big data. now we can rewrite it, but detecting that use is tricky. but its surely a surprise. maybe we can forbid find without /case for a while with binary? gibing some usefull warning. | |
i have a wish: integrating 'comment in some more dialects. parse, layout come to mind. could then be used for embedded documentation. what do you think? | |
BrianH 13-May-2005 [500x2] | I second the request for comment! |
Pun aside, of course. | |
Gabriele 14-May-2005 [502] | a lot of bugs fixed: http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?sort=1&limit=2&cmd=Search&id=&pattern=&subject-only=true |
Volker 14-May-2005 [503x5] | 3662 parse/lines second arg: how to split into lines and apply the rule to each line? a grep: parse/lines string-with-list-of-file-names [ set file thru ".r" end ( ?? file ) ] |
btw, can we discuss auto-dequoting again? maybe together with /all? i don't like such surprises: !>> parse { a b } "^/" == "a" "b" | |
correction, result is == ["a" "b"] my "do from editor molded /only.. | |
#3659 to-idate: i would like that fix native. that seconds are always included, even if 0. makes little clocks much nicer. and if one really dont want seconds, copy/part "00:00:00" 5 is easy. | |
(means i would fix form/mold, not to-idate) | |
Gabriele 14-May-2005 [508x3] | Tom: can you please check if 3676 still applies to 1.2.104? |
#3256: it doesn't crash here. does it crash for any of you with 1.2.104? | |
Brett: do you have the example code for #3420? is it still broken? | |
Vincent 14-May-2005 [511] | #3463 : still crash with 1.2.104 - the problem is not construct/with, it's using an object containing a recursive block as prototype : b: copy [] append/only b b an-object: make object! [a: b] make an-object [] ; crash |
Volker 14-May-2005 [512] | like b: copy [] append/only b b copy/deep b make object makes deep copies of all blocks. sure that crashes. crash should should be a softer? |
Brett 15-May-2005 [513] | Gabriele: Yes it stills seems wrong to me. Compare the last two columns of the display given by this: http://www.codeconscious.com/rebol/mlscripts/multiply-effect-test.r (Tested on REBOL/View 1.2.105.3.1 14-May-2005 Core 2.6.1) |
Gabriele 15-May-2005 [514] | thanks brett. added link to ticket. |
Romano 15-May-2005 [515] | Anamonitor fails on the last beta, i do not know why: ** Script Error: Invalid graphics face object ** Where: view ** Near: show scr-face if new [do-events] |
Pekr 15-May-2005 [516] | could it be regarded a bug in interpreter parser? >> ; test >> ; test "aaaa ** Syntax Error: Missing " at ; test "aaaa |
Tomc 15-May-2005 [517] | Gabriele: where might I find 1.2.104 for Solaris (sans X11) |
Graham 15-May-2005 [518x2] | favourite bug - the one where an encapped application is unable to launch another instance after it does a system call |
But for 1.3 .. I have to think about this. | |
older newer | first last |